Table 4A note 1, amend to read: "1 Positive ignition particulate mass OBD thresholds apply only to vehicles with direct injection engines"
Table 4A. Transfers to instruments under direct or indirect management where such possibility is provided for in the basic act * (breakdown by year) Transfer from Transfer to Breakdown by year Fund Category of region Instrument 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total * Transfers may be made to any other instruments under direct or indirect management; where such possibility is provided for in the basic act. Number and names of the relevant Union instruments will be specified accordingly Table 4B: Transfers to instruments under direct or indirect management where such possibility is provided for in the basic act* (summary) Fund Category of region Total Total * Transfers may be made to any other instruments under direct or indirect management; where such possibility is provided for in the basic act. Number and names of the relevant Union instruments will be specified accordingly Justification
Table 4A. CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-19-08] PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: SL-19-08 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Maintenance Tools and Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project purchases major replacement tools, equipment and parts used in routine vehicle maintenance. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Equipment must be replaced to ensure proper maintenance of all SunLine vehicles. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date July 2018 June 2021 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount State of Good Repair 2019 $50,000 Total $50,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 66
Table 4A. CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-19-09] PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: SL-19-09 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Install Electric Charger for Buses – Division 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project will install electric charging stations at SunLine’s Indio division. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION By installing charging stations at Division 2, the Agency will increase efficiency by cutting down deadhead time and increase productivity of daily bus operations. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date July 2018 June 2021 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount State of Good Repair 2019 $78,623 Total $78,623 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance 67 TABLE 4A – CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-19-10] PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: SL-19-10 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Bus Simulator (2) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project will purchase two (2) bus simulators to provide realistic scenario driver training. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This equipment will provide realistic driving simulation in a controlled classroom environment. This allows the Agency to use minimal resources and provide a greater level of training and correct driving techniques to mitigate potential hazards. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date July 2018 June 2021 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA 2019 $600,000 Total $600,000 FTA Grant # RCTC Grant # Description Unexpended balance TABLE 5.1 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR FY 2019/2020 69 Short Range Transit Plan • F Y 2 0 1 8 - 2 0 1 9
Table 4A. Statistical breakdown of the impact of the 2011 floods on consumption Total Food Alcoholic Clothing Utility Furniture Healthcare & non- beverages expenses alcoholic & tobacco beverages products (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 𝑇𝑖𝑡 17.25*** -0.23*** -0.06*** -0.04*** -0.10** 0.04 0.10*** (2.02) (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.03) (0.02) (0.02) 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡 -69.60*** 0.89*** 0.24*** 0.32*** 1.00*** 0.19 0.05 (14.53) (0.26) (0.06) (0.04) (0.15) (0.14) (0.14) 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡 ∗𝑇𝑖𝑡 25.27*** -0.34*** -0.07*** -0.20*** -0.11** -0.13* -0.19*** (5.56) (0.08) (0.02) (0.01) (0.04) (0.06) (0.04) Notes: Xxxxx-Xxxx standard errors are in parentheses. One lag is set as the maximum lag order of auto- correlation. *, **, *** denote statistical significance at the respective levels of 10%, 5%, and 1%. Each component of consumption is expressed as a percentage of total consumption expenditure. The coefficient of 𝑇𝑖𝑡represents the estimated consumption trend before the disaster, while the coefficient of the variable 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡∗𝑡𝑇𝑖𝑒𝑡captures the difference in the consumption trend before and after the disaster. The estimated coefficient of the variable 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡c𝑡ap𝑒tures the immediate change in consumption expenditure after the disaster. Column (1) shows the estimates of the effects of the disaster on total consumption measured in billions of Thai baht, while the rest of the columns indicate the consumption components as percentages of total consumption. See Section 4.1 for more details on the regressions and interpretation of the estimated coefficients. Table 4b. Statistical breakdown of the impact of the 2011 floods on consumption (continued) Transport Communication Recreation Restaurants & hotel Education Miscellaneous (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) 𝑇𝑖𝑡 0.04 0.01 0.10*** 0.20** -0.01** 0.06 (0.02) (0.03) (0.01) (0.06) (0.01) (0.04) 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡 -1.89*** 0.15 -0.13 -0.71*** 0.05 0.18 (0.27) (0.16) (0.11) (0.18) (0.03) (0.30) 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡 ∗𝑇𝑖𝑡 1.09*** -0.11** -0.01 -0.07 -0.04*** -0.0008 (0.09) (0.04) (0.04) (0.07) (0.01) (0.08) Notes: Xxxxx-Xxxx standard errors are in parentheses. One lag is set as the maximum lag order of auto- correlation. *, **, *** denote statistical significance at the respective levels of 10%, 5%, and 1%. Each component of consumption is expressed as a percentage of total consumption expenditure. The coefficient of 𝑇𝑖𝑡represents the estimated consumption trend before the disaster, while the coefficient of the variable...
