LIST OF FIGURES. FIGURE PAGE
LIST OF FIGURES vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 Statement of the Problem........................................................................................... 2 Purpose of the Study .................................................................................................. 3 Significance of the Study ........................................................................................... 3
LIST OF FIGURES. Application Site Boundary Figure 2. Potential Economic Flows associated with the proposal Figure 3. DTC Masterplan Figure 4. East Camp Masterplan (extract) Figure 5. Second Gate (extract) Figure 6. Northern Access Road (extract) Figure 7. NAR: Bridge over Llanmaes Brook (extract 003622/B1/01) Figure 8. Site Location Plan: Tremains Farm Figure 9. Illustrative layout Plan: Tremains Farm Figure 10. Site Location Plan: North West camp Figure 11. Illustrative layout Plan: North West camp Figure 12. Site Location Plan: Picketston South West Figure 13. Illustrative layout Plan: Picketston South West Figure 14. Site Location Plan: Stadium / Golf Course Figure 15. Illustrative layout Plan: Stadium / Golf Course Figure 16. Picketston Masterplan (extract) Figure 17. Castleton Masterplan (extract) Figure 18. Air Quality Receptor Locations Appendix 1. Llanfair Community Council response Appendix 2. St Athan Community Council response Appendix 3. Llanmaes Community Council response Appendix 4. Environment Agency Wales response Appendix 5. Countryside Council for Wales response Appendix 6. Glamorgan Gwent Archaeological Trust response Appendix 7. Dwr Cymru Welsh Water response Appendix 8. Vale of Glamorgan Head of Visible Services (Highway development) response Appendix 9. Vale of Glamorgan Head of Visible Services (Drainage) response Appendix 10a. Petition (front page/ letter) from Llanmaes residents Appendix 10b. Petition (front page/ letter) from St Athan residents Appendix 10c. Petition (front page/ letter) from Gileston/ St Athan residents Appendix 10d. Petition (front page/ letter) from Millands Park residents Appendix 10e. Petition (front page/ letter) from Boverton residents Appendix 10f. Petition (letter and petition) from residents of St Athan Appendix 11. Examples of Letters of Representation Appendix 12. Letter of representation from Cynefin y Werin Appendix 13. Letters of representation from Xxxxx and Vale Friends of the Earth Appendix 14. Letter of representation from Xxxx Xxxx AM Appendix 15. Letter of representation from Xxxxx Xxxxxx AM Appendix 16. Letter of representation from Xxxxxx Xxxxxx AM Appendix 17. Report on the Transport Assessment by specialist transport consultants Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of the Council 4SofTT No. 4 School of Technical Training AAR Airport Access Road ABP Aerospace Business Park ADMS Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System ALC Agricultural Land Classification AM Assembly Member AMP Asset Management Plan ANIS Aircraft N...
LIST OF FIGURES. CHAPTER 1
LIST OF FIGURES. Figure 1 Relationship of IQ to Project Adaptation 12 Figure 2 Baffinland’s Adaptive Management Process 14
LIST OF FIGURES. Figure 1-1. Tidegates on Edison Slough, various top-hinged gates and a Self Regulating Tidegate Figure 1-2. Floodgate, Drainage District 25 – Samish River system Figure 1-3. Floodgate, Drainage District 25 – Samish River system Figure 2-1. Implementation Agreement Coverage Area Figure 2-1A. Implementation Agreement Restoration Area Figure 2-2. Watercourses in the Coverage Area by Classification Figure 2-3A, B and C. Tidegate and Floodgate within the Coverage Area, by Site ID. number Figure 4-1. Top hinge (left) with internal float gate, and a side hinge (right) gate Figure 4-2. XxXxxxx Slough Automatic Regulating Tidegate
LIST OF FIGURES. Figure 1-1. Tidegates on Edison Slough, various top-hinged gates and a Self Regulating Tidegate Figure 1-2. Floodgate, Drainage District 25 – Samish River system Figure 1-3. Floodgate, Drainage District 25 – Samish River system Figure 2-1. Implementation Agreement Coverage Area Figure 2-1A. Implementation Agreement Restoration Area Figure 2-2. Watercourses in the Coverage Area by Classification Figure 2-3A, B and C. Tidegate and Floodgate within the Coverage Area, by Site ID. number Figure 4-1. Top hinge (left) with internal float gate, and a side hinge (right) gate Figure 4-2. XxXxxxx Slough Automatic Regulating Tidegate EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Skagit Delta Tidegates and Fish Initiative is a collaborative, multi-stakeholder process convened by the Western Washington Agricultural Association in March 2006 for the purpose of identifying pathways and protocols for federal, state and local permitting of tidegate and floodgate repair and replacement activities within the Skagit and Samish River deltas. This Agreement will address actions at tidegate and floodgate sites that are under the ownership or control of Drainage, Diking, and/or Irrigation Districts that are Parties to this Agreement. This Implementation Agreement represents a formal commitment by the Western Washington Agricultural Association (WWAA), representing the collective interests of the participating Drainage, Irrigation and Diking Districts within the Skagit and Samish River deltas; the NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS); United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS); and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) to develop a delta-wide landscape approach to address tidegate and floodgate maintenance needs within the Skagit delta area, in conjunction with estuarine habitat restoration goals for recovery of Endangered Species Act (ESA) listed Chinook salmon in the Skagit River system. In addition to the above-named principals, key staff members representing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), the Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE), and the Governor’s Office of Regulatory Assistance have also provided input and support throughout this process. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) has been developed between WWAA, NMFS and WDFW (Appendix E), hereafter referred to collectively as the Parties, to support the development of this Implementation Agreement. This Agreement will facilitate the achievement of functional estuarine habitat restoration within the Skagit del...
