Required Review. The municipalities agree to review and evaluate the effectiveness of the provisions contained herein within five years from the effective date and to amend this Agreement more frequently, if necessary, if recommended by the COG Land Use and Community Infrastrucure Committee and approved by a unit vote of the COG General Forum. The municipalities agree to amend any municipal ordinances to conform to this Agreement within the timeframe established by the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC).
Required Review. To educate students on the expectations for responsible and appropriate use of the OMSD provided devices, services, network and internet access, students are required to review and sign this Agreement each school year. Additionally, OMSD staff supervising students who use the OMSD electronic network shall emphasize to students’ appropriate use of network and devices. The parent/guardian of a student is also required to acknowledge receipt and understanding of this Agreement. District Technology Policies • The OMSD electronic network has been established for educational purposes and not as a public access service or a public forum. • A content filtering solution is in place to prevent access to visual depictions that are obscene, pornographic, inappropriate for students, or harmful to minors, as defined by the Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) • Students must sign and adhere to this Agreement, and parent/guardian permission is required for all students under the age of
Required Review. Offerors should carefully review this solicitation for defects and questionable or objectionable material. Comments concerning defects and objectionable material must be made in writing and received by the Lead State Contract Administrator at least ten
Required Review. Offerors are required to carefully review this solicitation for defects and questionable or objectionable matter. Comments concerning defects and objectionable material must be made in writing to the procurement analyst and received by the City at least 10 days before the proposal closing. This will allow issuance of any necessary addendum. It will also help prevent opening a defective solicitation and exposure of offeror's proposals upon which an award could not be made. A protest based on omission or error, or on the content of the solicitation, will be disallowed if these faults have not been brought to the attention of the City, in writing, at least 10 days before the time set for closing.
Required Review. Vendors and/or service providers shall carefully review this RFP for defects as well as questionable or objectionable matter. Comments concerning defects and questionable or objectionable material must be made in writing and received by Delta County Administrator Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, 000 Xxxxxxxxx Xx., Suite 222, Escanaba, MI 49829. Telephone conversations are not considered official and must be confirmed in writing by the interested party.
Required Review. Offerors should carefully review this solicitation for defects and questionable or objectionable material. Comments concerning defects and objectionable material must be made in writing and received by the Lead State contracting manager at least ten (10) days before the deadline for receipt of proposals. This will allow time for the issuance of any necessary amendments. It will also help prevent the opening of a defective solicitation and exposure of Offeror's proposals upon which award could not be made. Protests based on any omission or error, or on the content of the solicitation, will be disallowed if these faults have not been brought to the attention of the Lead State contracting manager, in writing, at least ten (10) days before the deadline for receipt of proposals.
Required Review. The Planning and Building Director may approve an application for commercial use incentive zoning that complies with Table 9 if the Director finds that:
Required Review. Submissions are required to carefully review this RQU for defects and questionable or objectionable matter. Comments concerning defects and objectionable material must be made in writing to the procurement analyst and received by the City at least 10 days before the submission closing. This will allow issuance of any necessary addendum. It will also help prevent opening a defective RQU and exposure of offeror's submission upon which an award could not be made. A protest based on omission or error, or on the content of the RQU, will be disallowed if these faults have not been brought to the attention of the City, in writing, at least 10 days before the time set for closing.
Required Review. Before submitting a proposal, each Offeror must thoroughly and carefully examine this RFP, any attachment, addendum, and any other relevant document, to ensure Offeror understands the requirements of the RFP. Offeror must also become familiar with State, local, and Federal laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations that may in any manner affect cost, progress, or performance of the work required. Should Offeror find defects and questionable or objectionable items in the RFP, Offeror shall notify the State in writing prior to the deadline for written questions as stated in the Schedule and Significant Dates, as amended. This will allow the issuance of any necessary corrections and/or amendments to the RFP by addendum and mitigate reliance on a defective solicitation and exposure of proposal(s) upon which award could not be made.