Table 4A. 1 Comparison between conventional thermodilution cardiac output and XxXXX’x pulse contour cardiac output. Authors and references Number of Bias ±SD Limits of agreement Patients / Measurements L/min L/min Xxxxx O et al. [10] 24 / 517 -0.2 ± 1.15 -2.32 to 2.28 Xxxxxxxxx et al.* [16] 20 / 360 -0.28 ± 0.66 -1.46 to 1.18 Xxxxx Xxxxx et al. [17] 62 / 186 -0.02 ± 0.74 -1.50 to 1.46 Xxxx Xxxxx et al. [18] 58 / 318 -0.04 ± 0.85 -1.65 to 1.73 Xxxxxx et al. [19] 22 / 96 -0.40 ± 1.3 -3.00 to 2.20 Xx Xxxxx et al.** [20] 27 / 199 0.14 ± 0.87 -1.60 to 1.88 Cardiac output estimated from cardiac index, ** radial artery pressure used instead of femoral artery pressure. Although these evaluations of the PiCCO pulse contour device reveal acceptable results with respect to the bias (range from -0.40 to 0.31 L/min), the limits of agreement show considerable differences between studies. Possible explanations of these phenomena are probably related to alterations in vascular compliance and to peripheral vascular resistance during the studies. Therefore, in our opinion, due to re- warming during the first few hours on the ICU, a regular recalibration of cardiac output at 4-6 hr intervals seems necessary in postoperative cardiac surgical patients. During our studies [11, 15, 20] two more problems came to light, namely the phenomenon of misclassification of a heartbeat, and false detection of the dicrotic notch in the pressure recording. Under these circumstances we found false high cardiac output values in combination with a false high value of stroke volume variation. In using the radial artery pulse wave with the PiCCO [11], we incidentally also encountered temporarily false low cardiac output values, due to damping of the arterial waveform by clotting and due to local vasospasm after flushing the arterial line. Figure 4a.3 Trend recording of an individual patient. Observation moments are indicated by A to E. Solid line cardiac output (CO) by the continuous thermodilution method (CCO). At point A PiCCO’s pulse contour method is calibrated. At the observation moments, the bolus thermodilution CO is indicated by symbol ! and PiCCO's pulse contour CO is indicated by symbol &. Why not comparing PCCO with COao?
Table 4A. 1 Indicator Threshold / Trend Pressure Lands and waters managed by local communities Trend towards central government control subject to local consultation process. Complex legislative, political regulatory requirements Access to traditional coastal and marine resource rights Trend towards access restrictions and reduced marine resource rights Increasing competition for space. Limits to marine resource availability
Table 4A. 1: Summary of Stage 3 Site Assessment ICOL Site Referenc e Factors in favour of the site Factors against the site Stage 4 Assesse d Yes/No PL1 – adjacent to Preston Links Proximity to connection point. Access from road system. Site is within single ownership and is partly located with an area safeguarded for use as or in association with a power generating station. Whole site located in designated area of open space in local plan policy C3. Potentially high landscape and visual impacts, proximity to European, and national environmental designations, presence of utilities and redundant mine shaft. Proximity of consented Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) plant and gas pipeline at Cockenzie a potential spatial and temporal conflict during construction. Land not available. No PL2 – adjacent to Cockenzie Substation Proximity to connection point. Access from road system. Site is within single ownership and is partly located with an area safeguarded for use as or in association with a power generating station. Site located in area of designated area of open space in local plan policy C3. Potentially high landscape and visual impacts. Proximity of consented Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) plant and gas pipeline at Cockenzie a potential spatial and temporal conflict during construction. High risk site due to being directly under high voltage overhead lines. Congestion of new and existing buried electricity cables. Land not available. No PL3 – at or around Coal Store Proximity to connection point. Access from road system. Incorporates areas of xxxxxxxxxx land. Site is within single ownership and is partly located with an area safeguarded for use as or in association with a power generating station. Potential to mitigate landscape or micro-site development to avoid cultural heritage features. Land potentially available. Proximity to archaeology and cultural heritage features including Waggonway and Prestonpans Battlefield. Proximity to some utilities and redundant mine shaft. Proximity to consented gas pipeline corridor to be considered. Marginally longer onshore cable route than PL1 or PL2. Yes ICOL Site Referenc e Factors in favour of the site Factors against the site Stage 4 Assesse d Yes/No PL4 – north west of Seton Mains West Proximity to connection point. No obvious technical or engineering constraints at substation site. Access from road system. Site located entirely with land designated as Policy DC1 (Development in the Countryside) under the East Lothian L...
Table 4A. 2 Indicator Pressure Magnitude of Impact (high, medium or low) Measure of uncertainty (high, medium or low) Name of Assessor Lands and waters managed by local communities Adoption of central management High Low KJ Access to traditional coastal and marine resource rights Restricted resource rights High Low KJ
Table 4A. 2021 HEPPP, RLP and ELP funding Program 2021 HEPPP* $0 RLP $0 ELP $1,436,448 Allocation of places for the purposes of the ELP For the purposes of section 1.61.1 of Division 5 of Part 3 of Chapter 1 of the Other Grants Guidelines (Education) 2012, the number of Commonwealth supported places allocated to the Provider for 2021- 2023 is 416.0.
