System Change Sample Clauses

System Change. 29 3.13 Benchmarking................................................29 3.14 Executive Balanced Scorecard................................29 3.15
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
System Change. (a) Each time, if any and subject to other provisions of this Agreement, that VENDOR CONSORTIUM proposes to make a material change substantially for its own benefit in the operating environment in which VENDOR CONSORTIUM is operating Software (a "System Change"), VENDOR CONSORTIUM shall (i) perform a comparison, at a reasonable and mutually agreed level of detail, between the amount of resources required by that Software to perform a representative sample of the processing then currently being performed for SIRVA immediately prior to the System Change and immediately after the System Change, or (ii) demonstrate to SIRVA that such change will not affect SIRVA's charges, costs, or resource utilization. (b) SIRVA shall not be required to pay for increased resource usage due to a System Change. If, following a System Change, VENDOR CONSORTIUM contends that increased resource usage is from increased SIRVA use and not from the System Change, SIRVA shall only be required to pay for increased usage to the extent VENDOR CONSORTIUM demonstrates to SIRVA that increased usage is not due to the System Change and is due to SIRVA usage. Any such demonstration shall use the same representative sample as used in the comparison above.
Sample 1
System Change. ‌ Within the Evolution Layer, System Change refers to the case, where one of the partici- pating systems is replaced. This might be the Active System (e.g. because a new type of active system is adopted for the same task) or the DPS (e.g. because a preservation provider goes out of business or the use wants to change the provider). Of course, it is also possible that the middleware is replaced with a middleware solution based on a different approach or technology. However, this case is out of the scope of this reference model. The two cases, change of Active System and change of Preservation System have very different implications and are, therefore, considered separately. The most interesting aspect for the change of Active System is how the content preserved with Active System A can still be accessed, if the system no longer exists or is no longer in use. This might mean to access the preserved content through a new Active System B or to access it via a lightweight access infrastructure such as a Web Interface. For covering those cases we have created a modified Re-activation workflow (see Figure 10). A prerequisite for accessing the content of Active System A is some type of an identifier (and credentials) for getting access to the content that has been connected to a user via Active System A. After (1) authentication, the owner or another user on behalf of the owner can access the content. For not overwhelming the user with the full content col- lection, which might have a considerable size, a high-level and user-friendly structuring principle is required. For this purpose, the concept of situations has been introduced into the reference model (see also section on Information Model). Therefore, after authenti- cation, the user can perform a (2) situation search, which returns to the user a list of situations, for which there is content in the archive (or the list of situations fulfilling the user query). Search can be either offered as an integrated part of the new Active System B or separately (e.g, via a Web Interface, see above). For each of the situations also a short description in the form of a profile is given (see Situation Profile in Section 4.1). The
Sample 1
System Change. The core strength of the proposed project is the promise it holds to transform the ways that training is delivered to prepare workers in California for entry-level positions in direct patient care. Our region’s aging population, the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, anticipated retirements from positions along the career pathway, and a wide range of other factors will continue to demand greater numbers of new workers in the occupations targeted by the project and, at the same time, require from the onset that these workers be better prepared than their predecessors to take on the full range of challenges that their jobs present. The project will pilot the combination of paid “internships,” which are based in real world work settings, with didactic coursework to create a new model for producing job ready graduates in direct patient care at entry points to the pathway. As discussed, project- related benefits abound for job seekers and healthcare organizations. The former become more “hireable” by virtue of their status as OJT interns, who expand upon their classroom learning by working alongside skilled managers and counterparts. The latter (businesses hiring new graduates) train new hires to meet industry and company requirements, thus developing workers who are better skilled and less likely to commit errors as new employees in the workplace.
Sample 1
System Change. Works with Infosys to elaborate, manage, test and deploy recommended systems changes. They own the system change process from definition to deployment.
Sample 1
System Change. (a) Each time, if any and subject to other provisions of this Agreement, that EDS, without the consent of SK, makes a material change in the operating environment in which EDS is operating Software (other than those changes specifically requested by SK) (each such change a "System Change"), EDS shall perform a comparison, at a reasonable and mutually agreed level of detail, between the amount of resources required by that Software to perform a representative sample of the processing then currently being performed for SK immediately prior to the System Change and immediately after the System Change. (b) SK shall not be required to pay for increased resource usage due to a System Change. If, following a System Change, EDS contends that increased resource usage is from increased SK use and not from the System Change, SK shall only be required to pay for increased usage as and to the extent EDS demonstrates to SK that increased usage is not due to the System Change and is due to SK usage. Any such demonstration shall utilize the same representative sample as used in the comparison above.
Sample 1

