Sustainability and country ownership Sample Clauses

Sustainability and country ownership. The FF project is a strong reference within FAO in relation to AMR. In further commitment to ensure sustainability of the proposed interventions, FAO continues prioritizing the initiatives that started through the previous and current FF support, embedding them into subsequent projects and programmes. Indeed, based on the FAO Action Plan on AMR, FAO is following a programmatic approach in the technical implementation of all projects including the FF. For instance: • FF has supported the development of the International FAO Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring (InFARM) data platform that is being funded through FAO regular budget as well as other extra budgetary resources such as the TISSA component of MPTF global project, the AMR Codex standards project supported by the Republic of Korea, and the US ARPA project. This ensures that despite the use of this platform during the FF project, the impact on data will be sustained beyond the project’s lifetime. • In addition, FAO has a One Health programme Fund, a multi-lateral US$10million project which has included an AMR outcome, outputs, and activities, and these are certainly complementary to the FF project. • The organization plans on utilizing FAO regular budget to provide platforms where training and tools can be made available in a digital format for implementation and easy access by countries. In this regard, all training materials and tools developed for use in AMR-related activities (including ATLASS, PMP-AMR, Famer Field School training materials, Laboratory, and surveillance training materials, etc.) will be made accessible to the global community, ensuring wider usage beyond the current project. • In addition, tools developed with support of FF project, like the one developed by FAO for legal assessment, are being used as the bedrock for the development of Quadripartite One Health tools. • Application of the Farmer Field Schools and other social science approaches have been successfully piloted through the FF project, and these approaches are being included in most upcoming FAO projects on AMR. As FFS is not exclusive to AMR and has been in use for over 40 years in other FAO programs and projects, the organization will further mainstream the FFS work on AMR, which is funded by FF project, into the wider FAO FSS initiatives. Furthermore, the programmatic approach implemented by FAO, which includes cost-share human resources across complementary programmes, will facilitate that once FF is no longer prov...
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Sustainability and country ownership

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING CERTAIN FOREIGN-OWNED COMPANIES IN CONNECTION WITH CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: Proposing Company is prohibited from entering into a contract or other agreement relating to critical infrastructure that would grant to the company direct or remote access to or control of critical infrastructure in this state, excluding access specifically allowed by the Proposing Company for product warranty and support purposes. Company, certifies that neither it nor its parent company nor any affiliate of company or its parent company, is (1) owned by or the majority of stock or other ownership interest of the company is held or controlled by individuals who are citizens of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country; (2) a company or other entity, including governmental entity, that is owned or controlled by citizens of or is directly controlled by the government of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country; or (3) headquartered in China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country. For purposes of this contract, “critical infrastructure” means “a communication infrastructure system, cybersecurity system, electric grid, hazardous waste treatment system, or water treatment facility.” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.0101(2) of SB 1226 (87th leg.). The company verifies and certifies that company will not grant direct or remote access to or control of critical infrastructure, except for product warranty and support purposes, to prohibited individuals, companies, or entities, including governmental entities, owned, controlled, or headquartered in China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country, as determined by the Governor.

  • ANTI-BRIBERY COMPLIANCE The Parties hereby acknowledge the importance of combating and preventing bribery and to that end both Parties agree to comply fully with all applicable laws, regulations and sanctions relating to anti-bribery and anti-corruption.

  • Certification Regarding Prohibition of Boycotting Israel (Tex Gov. Code 2271) If (a) Vendor is not a sole proprietorship; (b) Vendor has ten (10) or more full-time employees; and (c) this Agreement or any agreement with a TIPS Member under this procurement has value of $100,000 or more, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Vendor certifies, where applicable, that neither the Vendor, nor any affiliate, subsidiary, or parent company of Vendor, if any, boycotts Israel, and Vendor agrees that Vendor and Vendor Companies will not boycott Israel during the term of this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “boycott” shall mean and include refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action that is intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with Israel, or with a person or entity doing business in Israel or in an Israeli-controlled territory but does not include an action made for ordinary business purposes. When applicable, does Vendor certify? Yes

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.