Recommended criterion Sample Clauses

Recommended criterion. Regarding the definition of the concept, it is recommended that the term “persons with disabilities” be used, since this definition corresponds to the official definition adopted in the twelfth edition of Annex 9 “Facilitation” and was approved by most of ICAO member States. This recommended criterion is fully consistent with that specified in the Facilitation Manual (Doc 9957) and is what best reflects the agreement reached by the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC), where the term “person with reduced mobility” is used, thus achieving a more universal use of the proposed concept. Accordingly, Recommendation No. 1 should not be amended.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Recommended criterion. Since this is a general standard applicable to all LACAC member States, it is recommended that it apply to all air operators, regardless of nationality, so as to unify criteria amongst the different States. This criterion is based on the Preface of the Facilitation Manual, which lists the duties, commitments, and high level of cooperation required from the various community sectors, such as: airline operators, service providers, airport authorities, and inspection agencies, amongst other organisations. Accordingly, Recommendation No. 3 requires no amendment.
Sample 1
Recommended criterion. Aerodrome facilities for persons with disabilities must take into account accessibility and universal design principles. They must also be in compliance with State legislation providing for full social integration of persons with disabilities. As noted, this recommended criterion is reflected in 8.9.5 and in the background information cited in 8.9.6 of the Facilitation Manual. Furthermore, Attachment 1 “Model Airport Facilitation (FAL) Programme” to the Facilitation Manual makes direct reference to various sections and paragraphs of Annex 9. Accordingly, Recommendation No. 4 would not require amendment. Appendix A — A2 — 5.- Recommended criterion: Assistance dogs must carry the appropriate identification and the certificate issued by the corresponding health authority of each State. . This aspect is not expressly mentioned in the Facilitation Manual, but it is mentioned tangentially in Annex 9, Chapter H, through Recommended Practice 8.36 and in item 36 of Circular 274 “Access to Air Transport by Persons with Disabilities”. There is no document that addresses the identification and certification of animals assisting disabled persons by the health authority of each State. Accordingly, Recommendation No. 5 should be disregarded until expressly required by ICAO, since it could be a source of discrepancy with the laws of other States. Accordingly, it is suggested that the following recommended practice by established: Assistance dogs must carry the appropriate identification and meet the corresponding health requirements of each State.
Sample 1
Recommended criterion. The air operator must provide the necessary information to all types of passengers so that they are fully aware of their limitations and rights. This aspect is not explicitly mentioned in the Facilitation Manual, but it does appear in the Recommended Practices of Annex 9, Chapter H, 8.22, 8.25, and 8.29. Likewise, Circular 274, items 4 to 8, also provides for the delivery of the required information. Accordingly, the proposed recommendation must be maintained.
Sample 1

Related to Recommended criterion

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Desirable Selection Criteria Post registration qualification in the area of specialty or evidence of significant progression towards one.

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of: a. Teaching effectiveness, including effectiveness in presenting knowledge, information, and ideas by means or methods such as lecture, discussion, assignment and recitation, demonstration, laboratory exercise, practical experience, supervision of interns, theses, professional projects and/or dissertations, and direct consultation with students. The evaluation shall include consideration of effectiveness in imparting knowledge and skills, and effectiveness in stimulating students' critical thinking and/or creative abilities, the development or revision of curriculum and course structure, and adherence to accepted standards of professional behavior in meeting responsibilities to students. The evaluator may take into account class notes, syllabi, student exams and assignments, and any other materials relevant to the employee's teaching assignment. The teaching evaluation must take into account any relevant materials submitted by the employee, including the results of peer evaluations of teaching, and may not be based solely on student evaluations when this additional information has been made available to the evaluator. b. Contribution to the discovery of new knowledge, development of new educational techniques, and other forms of creative activity. Evidence of research and other creative activity shall include, but not be limited to, published books; articles and papers in professional journals; musical compositions, paintings, sculpture; works of performing art; papers presented at meetings of professional societies; funded grant activities; and research and creative accomplishments that have not yet resulted in publication, display, or performance. The evaluation shall include consideration of the employee's productivity, including the quality and quantity of the employee's research and other creative programs and contributions during the year, as well as recognition by the academic or professional community of what has been done. c. Public service that extends professional or discipline-related contributions to the community, the State, public schools, and/or the national and international community. This public service includes contributions to scholarly and professional organizations, governmental boards, agencies, and commissions that are beneficial to such groups and individuals. d. Participation in the governance processes of the University through significant service on committees, councils, and senates, beyond that associated with the expected responsibility to participate in the governance of the University through participation in regular departmental or college meetings. e. Other assigned University duties, such as attending University events, advising, counseling, and academic administration, or as described in a Position Description, if any, of the position held by the employee. Other assigned duties may include entrepreneurial activities that contribute to the further development of the University with an end result of creating a new venture. Evidence of entrepreneurial contributions shall include, but not be limited to, creation of self- supporting centers or institutes, development of multi- disciplinary research partnerships, and applications of research to implementations in society. To provide guidelines for the establishment, maintenance and use of employee evaluation files within the employee’s respective academic unit.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Facilities Planning and Construction Constructability Manual. Identify and document project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of project goals, objectives.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Targets Seller’s supplier diversity spending target for Work supporting the construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date is ____ percent (___%) as measured relative to Seller’s total expenditures on construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date, and;

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Goal The goals of the Department’s grants are to: 1. Reduce delinquency, increase offender accountability, and rehabilitate juvenile offenders through a comprehensive, coordinated, community-based juvenile probation system;

  • Acceptance Criteria The Services and Deliverables must meet the following acceptance criteria or the JBE may reject the applicable Services or Deliverables. The JBE may use the attached Acceptance and Signoff Form to notify Contractor of the acceptance or rejection of the Services and Deliverables. Contractor will not be paid for any rejected Services or Deliverables.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!