WHAT IS THE LAWSUIT ABOUT Sample Clauses

WHAT IS THE LAWSUIT ABOUT. A settlement has been proposed in a class action against Generac Power Systems, Inc. (“Generac”). The case concerns an Inspection Notice Letter that was sent to owners of certain Generac air cooled home standby generators in specific regions of the United States for units that were manufactured between 2008 - 2016. The Inspection Notice Letter offered inspections of the generators’ fuel plenums for a discounted $80 fee that would be refunded if a plenum had significant corrosion (the “Inspection Program”). The Plaintiffs claimed that Generac should not have had a fee associated with the inspection, and that doing so amounted to a breach of its express and implied warranties. Generac denies any liability and maintains that it did not violate any warranties. Generac has historically instructed and expected Authorized Service Dealers to examine fuel systems (including the fuel plenum) during any general maintenance or service visits. The parties subsequently settled the lawsuit in order to avoid the costs, uncertainty, and inconvenience of litigation. The Settlement does not include, or release, any claims for personal injury, property damage (other than damage to the Class Generators related to the plenum), or subrogation.
Sample 1Sample 2
WHAT IS THE LAWSUIT ABOUT. The lawsuit asserts that a part on your Civic was defectively designed, and that as a result the tires on some Civics wore out unevenly or prematurely. Honda denies that there was any defect on the Civics. There are no safety concerns for owners of these vehicles.
Sample 1
WHAT IS THE LAWSUIT ABOUT. A lawsuit was brought by Plaintiffs against Defendant following fires that occurred at Defendant’s facility located at 00000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Rd., Crosby, Texas 77532, during Hurricane Xxxxxx in late August and early September 2017. Plaintiffs allege that the fires caused harm to persons and property. Defendant denies that there is any factual or legal basis for Plaintiffs’ allegations. Plaintiffs contend that the fires deposited dioxin compounds on properties surrounding Defendant’s Xxxxxx facility at a level that poses a risk to human health or the environment. Defendant contends that the fires did not result in any harm or risk of harm to persons or property. In the lawsuit, Defendant has asserted defenses to the claims raised by Plaintiffs on behalf of the Class. The Court has not determined whether Plaintiffs or Defendant is correct. This lawsuit is a class action. A class action is a lawsuit in which the claims and rights of many people are decided in a single court proceeding. One or more people—sometimes called “class representatives”—sue on behalf of people who may have similar claims. All of the people who may have similar claims form a “class” and are “class members.” A settlement in a class action—if approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate—resolves the claims for all class members.
Sample 1
WHAT IS THE LAWSUIT ABOUT. The lawsuit or Action is known as Xxxx Xxxxxxx v. LifeLock, Inc., Case No 1-15-cv-276235, currently pending in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Xxxxx. Judge Xxxxx Xxxxxx is in charge of the Action. The person who sued is the Plaintiff or Class Representative and the company he sued, LIFELOCK, is the Defendant. The Action claims that the process by which LIFELOCK subscription plan members enrolled failed to disclose the automatically renewing nature of the membership as required by California’s Automatic Renewal Law (Business and Professions Code sections 17600, et seq.). Based upon this alleged statutory violation, the Class Representative also asserts claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law (Business and Professions Code sections 17200, et seq.). LIFELOCK denies all allegations. The Court did not decide that there is any merit to the claims in the Action or that any recovery from LIFELOCK is appropriate. Instead, both sides agreed to a Settlement. That way, they avoid the costs and delay of further legal proceedings and the Class Members will get the benefits of the Settlement. This description of the Action is general and does not cover all of the issues and proceedings that have occurred. In order to see the complete file, you should visit the Clerk’s office at the Santa Xxxxx County Superior Court located at 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx 00000. The Clerk will tell you how to obtain the file for inspection and copying at your own expense. You may also visit the e-filing website of the Santa Xxxxx County Superior Court, xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx/ and enter the case number, 1-15-CV-276235, for more information.
Sample 1
WHAT IS THE LAWSUIT ABOUT. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants improperly charged certification and retrieval fees for health care records requests made by patients and persons authorized in writing by the patient to receive those health care records.
Sample 1
WHAT IS THE LAWSUIT ABOUT. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants Xxxxx & Associates, LLC, Zen Life Holdings, Inc., Xxx Xxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx (“Defendants”) violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq., by sending unsolicited fax advertisements lacking compliant opt-out provisions prior to July 19, 2023. Defendants deny all liability and wrongdoing whatsoever. The Court has not ruled on the merits of Plaintiff’s claims or Defendants’ defenses.
Sample 1
WHAT IS THE LAWSUIT ABOUT. Plaintiff alleges that Xxxxxx Healthcare, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Molina”) violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq., by sending facsimile transmissions through a third-party entity, Southwest Medical Consulting, LLC, on or after April 12, 2013, concerning Defendant’s building of its provider networks. Molina denies all liability and wrongdoing whatsoever. The Court has not ruled on the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims or Defendant’s defenses.
Sample 1
WHAT IS THE LAWSUIT ABOUT. In this Litigation, the Plaintiffs alleged individual and class action claims against NIBCO asserting that the Covered Products are defective and prone to leak causing water damage. There are two class action lawsuits that are being settled. The term “
Sample 1
WHAT IS THE LAWSUIT ABOUT. In this Litigation, Plaintiffs alleged individual and class action claims against Xxx asserting that the Covered Products are defective and prone to leaks causing water damage. Bow denies the claims and allegations in the Litigation, including that the Covered Products are defective. Xxx further denies that it violated any law, engaged in any wrongdoing, or owes any liability in this case to Plaintiffs or anyone else. Bow is settling to avoid the expense, inconvenience, risk, and disruption of further litigation. The Settlement is not an admission of any liability. The Court has not considered the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims or Bow’s defenses. This Notice is not an expression of any opinion or judgment by the Court on the claims alleged in the Litigation.
Sample 1

