Standard for Evaluation Sample Clauses

Standard for Evaluation. A Senior Instructor under consideration for reappointment must demonstrate that she or he has met or exceeded the written expectations of her or his Department and continues to demonstrate superior teaching effectiveness. Where this is achieved, there is a normal expectation of reappointment.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Standard for Evaluation. An Assistant Professor under consideration for reappointment must demonstrate that he or she is making reasonable progress toward meeting the written expectations of her or his Department (Faculty in the case of a non- departmentalized Faculty) with regard to the granting of tenure. Assistant Professors whose initial appointment was made before July 1, 2000 are evaluated in accordance with the expectations described in the Tenure Document, their respective letters of appointment and written communications to them by their respective Chairs (Deans in the case of non-departmentalized Faculties).
Standard for Evaluation. The requirements of this Factor are met when:
Standard for Evaluation. This factor considers the extent of the Applicants past experience on Similar Scope and Complexity projects. The Applicant must demonstrate successful experience on three (3) projects each for the Prime Contractor (150 points) and Lead Architectural firm (150 points) substantially completed in the last 10 years.
Standard for Evaluation. In evaluating the information provided by the references, the County will consider the Applicant's:

Related to Standard for Evaluation

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. The administration will be evaluating the teacher’s performance within the time of formal responsibility. The evaluation process and form will be shared with the Association Building Representatives at the beginning of each school year. (a) Probationary teachers shall be evaluated at least two (2) times a year. The first evaluation will be completed prior to December 1st and the second prior to April 15th. Each evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations, on the performance of other duties and responsibilities and the goals developed in the Individualized Development Plan (IDP). The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at anytime prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the probationary teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. (b) Tenured teachers will be evaluated on a rotating schedule, but no less than once every three- (3) years. The administration reserves the right to evaluate a tenured teacher more often. The evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations and on the performance of other duties and responsibilities. The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at any time prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the tenured teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. 2. The administrator shall prepare and submit a written evaluation and recommendations to the teacher prior to May 30th of the year they are evaluated. The administrator shall hold a conference with the teacher to discuss the written evaluation and recommendations. 3. Upon receipt of the evaluation the teacher will sign the form indicating his/her receipt of the report. The signature on the form does not constitute his/her approval unless specifically noted. 4. Teachers involved with the instruction of Advanced Placement courses will be evaluated. This evaluation in the first year will be made part of the formal evaluation only at the request of the teacher. B. A teacher who disagrees with the content or procedure of evaluation may submit a written answer which shall be attached to the file copy of the evaluation in question and/or submit any complaints through Level 4 of the grievance procedure. C. If an administrator believes a teacher is doing unacceptable work, the reasons shall be set forth in specific terms. Included will be examples of specific ways in which the teacher is to improve and assistance may be given by the administrator and other staff members. In subsequent conferences it shall be the responsibility of the individual teacher to inquire whether adequate improvement has taken place. D. Monitoring and observation of the work performance of the teacher shall be conducted openly. The public address or audio system or similar types of communications will not be used for the purpose of evaluation. E. The Board and the Association recognize that the ability of pupils to progress and mature academically is a combined result of the school, home, economic and social environment and that teachers alone cannot be held accountable for all aspects of the academic achievement of the pupil in the classroom. Test results of academic progress of students shall not be used as the sole determinant or in isolated instances to evaluate the quality of a teacher's service or fitness for retention. F. All communications, including evaluations by Milan Administrators, commendations, and documented complaints directed toward the teacher which are to be included in the personnel file shall be made available for review of the teacher prior to placement in the file; a copy of any such communication will be provided to the teacher at this time. Pre-placement information such as confidential credentials, letters of reference from universities, individuals, or previous employers are exempt from such review. A written statement for inclusion in the personnel file may then be made by the teacher in regard to materials that were not signed by the teacher. A representative of the Association may accompany the teacher. G. Ordinarily, observations of teachers shall not be for less than a full class period or for the duration of a particular teaching lesson.

  • Requirements for E- Bidders 3.1. For Individual/ Joint E-Bidders, the following documents shall be uploaded during online registration; 3.1.1. Copy of Identification Documents (both sides) 3.1.2. Evidence of deposit payment 3.2. For Agent acting for Individual/ Joint Online Bidders, the following documents shall be uploaded during online registration; 3.2.1. Copy of Identification Documents (both sides) of Individual/ Joint Online Bidder 3.2.2. Copy of Identification Documents (both sides) of Agent 3.2.3. Copy of letter of authorization to bid 3.2.4. Evidence of deposit payment 3.3. For Company, the following documents shall be uploaded during online registration: 3.3.1. Copy of Identification Documents (both sides) of the representative. 3.3.2. Copy of letter of authorization to bid under the Company’s Letter Head 3.3.3. Form 24; Form 44; Form 49 (or their equivalent forms under the Companies Act 2016)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!