Related to System Change

  • Shift Change Where employees are assigned mid-week to work a non-day shift (whether due to emergencies or a shift change) and as a result lose a shift in the regular work week, such employees will be paid six (6) hours for such loss of earnings.

  • Major Workplace Change If the Employer has made a decision to introduce a major workplace change that is likely to have a Significant Effect on a number of Employees, the Employer must notify the Employee(s) who will be affected by the decision. As soon as practicable and prior to implementation, the Employer must discuss with the relevant Employees and/or their nominated representative/s (e.g. Union or other representative) the introduction of the change; and the effect the change is likely to have on the Employees. The Employer must discuss measures to avert or mitigate the adverse effect of the change on the Employees.

  • Major Change For a major change referred to in paragraph (1)(a):

  • Status Change Upon the termination of the Optionee’s Employment, this Option shall continue or terminate, as and to the extent provided in the Plan and this Agreement.

  • Service Changes PBI may modify its Service by giving written notice to you (a “Service Change Notice”), which will state whether the change is material. After receiving a Service Change Notice, if the change is material, you may terminate Service by giving us a termination notice at the address indicated in Section 21 or you may create a case at xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/xx/xxxxxxx-xx.xxxx (follow the instructions under “how to create a case”).

  • NETWORK CHANGES 3.1. Sprint shall provide notice of network changes and upgrades in accordance with §§ 51.325 through 51.335 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Sprint may discontinue any interconnection arrangement, Telecommunications Service, or Network Element provided or required hereunder due to network changes or upgrades after providing CLEC notice as required by this Section. Sprint agrees to cooperate with CLEC and/or the appropriate regulatory body in any transition resulting from such discontinuation of service and to minimize the impact to customers, which may result from such discontinuance of service.

  • Discontinuation Either party may discontinue the job/time sharing arrangement with ninety

  • Plan Changes In the event the Employer modifies its current benefit plans, or provides an alternative plan(s), the Employer will review the plan changes with the Union prior to implementation. The Employer shall notify the Union at least ninety (90) days prior to the intended implementation date. The implementation date is the effective date of the new plan.

  • Change of Control/Change in Management (i) During any period of twelve (12) consecutive months ending on each anniversary of the Agreement Date, individuals who at the beginning of any such 12-month period constituted the Board of Trustees of the Parent Guarantor (together with any new trustees whose election by such Board or whose nomination for election by the shareholders of the Parent Guarantor was approved by a vote of a majority of the trustees then still in office who were either trustees at the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board of Trustees of the Parent Guarantor then in office; (ii) Any “person” or “group” (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act, except that a Person will be deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of all securities that such Person has the right to acquire, whether such right is exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time), directly or indirectly, of more than 35% of the total voting power of the then outstanding voting stock of the Parent Guarantor; (iii) The Parent Guarantor shall cease to own and control, directly or indirectly, at least a majority of the outstanding Equity Interests of the Borrower; or (iv) The Parent Guarantor or a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of the Parent Guarantor shall cease to be the sole general partner of the Borrower or shall cease to have the sole and exclusive power to exercise all management and control over the Borrower.

  • Change The School, as any other, is likely to undergo a number of changes during the period of this agreement. For example, there may be changes in the staff, and in the premises, facilities and their use, in the curriculum and the size and composition of classes, and in the School rules and procedures, the disciplinary framework, and the length of School Terms. In addition, there may be the need to undertake a corporate reorganisation exercise and / or a merger or change of ownership may be necessary. For these reasons, the benefit and burden of this agreement may be freely assigned to another party at the discretion of the School.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!