Retailer Sample Clauses

Retailer. During the term of this Agreement, except as otherwise permitted -------- under Article 2.6(a) of the License Agreement, Retailer agrees to not engage in the business of creating, developing, operating, advertising and promoting a business-to-consumer e-commerce business on the Internet which directly or indirectly generates in excess of 20% of its revenues from the sale of sporting goods, athletic footwear, athletic apparel and related goods and services ("Restricted Business"), except that if Retailer acquires another business selling sporting goods, athletic footwear and/or athletic apparel and related goods and services either through land based stores or through catalog sales which is engaged in e-commerce business, Retailer can continue to operate the e- commerce business of the acquired business until such time, if ever, that Retailer changes 50% or more of the acquired business's land based stores to stores operating under the name "The Sports Authority" or any variation thereof or changes the catalog name to "the Sports Authority" or any variation thereof. If Retailer desires to engage in any Restricted Business during the term of this Agreement, it shall only do so through XXX.xxx and such business shall be conducted on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

Retailer. Internet Retailer is in the business of retail sales of various products to the general public via the internet within the territory of the United States, including those of similar class and description to Product.

Retailer. Retailer, at its own cost and expense, shall defend, indemnify -------- and hold harmless XXX.xxx and any of its officers, directors, employees or agents from and against any and all actions, claims, proceedings or lawsuits arising from or related in any way to: (a) any claim that XXX.xxx's use of the Marks as permitted hereunder and under the License Agreement, including use of Retailer's URL and of the name and Xxxx "XxxXxxxxxXxxxxxxxx.xxx" infringes the trademark, service xxxx, trade dress or trade name rights of any third party in the U.S., its territories and possessions, Puerto Rico, or Canada, provided, however, that Retailer shall not bear any duty, obligation or liability pursuant to this Article 15.1 to the extent that, and with respect to which, any use by XXX.xxx of any of the Marks is in a manner not authorized by this Agreement or the License Agreement; or (b) from Retailer's gross negligence or willful or intentional misconduct.

Retailer. The natural person or entity that executes the Agreement and is authorized by MBUSA to sell and service Mercedes-Benz Light Truck Products as defined herein.

Retailer. A trader, other than the organiser, who sells or offers for sale packages combined by an organiser.

Retailer. Retailer hereby agrees to do the following: 2.1 To provide GfK with the Retailer Deliverable as specified in the Delivery Schedule above. No customer information or any other personal information that could be used to identify a Retailer customer will be disclosed to or used by GfK. 2.2 During the Term, as extended by any renewal periods as agreed by the parties in writing, and for a period of six (6) months thereafter, the Retailer agrees that it will not license, provide or otherwise distribute the data specified on the first page to any additional research companies other than GfK for the purpose of aggregating and reporting sales in the tire specialty Channel. 2.3 To pay GfK for the GfK Deliverables according to the payment schedule in the Agreement above. 2.4 To exercise at least the same amount of diligence and efforts to protect and guard the Confidential Information (defined below) of GfK as Retailer exercises with its own confidential and proprietary information, and to avoid divulging, publishing, loaning, reproducing in whole or in part, giving, selling, or permitting any third parties to divulge, publish, loan, reproduce, in whole or in part, give, or sell any Confidential Information. The same principles shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to GfK’s handling of Retailer Confidential Information (defined below). 2.5 To promptly advise GfK in the event Retailer becomes aware of any disclosure of Confidential Information by or to any person or entity, which is not a party to this Agreement, or of any third party offering reports or seeking to collect data of the type Retailer is furnished to GfK if for the purpose of aggregating such data with other retailers and/or reporting the results of such aggregation,

Retailer. 1.1 The agreement shall be deemed to have commenced from , 20 and shall remain in force for 1 year at the address 1.2 To maintain the official Retailer ship agreement with the Company, the retailer must have a minimum recurring order of 10 sets/ 40 units a month with an MOQ of 5 sets for their respective territory . 1.3 The Company may at its sole discretion sell directly in the Retailer’s Territory via its online E- commerce retail store site xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx or its Franchisee stores in the Retailer’s territory. 1.4 If the retailer is unable to perform for up to 3 consecutive months the company has the right to terminate the agreement with the RETAILER.

Retailer a person who agrees, by arrangement with us or a Card acceptance scheme, to accept the Card as payment for goods Security Code: the last three digits on the signature strip on the reverse of the Card. Services: the Card facilities to be provided to the Business and to the Cardholders under this Agreement, together with any other services associated with the Card(s) that we may make available to the Business and/or the Cardholders from time to time. Statement: the monthly statement of the Business Account issued to the Business and which will also include a demand for the minimum payment.

Retailer. The corporation, partner or proprietorship designated on page 1 of this Retailer Agreement.

Retailer. No increase in wholesale cost Increased margin and/or better competitive position • Perception that Centrica is disadvantaged due to lower asset cover, however: 1 Centrica’s asset portfolio (inc. Spalding) currently provides more than 80% of British Gas’ residential customer demand; maximum potential of over 90% 2 High level of cover already in place for phase I and moderate CO2 prices expected in early years 3 Perceived advantage of existing coal plant overestimated due to a number of factors: • Any windfall in the near term is capped at new entry price (if free allocation is given to new entrants) • Increased auctioning in later phases • Large Combustion Plant Directive • Scheme introduces perverse outcome - the more competitive a market structure, the more likely EU ETS is to create distortion • “expect Northern European utilities […] to benefit more than Southern European utilities, as […] it is more likely that the CO2 price will be internalised into electricity prices in those markets” • “in very concentrated market structures and/or markets with price intervention, i.e. most of Southern Europe, we do not think that ETS has had any pricing impact” • “Overall we see German and the competitive east European utilities […] to come out particularly well from ETS up to 2012” Source: UBS, Feb 2005 • Already granted land and consents for development of gas-fired power station • As such, phase II treatment of new entrants absolutely crucial • Directive requires incumbents to receive at least 90% of allowances free of charge in phase II - difficult to see this changing • New entrants will enter market when price signals stimulate good rate of return • If required to buy allowances, price level at which new entry is initiated will increase • Grants incumbents greater scope to increase their prices without threat of new entry (increased windfall) • Conversely, granting new entrants allowances on the same basis as incumbents will help to cap wholesale power price (and windfall) at a more realistic level • Vis à vis incumbents, which have no EUA price risk, it is anti-competitive to place this risk on new entrants • For allowance prices below €20/tCO2, free allowances will effectively “cap” wholesale prices at new entry cost • Arguments for free allocation hold true for as long as incumbents are allocated EUAs free of charge, i.e. impact on new entrants not diluted by full awareness of EU ETS 0 €10/t €30/t €40/t €10/t €30/t €40/t • Centrica recognises that it is i...