Shared Decision Sample Clauses

Shared Decision. Making: School-based, shared decision-making and building- level autonomy are key to meeting student need. Key decisions will be made by school leaders working with the school’s Educator Leader Team, consistent with the key principles of Labor Management Partnerships,1 along with a site-based Community Council supporting each school. The WLC should explore training and expertise to make sure this shared decision-making is effectively structured. The specific types of school-based decisions and flexibilities that schools will now be enabled to determine at the building level, to ensure that work is done with educators, includes but is not limited to: • School culture and identity; 1 The National Labor-Management Partnership includes the American Association of School Administrators (AASA), the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), the National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP), the National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP), the National Education Association (NEA), and the National School Boards Association (NSBA). • School schedules and calendars, being cognizant of and in coordination with district operations, policies, and support departments, and adhering to state law and regulations around school calendars; • Resource and staff deployment, being cognizant of and in coordination with district operations and policies; • Certain working conditions (including professional learning topics, professional learning schedules, and interventions), subject to MOUs reflecting such changes to working conditions if applicable; • Well-rounded, equitable, engaging enrichment opportunities for students, which may also include release time for educators for professional learning and collaboration, consistent with the requirements of 14 Delaware Code section 1335; and • New hires, staffing priorities, and customized mentoring practices. As the instructional and operational leader of their school, principals will conduct regular and frequent meetings with their ELT and site-based Community Council to ensure voices and perspectives are heard and represented in their decisions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Shared Decision. Making The District and the Union agree that Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a process in which the School Leadership Team (SLT) will work collaboratively with the Principal in identifying issues, defining goals relative to the Academic Achievement Plan, developing school budgets and formulating policy and the implementation of such. The uniqueness of each school community requires that the organizational and instructional issues discussed are determined by the SLT. The District and the Union agree that in order to achieve SDM at the school level, the SLT must agree to participate in required SDM training and work cooperatively in order to bring about changes, which may include significant restructuring of instruction.
Shared Decision making Plan. Each school building shall provide a plan in writing by October 1 to SKEA and the District for making shared or site-based decisions each school year. This plan shall be used for the decisions identified in the collective bargaining agreement as being “shared” or “site-based” and other types of decisions identified in the plan. The plan for shared decision-making shall be developed and agreed upon by a consensus of the certificated staff assigned to the building, except that if true consensus cannot be reached, it shall be approved by a vote of at least 85% of the certificated staff assigned to the building. Buildings which already have a shared decision-making plan are not required to develop a new one each year, but must confirm the consensus on that plan each year prior to October 1.
Shared Decision. Making The teaching staff, administration and Board of Education of Shawnee Heights U.S.D. believe that teachers share in decision-making through participatory management with membership on District Quality Council, Site-based Councils, Exit Standards Committee, North Central Steering Committee and sub-committees, Quality Performance Accreditation Committees and other committees required by state mandate or formed out of necessity to address management objectives.
Shared Decision. Making In order to xxxxxx shared decision-making in the Scottsdale Unified School District, the Executive Board of SSPA or designees appointed by the Executive Board, will participate in all major decisions affecting District policies and procedures.
Shared Decision. Making: School-based, shared decision-making and building level autonomy are key to meeting student need. Key decisions should be made by school leaders working with the school’s Educator Leader Team, consistent with the key principles of Labor Management Partnerships, along with a site-based Community Council supporting each school. The WLC should explore training and expertise to make sure this shared decision- making is effectively structured. The specific types of school-based decisions and flexibilities that schools will now be enabled to determine at the building level, to ensure that work is done with educators, includes but is not limited to: • School culture and identity; • School schedules and calendars; • Resource and staff deployment; • Certain working conditions (including professional learning topics, professional learning schedules, and interventions); • Well-rounded, equitable, engaging enrichment opportunities for students; and • New hires, staffing priorities, and customized mentoring practices.

Related to Shared Decision

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • COURT'S DECISION 33.01 In the event of any articles or portions of this Agreement being held improper or invalid by any Court of Law or Labour Relations Board, such decision shall not invalidate any other portions of this Agreement than those directly specified by such decision to be invalid, improper or otherwise unenforceable.

  • Decision Making The JDC shall make decisions unanimously, with each Party’s representatives collectively having one (1) vote and at least one (1) representative from each Party participating in such decision. In the event the JDC determines that it cannot reach an agreement regarding a decision within the JDC’s authority, then, within *** Business Days after such determination: (a) for any matter that is not a Critical Issue *** shall have the final decision making authority on such matter; and (b) for any matter that is a Critical Issue, the matter shall be referred to FivePrime’s Chief Executive Officer (or designee) and HGS’ Chief Executive Officer (or designee) for resolution. If such executives cannot resolve the matter within *** Business Days, then the Chief Executive Officer of *** (or designee) shall have the final decision making authority on such matter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Development Plan shall not be amended, without FivePrime’s prior written approval (which approval may be withheld in FivePrime’s sole discretion), to: (i) increase or materially change the nature of FivePrime-Conducted Trials or Other FivePrime-Conducted Activities; or (ii) require FivePrime to continue any FivePrime-Conducted Trial if FivePrime, in its reasonable judgment, decides not to continue such trial for any business, scientific, safety, efficacy, enrollment or ethical reason, provided that, in the event FivePrime so decides to discontinue such trial, HGS shall have no further obligation to reimburse FivePrime under Section 4.2(d) except with respect to costs *** INDICATES MATERIAL THAT WAS OMITTED AND FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT WAS REQUESTED. ALL SUCH OMITTED MATERIAL WAS FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. already incurred by FivePrime prior to such discontinuation and any and all standard close out costs incurred thereafter, and HGS shall have the right to continue such trial by itself at its expense. When *** make a final determination under this Section 3.4, that final determination must be consistent with the terms of this Agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!