LIST OF FIGURES. Figure 1.1 Wan Chai Development Phase II and Central-Wan Chai Bypass – Site Plan Figure 1.2 Designated Projects Figure 1.2a Designated Project 1: Central-Wanchai Bypass (CWB) including its Road Tunnel and Slip Roads Figure 1.2b Designated Project 2: Road P2 and Other Roads which are classified as Primary/District Distributor Roads
LIST OF FIGURES. Figure Description LIST OF TABLES Table Description 2 Petroleum Product Storage LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix Description A Photographs B Environmental Database Review C Subject Site Deeds D Master Site Plan and Maps of the Outlying Parcels of Land Owned by BIPCO E Doswell Combined Cycle Facility Spill Incident Documentation F Chemical Inventory List, XXXX Title III Reporting, RCRA Status and Manifests for the Safety Kleen Part Cleaning Sinks G Underground Storage Tank Documentation H VPDES Stormwater Permit; Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan; and the 1996 and 1997 Annual Inspection Reports I Doswell Treatment Plant Discharge Permit and 1996 NOVs J September 1997 WWTP Groundwater Monitoring Results and Wastewater Treatment Inspection Report for October 2, 1996 K Air Emissions Documentation L Ash Landfill Documentation M Industrial Landfill Documentation N Beneficial Use of Ash
LIST OF FIGURES. Figure Page Figure 2 1. Aerial View of IN5A 2-12 Figure 2 2. Aerial View of WA5A 2-14 Figure 2 3. Aerial View of WI5A 2-15 Figure 2 4. Aerial View of IN4A 2-16 Figure 2 5. Aerial View of NC4A 2-17 Figure 2 6. Aerial View of OK4A 2-18 Figure 2 7. Aerial View of IA3A 2-19 Figure 2 8. Aerial View of NC3A 2-20 Figure 2 9. Aerial View of OK3A 2-21 Figure 5 1. EEM Development Protocol 5-3 Figure 5 2. Histogram of NH3 Emissions 5-20 Figure 5 3. Histogram of NH3 Emissions by Temperature Bin 5-22 Figure 5 4. Histogram of NH3 Emissions by Temperature and Wind Speed Bins 5-23 Figure 5 5. Shapes of Gamma Distribution for Different Parameter Values 5-24 Figure 5 6. NH3 Emissions vs. Temperature, by Animal Type (color-coded by site) 5-27 Figure 5 7. Scatter Plots of NH3 Emissions vs. Temperature, by Wind Speed Bin (wsbin) 5-29 Figure 5 8. Scatter Plots of NH3 Emissions vs. Temperature, by Relative Humidity Bin 5-30 Figure 5 9. NH3 Emissions vs. Relative Humidity, by Animal Type (color-coded by site) 5-31 Figure 5 10. NH3 Emissions vs. Relative Humidity, by Temperature Bin 5-32 Figure 5 11. NH3 Emissions vs. Relative Humidity, by Wind Speed Bin 5-33 Figure 5 12. NH3 Emissions vs. Wind Speed, by Animal Type (color-coded by site) 5-35 Figure 5 13. NH3 Emissions vs. Wind Speed, by Temperature Bin 5-36 Figure 5 14. NH3 Emissions vs. Wind Speed, by Relative Humidity Bin 5-37 Figure 5 15. Box Plots of NH3 Emissions vs. Hour 5-38 Figure 5 16. Summary Statistics for NH3 Emissions vs. Hour 5-39 Figure 5 17. Box Plots of Temperature vs. Hour 5-40 Figure 5 18. Box Plots of Humidity vs. Hour 5-41 Figure 5 19. NH3 Emissions vs. Xxxxxx Xxx 5-42 Figure 5 20. Percent and Number of Observations per Month 5-43 Figure 5 21. Histogram of NH3 Emissions by Animal Type 5-49 Figure 5 22. Histogram of NH3 Emissions by Animal Type and Site 5-50 Figure 5 23. Histogram of Month by Animal Type and Site 5-51 In 2005, the EPA offered animal feeding operations (AFOs) an opportunity to participate in a voluntary consent agreement referred to as the Air Compliance Agreement (Agreement) (70 FR 4958). Under the Agreement, participating AFOs provided the funding for the National Air Emissions Monitoring Study (NAEMS) – a two-year, nationwide emissions monitoring study of animal confinement structures and manure storage and treatment units in the broiler, egg-layer, swine, and dairy industries. The purpose of this study was to gather emissions data that would be used by the EPA to develop emissions-estimatin...
