Weekly Progress Meetings & Schedule Updates. The Design-Builder shall schedule and conduct, at a minimum, weekly progress meetings at which the Department, the Architect, the Program Manager, the Design-Builder and appropriate Subcontractors can discuss the status of the Work. The Design-Builder shall prepare and promptly distribute meeting minutes. In addition, the Design-Builder shall submit bi-weekly Schedule updates which shall reflect actual conditions of Project progress as of the date of the update. The update shall reflect the actual progress of construction, identify any developing delays, regardless of their cause, and reflect the Design-Builder’s best projection of the actual date by which Substantial Completion and Final Completion of the Project will be achieved. Via a narrative statement (not merely a critical path method schedule), the Design-Builder shall identify the causes of any potential delay and state what, in the Design-Builder's judgment, must be done to avoid or reduce that delay. The Design-Builder shall point out, in its narrative, changes that have occurred since the last update, including those related to major changes in the scope of work, activities modified since the last update, revised projections of durations, progress and completion, revisions to the schedule logic or assumptions, and other relevant changes. Any significant variance from the previous schedule or update shall also be identified in a narrative, together with the reasons for the variance and its impact on Project completion. All Schedule updates shall be in a native format reasonably acceptable to the Department (e.g., Primavera). The Department may make reasonable requests during the Project for changes to the format or for further explanation of information provided. Submission of updates showing that Substantial Completion or Final Completion of the Project will be achieved later than the applicable scheduled completion date shall not constitute requests for extension of time and shall not operate to change the scheduled completion date(s). The Department’s receipt of, and lack of objection to, any schedule update showing Substantial Completion or Final Completion later than the dates agreed upon in the Project Schedule shall not be regarded as the Department’s agreement that the Design-Builder may have an extension of time, or as a waiver of any of the Department’s rights, but merely as the Design-Builder’s representation that, as a matter of fact, Substantial Completion or Final Completion of the...
Weekly Progress Meetings & Schedule Updates. The Design-Builder shall schedule and conduct, at a minimum, weekly progress meetings at which the Department, the Architect, the Program Manager, the Design-Builder and appropriate Subcontractors can discuss the status of the Work. The Design-Builder shall prepare and promptly distribute meeting minutes. In addition, the Design-Builder shall submit bi-weekly Schedule updates which shall reflect actual conditions of Project progress as of the date of the update. The update shall reflect the actual progress of construction, identify any developing delays, regardless of their cause, and reflect the Design-Builder’s best projection of the actual date by which Substantial Completion and Final Completion of the Project will be achieved. Via a narrative statement (not merely a critical path method schedule), the Design-Builder shall identify the causes of any potential delay and state what, in the Design-Builder's judgment, must be done to avoid or reduce that delay. The Design-Builder shall point out, in its narrative, changes that have occurred since the last update, including those related to major changes in the scope of work, activities modified since the last update, revised projections of durations, progress and completion, revisions to the schedule logic or assumptions, and other relevant changes. Any significant variance from
Weekly Progress Meetings & Schedule Updates. The Design-Builder shall schedule and conduct, at a minimum, weekly progress meeting at which the Department, the Architect, the Project Manager, the Design-Builder and appropriate Subcontractors can discuss the status of the Work. The Design-Builder shall prepare and promptly distribute meeting minutes. In addition, the Design-Builder shall submit bi-weekly Schedule updates
Weekly Progress Meetings & Schedule Updates. The Contractor shall schedule and conduct, at a minimum, weekly progress meetings following a Contractor generated agenda at which the Department, the A/E, the Program Manager, the Contractor, and appropriate Subcontractors can discuss the status of the Work. The Contractor shall prepare and promptly distribute meeting minutes. In addition, the Contractor shall submit bi-weekly Schedule updates which shall reflect actual conditions of Project progress as of the date of the update. The update shall reflect the actual progress of construction, identify any developing delays, regardless of their cause, and reflect the Contractor’s best projection of the actual date by which Substantial Completion and Final Completion of the Project will be achieved. Via a narrative statement (not merely a critical path method schedule), the Contractor shall identify the causes of any potential delay and state what, in the Contractor's judgment, must be done to avoid or reduce that delay. The Contractor shall point out, in its narrative, changes that have occurred since the last update, including those related to major changes in the scope of work, activities modified since the last update, revised projections of durations, progress and completion, revisions to the schedule logic or assumptions, and other relevant changes. Any significant variance from the previous schedule or update shall also be identified in a narrative, together with the reasons for the variance and its impact on Project completion. All schedule updates shall be in a native format reasonably acceptable to the Department (e.g.,
