Sub-project Review and Selection Sample Clauses

Sub-project Review and Selection. The Recipient shall ensure that each Sub-project is the subject of a corresponding proposal for a Kecamatan Grant that has been prepared, submitted and reviewed in accordance with the guidelines, procedures and selection criteria set forth in the Project Manual, any Supplemental Manual and this Annex. The Recipient, through PMD, shall ensure that, with respect to each Sub-project and prior to carrying out Sub-project works, a technical Facilitator shall have completed a technical review of each Sub-project in accordance with the Project Manual and any Supplemental Manual and the requirements of this Annex to ensure that all requirements have been complied with, including, except as may be otherwise agreed in writing by the World Bank and the Recipient: necessary funding to fully finance the proposed Sub-project has been obtained, including a Kecamatan Grant, any Local Government Participation and any additional contributions to be made by communities themselves or from other sources; the provisions of the Environmental Management Framework have been complied with and, where applicable, an Environmental Management Plan fully consistent with this Agreement and the Environmental Management Framework has been prepared and agreed upon and adopted; the provisions of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework have been complied with and, where applicable, a Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan fully consistent with this Agreement and the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework, and deemed satisfactory to the Displaced Persons, has been agreed upon and adopted; the provisions of the Isolated and Vulnerable Peoples Framework, if applicable, has been complied with; and a maintenance program, and the budget therefor, for works to be carried out under the Sub-project and related goods has been prepared. The Recipient shall ensure that the Kabupaten Satker shall retain records of each such review.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Sub-project Review and Selection. The Borrower shall ensure that each Sub-project is the subject of a corresponding proposal for a Kelurahan Grant that has been prepared, submitted and reviewed in accordance with the guidelines, procedures and selection criteria set forth in the Project Manual and this Annex.
Sub-project Review and Selection. 1. The Borrower shall ensure that each Sub-project is the subject of a corresponding proposal for a Kecamatan Grant that has been prepared, submitted and reviewed in accordance with the guidelines, procedures and selection criteria set forth in the Project Manual and this Annex.
Sub-project Review and Selection. 1. The Recipient shall ensure that each Sub-project is the subject of a corresponding proposal for a Disaster Management Kecamatan Grant that has been prepared, submitted and reviewed in accordance with the guidelines, procedures and selection criteria set forth in the Project Manual, the supplemental Disaster Management Manual and this Annex.

Related to Sub-project Review and Selection

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Project Completion Report At the completion of construction and once a Project is placed in service, the Subrecipient must submit a Project Completion Report that includes the total number of units built and leased, affordable units built and leased, DR-MHP units built and leased, an accomplishment narrative, and the tenants names, demographics and income for each DR-MHP unit.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5 Execution of Project and Operation of Project Facilities; Financial Matters

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.