Scenario 1 definition
Scenario 1. Cases where a Participating Institution decides to terminate its participation in the SMART IRB Agreement altogether and the Institution does not have any current ceded Research and is not currently serving as a Reviewing IRB for any Research under the SMART IRB Agreement.
Scenario 1 means the scenario in which the Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm proceeds to construction and carries out enabling works under the Norfolk Vanguard DCO, including the laying of onshore cable ducts, to benefit the Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm;
Scenario 1. On or after the Funding Commencement Date, there is a failure to make a capital contribution of $20 million, and the non-defaulting Member elects not to make a Cover Loan.
Examples of Scenario 1 in a sentence
Scenario 1 – Upward Trend Scenario 2 – Downward Trend Scenario 3 – Volatile Market Description of Air Bag MechanismThe Certificates integrate an “Air Bag Mechanism” which is designed to reduce exposure to theUnderlying Stock during extreme market conditions.When the Air Bag triggers, a 30-minute period starts.
Scenario 1 – Upward Trend Scenario 2 – Downward Trend Scenario 3 – Volatile Market Description of Air Bag MechanismThe Certificates integrate an “Air Bag Mechanism” which is designed to reduce exposure to the Underlying Stock during extreme market conditions.When the Air Bag triggers, a 30-minute period starts.
Two cost scenarios are analyzed:• Scenario 1 represents publicly‐owned buildings, considers initial costs, energy costs, maintenance costs, and replacement costs without borrowing or taxes.• Scenario 2 represents privately‐owned buildings and includes the same costs as Scenario 1 plus financing of the incremental first costs through increased borrowing with tax impacts including mortgage interest and depreciation deductions.
Scenario 1 reflects the thermal treatment of EPS with energy recovery.
Scenario 1 The listed corporation first triggers the criteria for inadequate level of operations set out in Rule 8.03A of the ACE LR and subsequently triggers the Prescribed Criteria set out in Guidance Note 3.
More Definitions of Scenario 1
Scenario 1 means both (a) the Phase 3 Success Criteria are achieved by June 30, 2028, and (b) FDA Approval is received on or prior to December 31, 2029; provided that, if it is indeterminable whether the Company is in Scenarios 1, 2, 3, or 4, then the Company shall be deemed to be in Scenario 1.
Scenario 1. A friend working at a partner organisation asks you for some data your colleagues recently collected about HIV cases in a particular locality. They plan to offer additional medical/psychosocial support to the community and need to know where to focus their activities. Can you share the data? Would sharing comply with data protection requirements? If so, should you share the data? Why or why not? If you decide to share, what considerations should be made before providing the information? What if there was a particular danger of violence or stigma against HIV positive individuals in the community? What if your friend worked in the government? And, even if we remove the identifying data, are there still risks of sharing? ▶ Where would you turn to find out what you could do? ▶ What should we do? Even if the rules permit it, are there other reasons to not share? ▶ What shouldn’t we do? And why? Scenario 2: You recently collected some data from a local community in an emergency that contains names, addresses and other identifiable information. Your tablet/laptop was running out of battery so you made a quick back-up on a flash drive without protecting Data Playbook Module 7: Responsible Data Practices and Data Protection 51 - 52 D A T A P L A Y B O O K M 7 | S ▷ 10 What can we do vs. What should we do? the data in any way (no password or encryption). You get back to the office and you realise you’ve lost the flash drive. What do you do? What steps could you take before going to collect data to ensure that even if you lost your back-up drive, the data would still be safe? ▶ What can we do? ▶ What should we do? ▶ What shouldn’t we do? Scenario 3: Your office is approached by a large tech company that offers to help you manage your office’s data for free during an emergency. Should you accept this offer? (Options: Tech company #1 has a long and well-reputed history of contributing to humanitarian emergencies and doing charitable work; tech company #2 has large contracts with governments and other companies that could be seen as not respecting privacy or other human rights.) ▶ What can we do? ▶ What should we do? ▶ What shouldn’t we do? Discuss results in plenary. Ask what other ethical dilemmas they should consider. Extra credit Review your organisation’s Data Protection Policy with participants. Invite your IT focal point or Security officer to share about digital and data risks after the scenario exercise. This might provide real context to your National Societie...
Scenario 1. THE PATENTEE WINS THE LAWSUIT In this case, the patentee behaves as a monopolist in choosing the profit-maximizing quantity. Specifically, the patentee chooses the monopoly price pm to maximize p p c q p 1Q p 1 Kp K p1 p (B1) The first-order conditions are then P K 1 p p 1 0 p
Scenario 1 is defined in Section 1.4(a).
Scenario 1. Zero nominal growth – 0 % increase Under Scenario 1, no increase of the total budget is foreseen compared to the overall budget approved for the triennium 2016-2018. The CMS standard salary costs have been applied, including the 2% annual increment to account for the impact of inflation on statutory staff costs (these standard salary costs are maintained throughout all scenarios). In terms of Secretariat staff, this option provides for maintaining all nine regular posts funded by the core budget. The post of Programme Management Assistant (Science, Implementation & Compliance Unit) has been slightly increased from 75% to 80% in order to be in line with UN staff rules and regulations. However, it is worth noting that the effect of the zero-nominal growth actually implies a real reduction, in terms of the staffing, operation and functioning of the Secretariat. For example, four staff members have worked above the percentages covered by the core budget for their position over the period of 2016-2018 and beyond, in order to maintain the basic functioning of the Secretariat based on the MOP mandates. As such, this scenario will actually lead to a decrease in terms of manpower due to the increased uncertainty of possible supplementary funds during the period of 2019-2021. Furthermore, the budget for the organization of MOP8 has been further decreased compared to that allocated in the 2016-2018 budget for the organization of MOP7. The budgets for translations and for the organization of the meetings of the Technical and Standing Committee meetings are also very limited and will need to be complemented with voluntary funding. The costs related to the maintenance and hosting of websites are not covered by this budget, and other operative costs are reduced to a minimum and will allow the Secretariat to maintain very basic services only. Scenario 2: Zero real growth – + 4.04% / Scenario 1 + 2 %/ year as per estimated inflation rate This scenario aims at covering the loss of purchasing power due to inflation, what has not been done for the last 10 years. Estimated at 2% per year, this leads to an increase of 4.04 % in total compared to Scenario 1. It can be regarded as the zero real growth scenario. Scenario 2 includes all elements already included in Scenario
Scenario 1 means each generating station will be constructed separately in any one of the following ways:—
Scenario 1 de overheid biedt individuele opties aan