Validation experiment Sample Clauses

Validation experiment. Once the hardware in-the-loop simulations are successful the final iteration is full runtime validation of the system without simulated components, i.e. in real conditions. This includes the human diver with disturbances like breathing, unpredicted variations from the path, non-zero roll and pitch, etc.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Validation experiment. PERSONALIZED MEDIA MOBILITY IN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS 19 4.1 Motivation 19 4.2 Validation Experiment 20 4.3 Insights 30 5 VALIDATION EXPERIMENT: COLLABORATIVE INTERACTIVE TRANSMEDIA NARRATIVES 33 5.1 Motivation 33 5.2 Validation Experiment 33 5.3 Insights 33
Validation experiment. AUGMENTED REALITY LOCATION-BASED GAMING 35 6.1 Motivation 35 6.2 Validation Experiment 36 6.3 Insights 41 7 CONCLUSION 43 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. THE JOURNALIST AS A DESIGNER. CREATING TANGIBLE CONVERSATION OPENERS USED IN INTERVIEWS (PHOTO FLAME , 2018 ). 14 FIGURE 2. LOCAL NEWS ROOM ACTIVITIES. INCOMING INTERVIEW (PHOTO XXXX XXXXX, VRT INNOVATION, 2018) 14 FIGURE 3. STUDENTS EXPLORE THE INTERACTIVE MEDIA TRAIL WITH BRISTOL’S SUSTAINABLE FUTURE PLANS AND UNSDG AS THEMES (PHOTO XXXX XXXXX, VRT INNOVATION, 2019). 14 FIGURE 4. PARTICIPANTS EXPLAIN THEIR VISION ON THE CITY’S FUTURE AND THE ROLE OF NEW INTERACTIVE MEDIA TO SMART CITY EXPERTS (PHOTO XXXX XXXXX, VRT INNOVATION, 2019). 14 FIGURE 5. SERVICE FUNCTION CHAIN USED DURING THE SECOND EXPERIMENT. THE BACKEND FUNCTIONED AS A CONTROLLER SERVICE FOR THE WEB APPLICATION ON THE CLIENT. UPLOADED VIDEOS WERE TRANSCODED IN CHUNKS TO BE SERVED FOR THE ADAPTIVE STREAMING SERVICE. FIGURE 6. SIGN ‘ENVIRONMENT’ ATTACHED TO A BENCH ON MILLENNIUM SQUARE (PHOTO XXXX XXXXX, VRT INNOVATION, 2019) 15 FIGURE 7. SCREENSHOTS OF THE VR APP. WE SEE THE CORRESPONDING TOPIC ‘ENVIRONMENT’ (SCREENSHOT XXXXX XXXXX, VRT INNOVATION, 2019) 15 FIGURE 8. A PARTICIPANT PRESENTS HIS LEARNINGS IN THE FIRST EXPERIMENT (PHOTO XXXXX XXXXX, VRT INNOVATION, 2019). 16 FIGURE 9: PMM SCENARIO 1 -DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONAL MEDIA IN WALKING AREAS IN BARCELONA 20 FIGURE 10: PMM SCENARIO 2 - PMM FOR MULTIPLE CONCURRENT STREAMS WITHIN THE SMART CITY 20 FIGURE 11: PMM TRIAL BARCELONA – INITIAL DEPLOYMENT 21 FIGURE 12:PMM TRIAL BARCELONA – SCALE-OUT TRIGGER CONDITION 21 FIGURE 13: PMM TRIAL BARCELONA – SCALE-OUT CONFIGURATION 22 FIGURE 14. PMM TRIAL BARCELONA - MAP AND CHECKPOINTS 23 FIGURE 15: DRY RUN PHASE 1 (NO SCALE OUT FUNCTION) 24 FIGURE 16: DRY RUN PHASE 2 (SCALE OUT FUNCTION ACTIVATED) 25 FIGURE 17: PUBLIC TRIAL ACTIVE STREAMS OVER GATEWORKS 25 FIGURE 18: PMM TRIAL BARCELONA – VALID FRAMES OVER TOTAL NUMBER 29 FIGURE 19: PERCENTAGES OF CORRUPTED FRAMES 29 FIGURE 20: FRAMES DIVIDED PER DISTORTION DEGREES 30 FIGURE 21: BLOCKNESS FRAMES, MAX, AVERAGE AND MIN VALUES 30 FIGURE 22: AR GNOME SHOP (LEFT). AR GARDEN (MIDDLE). DIFFERENT TREE MODELS IN AR GARDEN (RIGHT) 36 FIGURE 23: THE SPIKE SHORTLY AFTER THE 8:38 MINUTES XXXX IS DUE TO A NEW PLAYER JOINING 37 FIGURE 24: THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF DATA SENT BY THE STORAGE FMS OVER THE TIME OF A GAME FOR DIFFERENT NUMBER OF PLAYERS 38 FIGURE 25: THE TOTAL NUMBER OF REQUESTS SENT TO THE STORAGE FMS OVER THE TIME OF...

