Table A1. Exceptional changes to Table A (to be approved by e-mail or signature by the student, the responsible person in the Sending Institution and the responsible person in the Receiving Institution) Table B1: Exceptional changes to Table B (if applicable) (to be approved by e-mail or signature by the student and the responsible person in the Sending Institution) Component code (if any) Component title at the Receiving Institution (as indicated in the course catalogue) Component without changes [tick if applicable] Deleted component [tick if applicable] Added component [tick if applicable] Reason for changexiii Semester Number of ECTS credits (or equivalent) Component code (if any) Component title at the Sending Institution (as indicated in the course catalogue) Component without changes [tick if applicable] Deleted component [tick if applicable] Added component [tick if applicable] Semester Number of ECTS credits (or equivalent) Others: Total – in original LA (Table A): Total – in original LA (Table B): Total – deleted components: Total – deleted components: Total – added components: Total – added components: Total after changes: Total after changes: Responsible person at the Sending Institution Responsible person at the Receiving Institution i Nationality: country to which the person belongs administratively and that issues the ID card and/or passport. ii Study cycle: Bachelor or equivalent first cycle – EQF level 6); Master or equivalent second cycle – EQF level 7; Doctorate or equivalent third cycle – EQF level 8. iii Field of education: The ISCED-F 2013 search tool available at xxxx://xx.xxxxxx.xx/education/tools/isced-f_en.htm should be used to find the ISCED 2013 detailed field of education and training that is closest to the subject of the degree to be awarded to the student by the Sending Institution.
Table A1. Exceptional changes to Table A (to be approved by e-mail or signature by the student, the responsible person in the Sending Institution and the responsible person in the Receiving Institution) Table B1: Exceptional changes to Table B (if applicable) (to be approved by e-mail or signature by the student and the responsible person in the Sending Institution) Component code (if any) Component title at the Receiving Institution (as indicated in the course catalogue) Component without changes [tick if applicable] Deleted component [tick if applicable] Added component [tick if applicable] Reason for changev Semester Number of ECTS credits (or equivalent) Component code (if any) Component title at the Sending Institution (as indicated in the course catalogue) Component without changes [tick if applicable] Deleted component [tick if applicable] Added component [tick if applicable] Semester Number of ECTS credits (or equivalent) Others: Total – in original LA (Table A): Total – in original LA (Table B): Total – deleted components: Total – deleted components: Total – added components: Total – added components: Total after changes: Total after changes: Responsible person at the Sending Institution Responsible person at the Receiving Institution i Course catalogue: detailed, user-friendly and up-to-date information on the institution’s learning environment that should be available to students before the mobility period and throughout their studies to enable them to make the right choices and use their time most efficiently. The information concerns, for example, the qualifications offered, the learning, teaching and assessment procedures, the level of programmes, the individual educational components and the learning resources. The Course Catalogue should include the names of people to contact, with information about how, when and where to contact them. Lines in the table can be added. Empty lines should be deleted or crossed out.
Table A1. 1 “Subset A of Licensed Patents”, Table A1.2 “Subset B of Licensed Patents”, and Table 1.3 “Background Patents” are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced as follows: [* * *] [* * *] [* * *] [* * *] [* * *] [* * *] [* * *] [* * *] [* * *] [* * *] [* * *] [* * *]
Table A1. Results of a random-effects probit regression of the probability of success, round number (Round), treatments (FULL_ALL, STF, ST, FULL_SCRAMBLE, VEC_SCRABMLE), and interactions between round number and treatment (FULL_Round, STF_Round, ST_Round). Standard errors in brackets; * indicates significant at the 10% level,
Table A1. Summary Statistics for Data Used for Econometric Results on Institutional Gaps and Income Gaps (Figures 4 and 7) Samplea Variable No. observations Mean Standard deviation Minimum Maximum Group 1 ICRG variablesb Log (country’s GDP per capita/USA GDP 414 923 –0.4069638 –1.715673 0.558766 0.579324 –1.75361 –3.65967 0.6972296 –0.3095284 per capita) Group 2 ICRG variablesb Log (country’s GDP per capita/USA GDP 162 378 –0.1312372 –1.328616 0.4356544 0.3673385 –1.00386 –2.19757 0.6972296 –0.3095284 per capita, PPP adjusted)
Table A1. Exceptional changes to Table A (to be approved by e-mail or signature by the student, the responsible person in the Sending Institution and the responsible person in the Receiving Institution) Table B1: Exceptional changes to Table B (if applicable) (to be approved by e-mail or signature by the student and the responsible person in the Sending Institution) Component code (if any) Component title at the Receiving Institution (as indicated in the course catalogue) Component without changes [tick if applicable] Deleted component [tick if applicable] Added component [tick if applicable] Reason for changei Semester Number of ECTS credits (or equivalent) Component code (if any) Component title at the Sending Institution (as indicated in the course catalogue) Component without changes [tick if applicable] Deleted component [tick if applicable] Added component [tick if applicable] Semester Number of ECTS credits (or equivalent) Others: Total – in original LA (Table A): Total – in original LA (Table B): Total – deleted components: Total – deleted components: Total – added components: Total – added components: Total after changes: Total after changes:
Table A1. Orange-fleshed sweet potato varieities received in the full and partial intervention groups of the Quality Diets for Better Health study1 N Full Partial P-difference2 Alamura 68 37 (54.4) 31 (45.6) 0.16 Dilla 67 36 (53.7) 31 (46.3) 0.01 Halaba 53 34 (64.2) 19 (35.8) 0.40 Kabode 48 33 (68.8) 15 (31.3) 0.01 Kulfu 87 46 (52.9) 41 (47.1) 0.27 Naspot12 18 13 (72.2) 5 (27.8) 0.12 Naspot13 19 6 (31.6) 13 (68.4) 0.05 Tule 2 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) NA Vita 23 13 (56.5) 10 (43.5) 0.53 Other 1 0 (0.0) 1 (100.0) NA 1 Values are in row percentages shown as n(%). Full, full intervention (agriculture activities + nutrition/health education + Healthy Baby Toolkit); Partial, partial intervention group (agriculture activities + nutrition/health education). OFSP, orange-fleshed sweet potatoes.
Table A1. 1 This table reflects the proposals and reasoning for how the comments and open issues from HOD 57-2019 and the intersessional commenting by XXX was dealt with by the Group of WG Chairs. Consideration by HOD Proposals and reflections by the online meeting of WG Chairs
Table A1. Comparison between the different studies of China’s export-embodied carbon emissions based on MRIO model.
Table A1. Context analysis – Study-related stakeholders and their expectations. Stakeholder Role Expectations Impact Table A2. Three examples of risk formulation.