Progress Update Sample Clauses

Progress Update. Information included with the annual Data Access Request (DAR) renewal or Closeout summarizing the analysis of controlled-access datasets obtained through the DAR and any publications and presentations derived from the work.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (203)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Progress Update. (Attach assessment results) If necessary, document changes to the SLO: SUMMATIVE CONFERENCE The student growth rating will be discussed during the end-of-year Summative Conference. (Attach posttest results in a chart). Scoring:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Progress Update. Dear Members of the Toronto Executive Committee and City Council, The TCBN is a community-labour coalition with over 120 member organizations and groups from community, labour and social enterprise. The network has centred itself at the forefront of the economic justice movement in Canada by negotiating Community Benefits Agreements (CBAs) into public infrastructure and urban development projects. In so doing, TCBN is addressing the challenges of access to good jobs, local economic development and neighbourhood revitalization particularly as they impact on historically disadvantaged communities and equity seeking groups in Toronto. Through the RexdaleRising campaign, TCBN was successful in working with member networks, local community organizations and residents to advocate and secure the City of Toronto’s first Community Benefits Agreement. Currently, we are one of the stakeholders who are part of the Community Benefits Oversight Working Group for the Casino Woodbine CBA. We would like to thank One Toronto Gaming and City of Toronto staff for preparing this update report on the progress of the Casino Woodbine CBA. Public reporting on outcomes is an important element for CBAs and transparency that all projects should follow including proper monitoring, tracking and reporting frameworks agreed to in advance with the community. We are encouraged by the social hiring targets that have been surpassed for construction (28%) and operations (48%) however we are concerned about local hiring targets that have failed to be met in both of these areas (2% construction, 10% operations). We acknowledge the efforts being made by One Toronto Gaming, City staff and local organizations to engage community members in the Rexdale local area for operations positions and we encourage One Toronto Gaming to support partnerships, training and lead targeted outreach activities in the local community, especially as new and non-gaming related positions open up this year. As it relates to the construction opportunities as part of the project, we are extremely disappointed by the poor outcomes for local hiring in construction and the lack of transparency in providing disaggregated data on the hiring from equity seeking groups. Such disaggregated data was provided in the employment operations report and should be included in future reporting. As project owner, One Toronto Gaming should educate, inform and regularly engage contractors and subcontractors to ensure hiring commitments are f...
Sample 1
Progress Update. On March 21, 2023, Executive Committee received for information the 2022 progress update for the Rexdale-Casino Woodbine Community Benefits Agreement. xxxxx://xxxxxx.xxxxxxx.xx/council/xxxxxx-xxxx.xx?item=2023.EX3.10
Sample 1
Progress Update. One round of Section 319 applications was scored but the resulting Project Work Plans were largely unfocused and oftentimes vague. Specific problems involved plans not being targeted towards BMPs for water bodies with TMDLs without extensive editing. Many applicants asked for funding to be spent across a watershed or county without regard for critical areas. Some wanted to further study an area for which sufficient data had been collected but hadn’t been used. This “pre-test” of Project Work Plans highlighted challenges that can focus future efforts. MPCA plans to hire a new staff (0.5 FTE) to develop guidance documents, conduct training, and revise the request for grant applications to improve this situation. This staff person will be overseen by the Statewide Administration Supervisor and the Metro Watershed Section Manager.
Sample 1
Progress Update. One round of Section 319 applications was scored but the resulting Project Work Plans were largely unfocused and oftentimes vague. Specific problems involved plans not being targeted towards BMPs for water bodies with TMDLs without extensive editing. Many applicants asked for funding to be spent across a watershed or county without regard for critical areas. Some wanted to further study an area for which sufficient data had been collected but hadn’t been used. This “pre-test” of Project Work Plans highlighted challenges that can focus future efforts. MPCA plans to hire a new staff (0.5 FTE) to develop guidance documents, conduct training, and revise the request for grant applications to improve this situation. This staff person will be overseen by the Statewide Administration Supervisor and the Metro Watershed Section Manager. FFY 2017 Report EPA reviewed and approved MPCA’s FY17 Workplan. Based on issues raised during the course of EPA’s review, however, MPCA requested in October 2017 a two-year waiver from the Section 319 guidelines, in order to choose a number of small watersheds and create detailed nine-element watershed based plans (9E-WBP), similar to detailed grant work plans, for each small watershed. EPA is in the process of completing its review of MPCA’s request. If approved, FFY2018 and 2019 Section 319 monies would fund projects as described in the waiver request, until several 9E-WBP can be reviewed and approved by U.S. EPA.
Sample 1
Progress Update. One round of Section 319 applications was scored but the resulting Project Work Plans were largely unfocused and oftentimes vague. Specific problems involved plans not being targeted towards BMPs for water bodies with TMDLs without extensive editing. Many applicants asked for funding to be spent across a watershed or county without regard for critical areas. Some wanted to further study an area for which sufficient data had been collected but hadn’t been used. This “pre-test” of Project Work Plans highlighted challenges that can focus future efforts. MPCA plans to hire a new staff (0.5 FTE) to develop guidance documents, conduct training, and revise the request for grant applications to improve this situation. This staff person will be overseen by the Statewide Administration Supervisor and the Metro Watershed Section Manager. FFY 2017 Report EPA reviewed and approved MPCA’s FY17 Workplan. Based on issues raised during the course of EPA’s review, however, MPCA requested in October 2017 a two-year waiver from the Section 319 guidelines, in order to choose a number of small watersheds and create detailed nine-element watershed based plans (9E-WBP), similar to detailed grant work plans, for each small watershed. EPA is in the process of completing its review of MPCA’s request. If approved, FFY2018 and 2019 Section 319 monies would fund projects as described in the waiver request, until several 9E-WBP can be reviewed and approved by U.S. EPA. FFY 2018 Report On October 23, 2017, US EPA Region 5 granted a two-year waiver for FFY2018 and FFY 2019 from meeting the WBP requirements. For FFY2018, Section 319 funds continued to be competitively funded under the temporary waiver of the 9E-WBP requirement. Several meetings were held from December 2017 to mid-summer with local partners to discuss the intent and proposed designs of the new Section 319 program, branded “Section 319 Small Watersheds Focus” and often referred to as 319 Focus for short. Once the program design was settled upon, MPCA issued a continuously open request for interest. Once we received a sufficient number of expressions of interest (approximately 40), the interested LGUs were evaluated. The 19 likely recipients were interviewed at their sites across the state. From these requests, 10 were prioritized for funding beginning in 2020. These prioritized watersheds are spread across the state geographically, honoring the Minnesota Watershed Approach and meeting our state priorities. Pass-through funds...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Progress Update. The SIA may also provide periodic status update reports highlighting critical issues to the Purchaser. Further, any information (progress report, etc.) as and when sought by the Purchaser shall be furnished by the SIA.
Sample 1

