Resource Adequacy Failure Sample Clauses

Resource Adequacy Failure. For each RA Shortfall Month occurring after the RA Guarantee Date, Seller shall pay to Buyer an amount (the “RA Deficiency Amount”) equal to the product of the difference, expressed in kW, of (i) the Qualifying Capacity of the Facility, minus (ii) the Net Qualifying Capacity of the Facility for such month able to be shown on Buyer’s monthly or annual RA Plan to the CAISO and CPUC and counted as Resource Adequacy for System RA and, if applicable, Local RA, (such difference, the “RA Shortfall”), multiplied by the sum of (a) the CPUC System RA Penalty and (b) CPM Soft Offer Cap as listed in Section 43A.4.1.1 of the CAISO Tariff (or its successor); provided that Seller may, as an alternative to paying RA Deficiency Amounts, provide Replacement RA in amounts up to the RA Shortfall, provided that any Replacement RA capacity is communicated by Seller to Buyer with Replacement RA product information in a written notice to Buyer at least seventy-five (75) days before the applicable CPUC operating month for the purpose of monthly RA reporting.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Resource Adequacy Failure. The Parties acknowledge and agree that if Seller has failed to obtain Full Capacity Deliverability Status for the Facility in the amount equal to the Guaranteed RA Amount by the Commercial Operation Date, or if Seller otherwise fails to provide Resource Adequacy Benefits as required hereunder (or Replacement RA in lieu thereof), then Seller shall pay to Buyer the RA Deficiency Amount for each RA Shortfall Month as liquidated damages due to Buyer, and as Buyer’s sole remedy, for the Capacity Attributes that Seller failed to convey to Buyer.
Resource Adequacy Failure. For each RA Shortfall Month occurring after the RA Guarantee Date, Seller shall pay to Buyers an amount (the “RA Deficiency Amount”) equal to the product of the difference, expressed in kW, of (i) the Qualifying Capacity of the Facility for such month, minus (ii) the Net Qualifying Capacity of the Facility for such month, including any adjustments for unforced capacity (UCAP) or similar adjustments, however described, minus (ii) the Net Qualifying Capacity of the Facility for such month, multiplied by the CPM Soft Offer Cap as listed in Section 43A.4.1.1 of the CAISO Tariff (or its successor); provided that Seller may, as an alternative to paying RA Deficiency Amounts, provide Replacement RA in the amount of (X) the Qualifying Capacity of the Facility with respect to such month, minus (Y) the Net Qualifying Capacity of the Facility with respect to such month, provided that any Replacement RA capacity is communicated by Seller to Buyers with Replacement RA product information in a written notice to Buyers at least seventy-five (75) days before the applicable CPUC operating month for the purpose of monthly RA reporting. Station Use: Buyers will not be responsible for Station Use and Station Use will not be provided by the Facility. Expected Construction Start Date: Seller reasonably expects to achieve Construction Start by the following date [_______] (the “Expected Construction Start Date”).
Resource Adequacy Failure. For each RA Shortfall Month occurring after the RA Guarantee Date, Seller shall pay to Buyer an amount (the “RA Deficiency Amount”) equal to the product of the difference, expressed in kW, of (i) the Qualifying Capacity of the Facility for such month, minus (ii) the Net Qualifying Capacity of the Facility for such month, including any adjustments for unforced capacity (UCAP) or similar adjustments, however described, minus (ii) the Net Qualifying Capacity of the Facility for such month, multiplied by the CPM Soft Offer Cap as listed in Section 43A.4.1.1 of the CAISO Tariff (or its successor); provided that Seller may, as an alternative to paying RA Deficiency Amounts, provide Replacement RA in the amount of (X) the Qualifying Capacity of the Facility with respect to such month, minus (Y) the Net Qualifying Capacity of the Facility with respect to such month, provided that any Replacement RA capacity is communicated by Seller to Buyer with Replacement RA product information in a written notice to Buyer at least seventy-five (75) days before the applicable CPUC operating month for the purpose of monthly RA reporting.
Resource Adequacy Failure. Subject to Section 19.12:
Resource Adequacy Failure. (a) For each RA Shortfall Month, Seller shall pay to Buyer as liquidated damages the RA Deficiency Amount, as set forth in Section 10.3(b), and/or provide Replacement RA, as set forth in Section 10.1(f), in each case, as the sole remedy for Capacity Attributes that Seller fails to convey to the Project Participants from each Facility.
Resource Adequacy Failure. For each RA Shortfall Month occurring after the RA Guarantee Date, Seller shall pay to Buyer an amount (the “RA Deficiency Amount”) equal to the product of the difference, expressed in kW, of (i) the Facility’s Qualifying Capacity and (ii) the Resource Adequacy Benefits of the Facility for such month able to be shown on Buyer’s monthly or annual RA Plan to the CAISO and CPUC and counted as Resource Adequacy Benefits, (such difference, the “RA Shortfall”), multiplied by the sum of (a) the CPUC System RA Penalty (a “CPUC-Penalized Shortfall”), (b) the CAISO costs, charges or penalties associated with the shortfall (the “CAISO-Penalized Shortfall”), (c) and for any RA Shortfall which is not a CPUC-Penalized Shortfall and/or CAISO-Penalized Shortfall, and for which Buyer purchased replacement Resource Adequacy Benefits, the amount of Buyer’s cost of such replacement Resource Adequacy Benefits and (d) for any RA Shortfall which is not CPUC-Penalized Shortfall and/or CAISO-Penalized Shortfall, and for which Buyer did not purchase replacement Resource Adequacy Benefits, the greater of (A) the product of (1) such portion of the RA Shortfall multiplied by (y) the CPM Soft Offer Cap, and (B) the prevailing market value of such RA Shortfall, as reasonably determined by Buyer.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Resource Adequacy Failure. For each RA Shortfall Month occurring after the RA Guarantee Date, Seller shall pay to Buyer an amount (the “RA Deficiency Amount”) For each RA Shortfall Month occurring after the RA Guarantee Date, Seller shall pay to Buyer an amount (the “RA Deficiency Amount”) equal to the product of the difference, expressed in kW, of (i) the Qualifying Capacity of the Facility, minus (ii) the Net Qualifying Capacity of the Facility for such month able to be shown on Buyer’s monthly or annual RA Plan to the CAISO and CPUC and counted as Resource Adequacy for System RA and, if applicable, Local RA, (such difference, the “RA Shortfall”), multiplied by the sum of (a) the CPUC System RA Penalty and (b) CPM Soft Offer Cap as listed in Section 43A.4.1.1 of the CAISO Tariff (or its successor); provided that Seller may, as an alternative to paying RA Deficiency Amounts, provide Replacement RA in amounts up to the RA Shortfall, provided that any Replacement RA capacity is communicated by Seller to Buyer with Replacement RA product information in a written notice to Buyer at least seventy-five (75) days before the applicable CPUC operating month for the purpose of monthly RA reporting.
Resource Adequacy Failure. The Parties acknowledge and agree that if Seller has failed to obtain Full Capacity Deliverability Status or secured interconnection and transmission service to an CAISO Intertie for the Facility in the amount equal to the Guaranteed RA Amount by COD, or if Seller otherwise fails to provide the Guaranteed RA Amount of Capacity Attributes in any Showing Month beginning with the Showing Month that contains the COD, then Seller shall pay to Buyer the RA Deficiency Amount for each RA Shortfall Month as liquidated damages due to Buyer, and as Buyer’s sole remedy, for the Capacity Attributes that Seller failed to convey to Buyer.
Resource Adequacy Failure 
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.