RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES Sample Clauses

RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES. The authorities responsible for implementation of this Agreement are: - For the Portuguese Party, the Ministry of National Defence of the Portuguese Republic; - For the Turkish Party, the Ministry of National Defence of the Republic of Turkey.

RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES. Section 3

RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES. CANADA designates the Canadian International Development Agency (hereinafter called "CIDA" ) as the agency responsible for the implementation of its obligations under this Memorandum of Understanding.

RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES. For the purposes of Article 4, paragraph 3, on consultation, Article 9, on mutual legal assistance and Article 10, on extradition, each Party shall notify to the Secretary-General of the OECD an authority or authori- ties responsible for making and receiving requests, which shall serve as channel of communication for these matters for that Party, without prejudice to other arrangements between Parties.

RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES. SECTION 2.1 CANADA designates the Canadian International Development Agency (hereinafter called "CIDA") to assume it responsibilities under this Memorandum of Understanding. CANADA will designate a Canadian Executing Agency (hereinafter called "CEA") to be contracted through the open bidding system to assume the responsibilities related to the implementation of the Project described in Article III. SECTION 2.02 THE PHILIPPINES designates the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (hereinafter called "DENR") to assume its responsibilities under this Memorandum of Understanding and to chair an Executive Committee which will oversee the implementation of the Project.

RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES. Responsible authorities are under a statutory duty to ensure that they come together and work in a Community Safety Partnership (CSP). To work in partnership requires information to be shared between these agencies. The responsible authorities are: • District council, borough council, unitary authority or county council • Police force • Fire and Rescue Authority • Clinical Commissioning Groups • National Probation Service • Community Rehabilitation Company Responsible Authorities are required to work in co-operation with probation boards, parish councils, NHS Trusts, NHS Foundation Trusts, proprietors of independent schools and governing bodies of an institution within the further education sector. From 31 July 2007, Registered Social Landlords were made co-operating bodies with the responsible authorities of community safety partnerships. The Housing Act 2004 also amended Section 115 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 allowing the disclosure of information to Registered Social Landlords for the purposes associated with Section 1 of the Crime and Disorder Act which is in relation to anti-social behaviour. Responsible Authorities are expected to invite the co-operation of relevant local private, voluntary and community groups, including the public, to become involved partnership activity. Invitees asked to participate are drawn from agencies whose knowledge will assist CDRP members to reduce crime and anti-social behaviour more effectively. Access to information for these groups may be limited. Section 5(3) of the Crime and Disorder Act provides descriptions of persons or bodies, at least one of which must be invited by the Responsible Authorities to participate in the exercise of the functions conferred by section 6 of that Act (primarily the development and delivery of a partnership strategy for the reduction of crime and disorder and tackling drug abuse). Each responsible authority has the statutory duty to nominate a Designated Liaison Officer (see 9.2 & 9.4 below).

RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES. Those persons referred to in section 5(1) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 which are under a duty to formulate and implement strategies in compliance with the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.

RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES. 1.01 The Government designates Sida as the party responsible for the implementation of its obligations under this Agreement. 1.02 ADB designates the Office of Cofinancing Operations as the department responsible for the implementation of ADB’s obligations under this Agreement pertaining to general communications and financial matters, and the Agriculture, Natural Resources and Social Sectors Division of the Regional and Sustainable Development Department as the department responsible for the implementation of ADB’s obligations under this Agreement pertaining to the implementation of the Program and related technical matters, or such other department as ADB may specify.

RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES. This agreement has been drawn up on behalf of the Partners of the Kent Community Safety Partnership and in association with the Office of the Kent Police and Crime Commissioner:- • Kent Police • Kent Fire and Rescue Service (KFRS) • Kent County Council • Local District/Borough Authorities • NHS Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board • Probation Service • Local District/Borough Community Safety Partnerships Local Community Safety Partnership (CSP) strategic assessments: All statutory partners including Police, Fire and Rescue, Health, Probation, County Council services, Local Authority services provided community safety information for use by the twelve Community Safety Partnerships (CSPs) in Kent during the strategic assessment process to help determine their key priorities. The following table shows the outcome of the local assessments with the key issues identified locally either as a main priority, cross-cutting theme or as part of a broader theme. Priority No. of CSPs Identifying these Issues Domestic Abuse 12 ASB / Environmental 12 Tackling Violence (including serious violence, violent crime, violence reduction, youth violence) 12 Safeguarding and Vulnerability (including child sexual exploitation, vulnerable people, repeat victims) 10 Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) (inc. stalking & harassment) 9 Serious and Organised Crime (including gangs, organised crime groups, county lines, modern slavery/human trafficking) 9 Substance Misuse (including drug supply, alcohol abuse, night- time economy) 9 Extremism & Hate (including preventing extremism, counter- terrorism & hate crimes) 8 Strengthening Communities (cohesion, resilience, reassurance) 7 Reducing Offending and Reoffending 6 Mental Health and Wellbeing 6 Crime (including acquisitive, property, doorstep crime & scams) 5 In 2016-17 the Kent Community Safety Team (KCST) facilitated a pilot with six district/borough community safety units in Kent to trial the use of the MoRiLE (Management of Risk in Law Enforcement) scoring matrix within the local strategic assessments. The aim of MoRiLE is to enable specific issues to be ranked based on threat, risk and harm and to help target resources at those which have the greatest impact on individuals and communities not just those with the greatest volume. At that time a national pilot was also in progress, which ▇▇▇▇ participated in, to look at whether MoRiLE which was originally developed for use by law enforcement agencies could be adapted to the needs ...