Related to Progress Update

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Progress Reports The Recipient shall submit to the OPWC, at the OPWC's request, summary reports detailing the progress of the Project pursuant to this Agreement and any additional reports containing such information as the OPWC may reasonably require.

  • Project/Milestones Taxpayer is a multinational defense contractor specializing in the development and manufacture of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance and detection systems. Taxpayer has certified in its application that absent award of the CCTC, its project may occur in another state; and, it may terminate all or a portion of its employees in California or relocate all or a portion of its employees in California to another state. In consideration for the Credit, Taxpayer agrees to hire full-time employees and invest in manufacturing and computer equipment, furniture and fixtures, and tenant improvements as part of its expansion in Anaheim, California (collectively, the “Project”). Further, Taxpayer agrees to satisfy the milestones as described in Exhibit A (“Milestones”) and must maintain Milestones for a minimum of three (3) taxable years thereafter. In the event Taxpayer employs more than the number of full-time employees, determined on an annual full-time equivalent basis, than required in Exhibit A, for purposes of satisfying the “Minimum Annual Wage of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Wage of California Full-time Employees Hired,” Taxpayer may use the wages of any of the full-time employees hired within the required time period. For purposes of calculating the “Minimum Annual Wage of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Wage of California Full-time Employees Hired,” the wage of any full-time employee that is not employed by Taxpayer for the entire taxable year shall be annualized. In addition, the wage of any full-time employee hired to fill a vacated position in which a full-time employee was employed during Taxpayer’s Base Year shall be disregarded.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!