Related to Validation experiment

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Laboratory Testing All laboratories selected by UPS Freight for analyzing Controlled Substances Testing will be HHS certified.

  • Validation To validate the notice requirements outlined in Section 5.3, the Assuming Institution shall provide the Receiver (i) an Affidavit of Publication to meet the publication requirements outlined in Section 5.3(a) and (ii) the Assuming Institution will prepare an Affidavit of Mailing in a form substantially similar to Exhibit 2.3B after mailing the seven (7) day Notice to Depositors as required under Section 5.3(b).

  • For Product Development Projects and Project Demonstrations  Published documents, including date, title, and periodical name.  Estimated or actual energy and cost savings, and estimated statewide energy savings once market potential has been realized. Identify all assumptions used in the estimates.  Greenhouse gas and criteria emissions reductions.  Other non-energy benefits such as reliability, public safety, lower operational cost, environmental improvement, indoor environmental quality, and societal benefits.  Data on potential job creation, market potential, economic development, and increased state revenue as a result of the project.  A discussion of project product downloads from websites, and publications in technical journals.  A comparison of project expectations and performance. Discuss whether the goals and objectives of the Agreement have been met and what improvements are needed, if any.

  • LIMITATIONS ON REVERSE ENGINEERING, DECOMPILATION AND DISASSEMBLY You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation.

  • Studies The clinical, pre-clinical and other studies and tests conducted by or on behalf of or sponsored by the Company or its subsidiaries that are described or referred to in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus were and, if still pending, are being conducted in accordance in all material respects with all statutes, laws, rules and regulations, as applicable (including, without limitation, those administered by the FDA or by any foreign, federal, state or local governmental or regulatory authority performing functions similar to those performed by the FDA). The descriptions of the results of such studies and tests that are described or referred to in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus are accurate and complete in all material respects and fairly present the published data derived from such studies and tests, and each of the Company and its subsidiaries has no knowledge of other studies or tests the results of which are materially inconsistent with or otherwise call into question the results described or referred to in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus. Except as described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, neither the Company nor its subsidiaries has received any notices or other correspondence from the FDA or any other foreign, federal, state or local governmental or regulatory authority performing functions similar to those performed by the FDA with respect to any ongoing clinical or pre-clinical studies or tests requiring the termination or suspension of such studies or tests. For the avoidance of doubt, the Company makes no representation or warranty that the results of any studies, tests or preclinical or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company will be sufficient to obtain governmental approval from the FDA or any foreign, state or local governmental body exercising comparable authority.

  • Clinical 2.1 Provides comprehensive evidence based nursing care to patients including assessment, intervention and evaluation.

  • Reverse Engineering The Customer must not reverse assemble or reverse compile or directly or indirectly allow or cause a third party to reverse assemble or reverse compile the whole or any part of the software or any products supplied as a part of the Licensed System.

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Development Phase contractual phase initiated with the approval of ANP for the Development Plan and which is extended during the Production Phase while investments in xxxxx, equipment, and facilities for the Production of Oil and Gas according to the Best Practices of the Oil Industry are required.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.