Split Functionality sF Clause Samples

Split Functionality sF. The split functionality is a generic construction based upon an ideal functionality: Its description can be found on Figure 1. In the initialization stage, the adversary adaptively chooses disjoint subsets of the honest parties (with a unique session identifier that is fixed for the duration of the protocol). More precisely, the protocol starts with a session identifier sid. Then, the initialization stage generates some random values which, combined together and with sid, create the new session identifier sid′, shared by all parties which have received the same values – that is, the parties of the disjoint subsets. The important point here is that the subsets create a partition of the players, thus forbidding commu- nication among the subsets. During the computation, each subset H activates a separate instance of the functionality F. All these functionality instances are independent: The executions of the protocol for each subset H can only be related in the way the adversary chooses the inputs of the players it controls. The parties Pi ∈ H provide their own inputs and receive their own outputs (see the first item of “computation” in Figure 1), whereas the adversary plays the role of all the parties Pj ∈/ H (see the second item).
View SourceView Similar (2)
Split Functionality sF. The split functionality is a generic construction based upon an ideal functionality: Its description can be found on Figure 1. In the initialization stage, the adversary adaptively chooses disjoint subsets of the honest parties (with a unique session identi er that is xed for the duration of the protocol). More precisely, the protocol starts with a session identi er sid. Then, the initialization stage generates some random values which, combined together and with sid, create the new session identi er sidj, shared by all parties which have received the same values that is, the parties of the disjoint subsets. The important point here is that the subsets create a partition of the players, thus forbidding commu- nication among the subsets. During the computation, each subset H activates a separate instance of the functionality F . All these functionality instances are independent: The executions of the protocol for each subset H can only be related in the way the adversary chooses the inputs of the players it controls. The parties Pi ∈ H provide their own inputs and receive their own outputs (see the rst item of computation in Figure 1), whereas the adversary plays the role of all the parties Pj ∈/ H (see the second item). The Group Password-Based Key Exchange Functionality with Mutual Authentication. In this section, we discuss the FGP AKE functionality (see Figure 2). The multi-session extension of our functionality would be similar to the one proposed by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ [27]. Our starting points are the group key exchange functionality described in [34] and the (two party) password-based key exchange functionality given in [25]. Our aim is to combine the two of them and to add mutual authentication and (t, n)-contributiveness. The new de nition still remains very general: letting t = 1, we get back the case in which the adversary may manage to set the key when it controls at least a player, as in [25]. First, notice that the functionality is not in charge of providing the passwords to the participants. Rather we let the environment do this. As already pointed out in [25], such an approach allows to model, for example, the case where some users may use the same password for di erent protocols and, more generally, the case where passwords are chosen according to some arbitrary distribution (i.e. not necessarily the uniform one). Moreover, notice that allowing the environment to choose the passwords guarantees forward secrecy, basically for free. More gener...
View Source

Related to Split Functionality sF

  • Future Functionality You agree that Your purchases are not contingent on the delivery of any future functionality or features, or dependent on any oral or written public comments made by Us regarding future functionality or features.

  • Proposed Policies and Procedures Regarding New Online Content and Functionality By February 1, 2017, the Division will submit to OCR for its review and approval proposed policies and procedures (“the Plan for New Content”) to ensure that all new, newly-added, or modified online content and functionality will be accessible to people with disabilities as measured by conformance to the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set forth above, except where doing so would impose a fundamental alteration or undue burden. a) When fundamental alteration or undue burden defenses apply, the Plan for New Content will require the Division to provide equally effective alternative access. The Plan for New Content will require the Division, in providing equally effective alternate access, to take any actions that do not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens, but nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services as their nondisabled peers. To provide equally effective alternate access, alternatives are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for persons with and without disabilities, but must afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s needs. b) The Plan for New Content must include sufficient quality assurance procedures, backed by adequate personnel and financial resources, for full implementation. This provision also applies to the Division online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third-party vendor or by using open sources. c) Within thirty (30) days of receiving OCR’s approval of the Plan for New Content, the Division will officially adopt and fully implement the amended policies and procedures.

  • Attachment A, Scope of Services The scope of services is amended as follows:

  • CUSTOMER SERVICE FUNCTIONS The Servicer shall handle all Customer inquiries and other Customer service matters according to the same procedures it uses to service Customers with respect to its own charges.

  • Telemedicine Services This plan covers clinically appropriate telemedicine services when the service is provided via remote access through an on-line service or other interactive audio and video telecommunications system in accordance with R.I. General Law § 27-81-1. Clinically appropriate telemedicine services may be obtained from a network provider, and from our designated telemedicine service provider. When you seek telemedicine services from our designated telemedicine service provider, the amount you pay is listed in the Summary of Medical Benefits. When you receive a covered healthcare service from a network provider via remote access, the amount you pay depends on the covered healthcare service you receive, as indicated in the Summary of Medical Benefits. For information about telemedicine services, our designated telemedicine service provider, and how to access telemedicine services, please visit our website or contact our Customer Service Department.