System Impact Study Agreement Sample Clauses

System Impact Study Agreement. As soon as practicable after receiving the Transmission Developer’s election in the Scoping Meeting in accordance with Section 22.4.2.4 to proceed to a System Impact Study (“SIS”) or simultaneously with the delivery of an Optional Feasibility Study to the Transmission Developer, the ISO shall tender the Transmission Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner a System Impact Study Agreement. Upon tendering the System Impact Study Agreement, the ISO shall provide to the Transmission Developer a non-binding good faith estimate of the cost and timeframe for completing the SIS. The Transmission Developer must provide a $120,000 study deposit to the ISO for the SIS if the ISO is responsible for performing the entire study; provided, however, that if the Transmission Developer is hiring a third-party consultant to perform the analytical portion of the study, pursuant to the requirements set forth in Section 22.13.4 of this Attachment P, the required deposit is $40,000. The System Impact Study Agreement shall specify that the Transmission Developer is responsible for the actual costs incurred by the ISO and the Connecting Transmission Owner for the SIS. The System Impact Study Agreement shall provide that if actual study costs exceed the study deposit, the Transmission Developer shall pay the ISO the amount in excess of the study deposit, and if the actual study costs are less than the study deposit, the ISO shall refund the remaining deposit amount to the Transmission Developer. The System Impact Study Agreement shall also set forth the study schedule based on the study scope.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
System Impact Study Agreement. Unless otherwise agreed, within ten (10) Business Days after the delivery of the Feasibility Study to Interconnection Customer, IPA shall provide to Interconnection Customer a System Impact Study Agreement substantially in the form of Appendix 3 pursuant to which IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, will conduct a System Impact Study at Interconnection Customer’s sole cost and expense. IPA may draw upon and apply any remainder of the Interconnection Customer’s initial deposit to perform the study or have a consultant approved by IPA perform the study. In the event that the remainder of the initial deposit is not sufficient to cover the actual costs of such study, including any costs for Reassessment in accordance with Section 7.5, upon receipt of an invoice from IPA for a good faith estimate of the costs to complete such study, Interconnection Customer shall pay to IPA the amount of such estimate prior to IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, proceeding or continuing with such study. Interconnection Customer shall execute the System Impact Study Agreement and deliver the executed System Impact Study Agreement to IPA no later than thirty (30) calendar days after its receipt, along with demonstration of Site Control or the posting of a deposit in addition to that already made in Section 3.2.1(iii) in the amount specified in the Deposit Amount Schedule, which shall be refundable without interest if and when Interconnection Customer demonstrates Site Control or withdraws its application. If Interconnection Customer does not provide all required technical data when it delivers the executed System Impact Study Agreement, IPA shall notify Interconnection Customer of any deficiency within five (5) Business Days of the receipt of the executed System Impact Study Agreement. Interconnection Customer shall have ten (10) Business Days to cure the deficiency; provided, however, that if the deficiency is either a failure to deliver the executed System Impact Study Agreement or a failure to pay any additionally invoiced deposit specified above, the cure period shall not apply. If Interconnection Customer fails to cure the deficiency within the period specified above, IPA may deem the Interconnection Request withdrawn in accordance with Section 3.5. If the System Impact Study discloses any unexpected result(s) not contemplated during the Scoping Meeting or in the Feasibility Study, a substitute Point of Interconnection identified by Interconnection Customer, IPA, or a con...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
System Impact Study Agreement. THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 20 by and between , a organized and existing under the laws of the State of , ("Interconnection Customer,") and , a existing under the laws of the State of , ("Transmission Provider"). Interconnection Customer and Transmission Provider each may be referred to as a "Party," or collectively as the "Parties."
Sample 1Sample 2
System Impact Study Agreement. THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this day of 20 _ by and between , a _ organized and existing under the laws of the State of _, (“Interconnection Member,”) and Piedmont Electric Membership Corporation, a Cooperative existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina , (“Cooperative”). The Interconnection Member and the Cooperative each may be referred to as a “Party,” or collectively as the “Parties.”
Sample 1
System Impact Study Agreement or the DISIS Agreement (as specified in the Utility’s applicable Appendix CS) has been executed by the Interconnection Customer include only:
Sample 1

Related to System Impact Study Agreement

  • System Impact Study An assessment by the Transmission Provider of (i) the adequacy of the Transmission System to accommodate a Completed Application, an Interconnection Request or an Upgrade Request, (ii) whether any additional costs may be incurred in order to provide such transmission service or to accommodate an Interconnection Request, and (iii) with respect to an Interconnection Request, an estimated date that an Interconnection Customer’s Customer Facility can be interconnected with the Transmission System and an estimate of the Interconnection Customer’s cost responsibility for the interconnection; and (iv) with respect to an Upgrade Request, the estimated cost of the requested system upgrades or expansion, or of the cost of the system upgrades or expansion, necessary to provide the requested incremental rights.

  • Project Management Plan 9.1.1 Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work. Developer shall undertake all aspects of quality assurance and quality control for the Project and Work in accordance with the approved Project Management Plan and Good Industry Practice.

  • Statement of Work The Contractor shall provide the services and staff, and otherwise do all things necessary for or incidental to the performance of work, as set forth below:

  • Project Plan Development of Project Plan Upon the Authorized User’s request, the Contractor must develop a Project Plan. This Project Plan may include Implementation personnel, installation timeframes, escalation procedures and an acceptance plan as appropriate for the Services requested. Specific requirements of the plan will be defined in the RFQ. In response to the RFQ, the Contractor must agree to furnish all labor and supervision necessary to successfully perform Services procured from this Lot. Project Plan Document The Contractor will provide to the Authorized User, a Project Plan that may contain the following items: • Name of the Project Manager, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • Names of the Project Team Members, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • A list of Implementation milestones based on the Authorized User’s desired installation date; • A list of responsibilities of the Authorized User during system Implementation; • A list of designated Contractor Authorized Personnel; • Escalation procedures including management personnel contact numbers; • Full and complete documentation of all Implementation work; • Samples of knowledge transfer documentation; and • When applicable, a list of all materials and supplies required to complete the Implementation described in the RFQ. Materials and Supplies Required to Complete Implementation In the event that there are items required to complete an Implementation, the Contractor may request the items be added to its Contract if the items meet the scope of the Contract. Negotiation of Final Project Plan If the Authorized User chooses to require a full Project Plan, the State further reserves the right for Authorized Users to negotiate the final Project Plan with the apparent RFQ awardee. Such negotiation must not substantively change the scope of the RFQ plan, but can alter timeframes or other incidental factors of the final Project Plan. The Authorized User will provide the Contractor a minimum of five (5) business days’ notice of the final negotiation date. The Authorized User reserves the right to move to the next responsible and responsive bidder if Contractor negotiations are unsuccessful.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.