Selection Process and Criteria Sample Clauses

Selection Process and Criteria. All applications are initially reviewed for eligibility by staff members of the Governor’s Office of Economic Development (GOED). Other State agencies and/or Expert Reviewers are asked to provide a technical review of applications, as appropriate. This information is provided to the CDBG Advisory Committee for consideration in the allocation process. The Advisory Committee scores, ranks, and recommends applications for funding to the Director of Rural Community and Economic Development of the Governor’s Office of Economic Development. The recommendations are then submitted to the Deputy Director - North of GOED and to the Governor for final approval. Each community that applies for funds will be allowed to make a presentation at the Advisory Committee meeting. Each community is permitted 15 minutes to present its project: five minutes of presentation time per application and ten minutes to respond to questions from the Advisory Committee per application. Communities not able to send a representative in-person to present to the AC may present via video. In accordance with federal law, the CDBG Advisory Committee must meet or exceed the requirement that 70 percent of the State's CDBG funds, over a three-year period, is allocated to projects that benefit low- and moderate-income persons.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Selection Process and Criteria. Selection will be based on County review of respondents’ proposed services and fee, qualifications, and experience. Selection criteria will not be based solely on price or fee. The County reserves the right to request clarification and/or request additional information from firms if necessary. Such clarifications and/or additional information shall be submitted by the firms as an addendum to the proposal upon request of the County representative. However, such additional input is not a guarantee of contract award. Firms are advised to submit complete information in the proposal. The County reserves the right to withhold all information regarding this procurement until after contract execution, including but not limited to: • The number of proposals received • Competitive technical information • Any County evaluation findings The information releasable after contract execution is subject to the disclosure requirements of the Public Records Act, California Government Code Section 6250 and following. This request does not constitute an offer of employment or to contract for services. The County reserves the option to reject any or all proposals, wholly or in part, received by reason of this request, without cause. All proposals shall remain firm for the duration of the project. The County reserves the right to award the contract to the firm that presents the proposal which, in the judgment of the County, best accomplishes the desired results.
Sample 1

Related to Selection Process and Criteria

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Selection Procedure 10.2.4.1 Internal applicants shall be defined as all applicants with seniority in accordance with Article 12.5.

  • Selection Procedures In selecting the Loan Assets to be Pledged pursuant to this Agreement, no selection procedures were employed which are intended to be adverse to the interests of the Lenders.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Origin Criteria For the goods that meet the origin criteria, the exporter should indicate in Box 8 of this Form, the origin criteria met, in the manner shown in the following table: Circumstances of production or manufacture in the country named in Box 11 of this form: Insert in Box 8

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Induction Procedures a) The parties to this Agreement acknowledge that it is in the interests of the industry that all new employees and employers on a building project understand their obligations to this Agreement and are introduced to their jobs in a manner which will help them work safely and efficiently.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.