Related to WHAT IS THE LAWSUIT ABOUT

  • Tax Status Non Jurisdictional Entities Tax Status.‌‌ Each Party shall cooperate with the other Parties to maintain the other Parties’ tax status. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to adversely affect the tax status of any Party including the status of NYISO, or the status of any Connecting Transmission Owner with respect to the issuance of bonds including, but not limited to, Local Furnishing Bonds. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, LIPA, NYPA and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. shall not be required to comply with any provisions of this Agreement that would result in the loss of tax-exempt status of any of their Tax-Exempt Bonds or impair their ability to issue future tax-exempt obligations. For purposes of this provision, Tax-Exempt Bonds shall include the obligations of the Long Island Power Authority, NYPA and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., the interest on which is not included in gross income under the Internal Revenue Code. LIPA and NYPA do not waive their exemptions, pursuant to Section 201(f) of the FPA, from Commission jurisdiction with respect to the Commission’s exercise of the FPA’s general ratemaking authority.

  • Lobbying Activities - Standard Form - LLL No response Do not upload this form unless Vendor has reportable lobbying activities. There are Attributes entitled, “2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Xxxx Anti-Lobbying Amendment – Continued.” Properly respond to those Attributes and only upload this form if applicable/instructed. If upload is required based on your response to those Attributes, the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities – Standard Form - LLL must be downloaded from the “Attachments” section of the IonWave eBid System, reviewed, properly completed, and uploaded to this location.

  • Entities that Boycott Israel Contractor represents and warrants that (1) it does not, and shall not for the duration of the Contract, boycott Israel or (2) the verification required by Section 2271.002 of the Texas Government Code does not apply to the Contract. If circumstances relevant to this provision change during the course of the Contract, Contractor shall promptly notify System Agency.

  • Certification Regarding Business with Certain Countries and Organizations Pursuant to Subchapter F, Chapter 2252, Texas Government Code, PROVIDER certifies it is not engaged in business with Iran, Sudan, or a foreign terrorist organization. PROVIDER acknowledges this Purchase Order may be terminated if this certification is or becomes inaccurate.

  • What Law Applies – This Agreement is subject to all applicable federal and state laws and regulations. If it is necessary to apply any state law to interpret and administer this Agreement, the law of the Custodian’s domicile shall govern. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or invalid, the remaining parts shall not be affected. Neither the IRA Owner nor the Custodian’s failure to enforce at any time or for any period of time any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of such provisions, or either party’s right thereafter to enforce each and every such provision.

  • Opinion of Intellectual Property Counsel for the Company Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx, Professional Corporation, intellectual property counsel for the Company, shall have furnished to the Representatives, at the request of the Company, their written opinion, dated the Closing Date or the Additional Closing Date, as the case may be, and addressed to the Underwriters, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Representatives.

  • Letter of Understanding Professional Responsibility For the life of this Collective Agreement, the parties agree as follows: The parties acknowledge and agree that professional responsibility concerns are most appropriately resolved expeditiously between them in the workplace. The parties commit to exhausting all reasonable efforts, which may include third party mediation, before an IAC hearing is conducted. The parties agree that resident care is enhanced if concerns relating to professional practice and workload are resolved in a timely and effective manner. The parties acknowledge that in most cases they will be able to find a resolution to these concerns. In exceptional circumstances, where concerns are not resolved, either party may proceed to an IAC hearing as they are entitled to under Article 19.01 of the Collective Agreement. Where the local parties enter into these agreements, the agreement may include one or more of the following principles:

  • Anti-Money Laundering and Identity Theft Prevention Related Duties Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Trust hereby delegates to the Transfer Agent the Delegated Anti-Money Laundering Duties and, where applicable, the Delegated Identity Theft Prevention Duties that are set forth in the Trust’s Anti-Money Laundering (“AML”) Program and Identity Theft Prevention Program (“IDTPP”) as described below. The Transfer Agent agrees to perform the Delegated Anti-Money Laundering Duties and the Delegated Identity Theft Prevention Duties, with respect to ownership of shares in the Fund for which the Transfer Agent maintains the applicable information subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract.

  • Type and Jurisdiction of Organization, Organizational and Identification Numbers The type of entity of such Grantor, its state of organization, the organizational number issued to it by its state of organization and its federal employer identification number are set forth on Exhibit A.

  • Foreign Terrorist Organizations Contractor represents and warrants that it is not engaged in business with Iran, Sudan, or a foreign terrorist organization, as prohibited by Section 2252.152 of the Texas Government Code.