Scoring, Standardizing, Weighting and Combining Test Scores Sample Clauses

Scoring, Standardizing, Weighting and Combining Test Scores. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the scoring of all testing components. The testing instruments administered by the CITY have been validated by the CONSULTANT on the basis of criterion and content validation strategies. The written ability test shall be scored in a straightforward manner, with each of the 60 items being worth one point. The work style and biodata inventory scales shall be used to score the candidate’s work style and biodata inventory tests. CONSULTANT shall generate oral board scores for each candidate based on a statistical combination of assessor scores. If necessary, and based on discussions with the Project team, CONSULTANT will standardize scores by board and exercise version to ensure that any differences that occur as a result of board or exercise assignment are eliminated. Once the CONSULTANT has scored all tests, the CONSULTANT will standardize each test component and apply the prescribed weights to each component. These weights were derived on the basis of the job analysis and criterion-related validity results and finalized through joint discussion with the CITY’S Project team. The CONSULTANT shall then add the scores together to generate a total score for each candidate.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Scoring, Standardizing, Weighting and Combining Test Scores. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the scoring of all testing components. The testing instruments administered by the CITY shall have been previously validated by the CONSULTANT prior to administration on the basis of criterion and content validation strategies. The written ability test shall be scored in a straightforward manner, with each of the 75 items being worth one point. The work style and biodata inventory scales shall be used to score the candidate’s work style and biodata inventory tests. CONSULTANT shall generate oral board scores for each candidate based on a statistical combination of assessor scores. If necessary, and based on discussions with the Project team, CONSULTANT will standardize scores by board and exercise version to ensure that any differences that occur as a result of board or exercise assignment are eliminated. Once the CONSULTANT has scored all tests, the CONSULTANT will standardize each test component and apply the prescribed weights to each component. These weights shall be derived on the basis of the job analysis results and finalized through joint discussion with the Overland Park Project team. The CONSULTANT shall then add the scores together to generate a total score for each candidate. In addition to the above, the CONSULTANT shall merge the dataset from five (5) test administrations to refine the scoring solution and derive common scoring, banding and cut-off standards for use with future administrations. Establishing common standards will allow applicants from different administrations to be directly compared and to be merged onto a common list. The scoring solution will be re-examined and refined, if appropriate, based on the combined candidate database from the five (5) test administrations. Effort will be directed toward minimizing subgroup differences while maintaining validity as established by the criterion-related validity study conducted in 1999. Common scoring standards shall be recommended by using the merged dataset characteristics to derive: a) formulas for standardizing scores on each test element, b) a common set of bands, and c) a common cut-off score for use with applicant groups moving forward in the selection process.
Sample 1

Related to Scoring, Standardizing, Weighting and Combining Test Scores

  • Compliance Measures The Contractor is required to price for Covid 19 compliance and the pricing thereof shall be deemed to include all the mandatory requirements. 110 F: ……….… V: ….……… T: ….……... Item

  • Corrective Measures If the Participating Generator fails to meet or maintain the requirements set forth in this Agreement and/or the CAISO Tariff, the CAISO shall be permitted to take any of the measures, contained or referenced in the CAISO Tariff, which the CAISO deems to be necessary to correct the situation.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • CORRECTIVE MEASURE The contractor shall repair any deficiencies in excess of the performance guideline.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@t xxx-xxx.xxx

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.