Split or Multiple Appointments. For faculty with split, or multiple appointments, there must be a primary department (or College, School, Library or Extension) that is responsible for the professional development and evaluation of a faculty member; for maintaining complete records; for initiating recommendations concerning changes in appointment status; and for any eventual tenure commitment. The primary department (or College, School Library or Extension) and the nature and extent of the funding and/or effort commitment of the faculty member’s secondary appointment(s) in the other academic department(s) will be designated at the time of initial appointment or of change of appointment status. The reviews and recommendations of the responsible administrator of any units (i.e. academic department, College, School, Library, Extension and/or Matrix Center) in which a faculty member holds a secondary appointment shall be requested by the Department Chair/ Associate Xxxx or Xxxx of the primary unit and reported to him/her in advance of the initial level of review by the primary unit for purposes of annual performance review, reappointment, promotion or tenure. Appointments to the Matrix Centers are secondary appointments and will follow the practices and procedures specified below for secondary appointments. Reviews and recommendations by administrators of secondary units shall be included with the RPT materials being reviewed and subsequently be placed in the faculty member’s Academic Record file in the primary unit. Further, no member of the bargaining unit may hold split or multiple appointments of differing term lengths e.g. a 9-month primary appointment and a 12-month secondary appointment. Appointment lengths will be of the same length. This will not prevent a faculty member from earning additional compensation, as described in Article 19, during those months outside of the 9- or 10- month term length.
Split or Multiple Appointments. For faculty with split, or multiple appointments, there must be a primary department (or College, School, Library or Extension) that is responsible for the profes- sional development and evaluation of a faculty member; for maintaining complete records; for ini- tiating recommendations concerning changes in appointment status; and for any eventual tenure commitment. The primary department (or College, School Library or Extension) and the nature and extent of the funding and/or effort commitment of the faculty member’s secondary appoint- ment(s) in the other academic department(s) will be designated at the time of initial appointment or of change of appointment status. The reviews and recommendations of the responsible administra- tor of any units (i.e.. academic department, College, School, Library, Extension and/or Matrix Center) in which a faculty member holds a secondary appointment shall be requested by the De- partment Chair/ Associate Xxxx or Xxxx of the primary unit and reported to him/her in advance of the initial level of review by the primary unit for purposes of annual performance review, reap- pointment, promotion or tenure. Appointments to the Matrix Centers are secondary appointments and will follow the practices and procedures specified below for secondary appointments. Reviews and recommendations by administrators of secondary units shall be included with the RPT materi- als being reviewed and subsequently be placed in the faculty member’s Academic Record file in the primary unit. Further, no member of the bargaining unit may hold split or multiple appointments of differing term lengths e.g. a 9-month primary appointment and a 12-month secondary appointment. Ap- pointment lengths will be of the same length. This will not prevent a faculty member from earning additional compensation, as described in Article 19, during those months outside of the 9- or 10- month term length.
Split or Multiple Appointments. Article 14.3 Annual Performance Reviews 29 will be placed in the faculty member’s Academic Record File, with a copy provided to the faculty member by May 15. A faculty member has the right to rebut his or her evaluator’s assessment not later than ninety (90) days following the issue of the evaluator’s written evaluation, and any such rebuttal shall be placed in the faculty member’s Academic Record File.
