VOLUME 3: FACTOR 3 –PAST PERFORMANCE Sample Clauses

VOLUME 3: FACTOR 3 –PAST PERFORMANCE. This volume shall contain past performance information regarding recent and relevant contracts. The narrative should clearly identify the contract reference number, name of the contractor, contract title, annual dollar value, period of performance, duration (in years), a description of the work performed, and the labor categories that were used that are similar to this RFP. Offerors shall submit a minimum of one (1) and no more than three (3) Government contracts for the prime Offeror and a minimum of one (1) and no more than three (3) Government contracts from each major subcontractor that are currently in performance or have been awarded during the past three (3) years, from the issue date of this RFP, which are relevant to the portion(s) of the PWS that the prime or major subcontractor is expected to perform. Major subcontractors are defined as members of an Offeror’s overall team who are expected to perform thirty (30) % or more of the proposed cost for this effort. Past Performance for non-major subcontractors shall not be submitted and will not be considered for evaluation. Offerors shall provide a description of how the effort required by the RFP will be assigned for performance by PWS subtask area within the Offeror’s corporate entity and among the proposed major and other subcontractors. This description shall include an estimate of the total contract value that the prime and all major subcontractors are expected to perform. Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts that are the same as or similar in size and complexity to the portion(s) of the PWS that the prime Offeror or applicable major subcontractor is proposed to perform. For example, the past performance efforts provided for the prime shall demonstrate relevant past performance in size and complexity to the PWS task area(s) that the prime is proposed to perform. Similarly, the past performance efforts provided for the major subcontractors shall demonstrate relevant past performance in size and complexity the PWS task area(s) that the applicable major subcontractor is proposed to perform. Data concerning the Offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractor’s past performance information to the Government. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performanc...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to VOLUME 3: FACTOR 3 –PAST PERFORMANCE

  • Past Performance The Government will evaluate the contractor's performance on the NETCENTS-2 Orders provided in Exhibit B, CDRL B001. The PCO will determine the quality of the work performed based on an integrated assessment of data obtained in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS) and information obtained from Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) channels, interviews with customers, program managers and/or contracting officers for NETCENTS-2 task orders. Based on the contractor performance records above, the PCO will determine if there is an expectation that the contractor will successfully perform the required efforts under the unrestricted Application Services contract.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Acceptance/Performance Test 4.7.1 Prior to synchronization of the Power Project, the SPD shall be required to get the Project certified for the requisite acceptance/performance test as may be laid down by Central Electricity Authority or an agency identified by the central government to carry out testing and certification for the solar power projects.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Key Performance Indicators 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

  • Attainment on Performance Indicators The District will be responsible for overseeing the academic programs offered in its schools and ensuring that those programs meet or exceed state and local expectations for levels of attainment on the statewide performance indicators, as specified in 1 CCR 301-1.

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.