We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION Sample Clauses

DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIONOn December 20, 2006, Plaintiff Xxxxx Xxxxx (together with Frenchola Holden and Xxxxx XxXxxxxx) (collectively, the “Named Plaintiffs”) filed this Action against Defendants GMAC Mortgage, LLC (“GMAC Mortgage”), GMAC Bank (now known, and hereinafter referred to, as Ally Bank), and Cap Re of Vermont, LLC (“Cap Re”) (collectively, “Defendants”) (Defendants together with the Named Plaintiffs, the “Parties”). The Action was filed as a proposed class action. Named Plaintiffs allege that the portions of the mortgage insurance premiums that certain non-party private mortgage insurance providers ceded to Cap Re were disguised kickbacks paid for the referral of private mortgage insurance business. Named Plaintiffs allege that Defendants’ conduct violated Section 8 of the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq. On May 14, 2012, GMAC Mortgage and certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”). Pursuant to an order of the Bankruptcy Court, the Debtorschapter 11 cases are being jointly administered and are styled In re Residential Capital, LLC, No. 12- 12020-MG (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). On July 3, 2013, the Debtors and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors filed that certain Joint Chapter 11 Plan Proposed by Residential Capital, LLC, and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (as may be modified, amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Chapter 11 Plan”). On November 19, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court commenced a hearing in connection with confirmation of the Chapter 11 Plan. A copy of the Chapter 11 Plan and related documents is available at xxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxx. Defendants deny all of Named Plaintiffs’ claims and deny any wrongdoing and any liability to Named Plaintiffs or any Class Members, in any amount. Defendants contend that Named Plaintiffs’ claims have no merit and that Defendants would prevail in the Action. Class Counsel have investigated the facts and the applicable law regarding the matters raised in the Action. Class Counsel believe that the issues before the Court are complex and are further complicated by the pending Chapter 11 Cases. Given these complications and the uncertainty as to the outcome of the Action, there is a risk that Named Plaintiffs could recover nothing. Absent the Settlement, the Chapter...
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIONOverall objective, specific objective(s), expected outputs and indicative activities
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. Title Title of the action Applicant Name of the institution/organisation responsible for implementing the action Other organisation(s) involved Names Time frame Start and end date of the action
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. The purpose of Work Package 6 in the SIMSTAT Pilot ESSnet1 is to evaluate the quality of statistics produced using exchanged dispatch micro data to assess the usability of micro data exchange in a possible future SIMSTAT setup. The Work Package has three objectives: 6.1. Proposal for an analysis plan to evaluate the quality of the statistics to be produced during the ESSnet work. The plan should include both the production of short-term estimates and the production of detailed data 6.2. Compilation and quality evaluation of statistics using the data exchanged during the ESSnet. Each participating Member State should compile and analyse the data concerning their own economy obtained from other Member States.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. The VCAP was a starting point for close collaboration between industry, science and the government focused on getting sustainable innovations on the market by using a unique partnership of different parties involved and influencing national and European regulators in order to make room for these innovations. The VCAP is a voluntary agreement. The network was built with 20 parties on an equal basis, and is enlarged with other frontrunners in the value chain (34 parties in 2016).
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. ‌ The purpose of the SIMSTAT-Pilot ESSnet project is for the preparation for exchange of micro-data on intra EU trade between Member States (MS) to enable the exchange of micro data (enterprise level) on intra-EU exports on trade in goods between Member States. So once the data exchange network is operational, the functioning of the system can be tested in a “production like” environment. SIMSTAT-Pilot ESSnet project members will evaluate all MS information on the compilation, production and dissemination of Intrastat trade statistics and find common agreements concerning a number of practical statistical aspects of the project which are common to all participants in the test. These agreements are required to be achieved in order to prepare for conduction the trial exchange of micro data in a coordinated way and to test the future IT system for micro-data exchange. The results of this project will influence the future of SIMSTAT micro data exchange and will be reported to Eurostat and the ESSC. The purpose of Work Package 4 (WP4) is: Designing the production timetable for the trial test adjusted to the production timetables of the MS’s and the current legal framework. The timetable should accommodate the impact of late responses and data corrections. WP4 is split into 3 sub task: 4.1: Draft proposal for the production timetable with regard to the future “production test” context where data transmission network will be used. 4.2: Proposal for the timing and practices of data extractions and data exchange in ESSnet context in order to simulate the future “production test” timetable.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIONThe grant awarded aims at implementing the activities as they are described in the application form: Submitted by: […] For the project whose title is: […] Registered by the Executive Agency under the reference: […] Having received the contract number: […] Any change to the activities needs to be explicitly authorised by the Executive Agency.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. 1.1 The Plaintiffs contend that Entertainers performing at the adult clubs doing business as The Library Gentlemen’s Club – Westminster CA; The Library Gentlemen’s Club – Anaheim; and The Library Gentlemen’s Club – Redlands (the “Clubs”) should have been treated as employees rather than as independent contractors and as a result were entitled to but did not receive adequate compensation and benefits in exchange for the services they provided to the Clubs. Plaintiffs further contend, among other things, that Defendants failed to pay overtime, failed to provide meal and rest periods, failed to pay wages, failed to reimburse expenses, failed to provide accurate, itemized wage statements, failed to provide workers compensation insurance, that Defendants were engaged in unlawful tip-sharing arrangements with the Entertainers and that Defendants violated the Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) (Cal. Labor Code §§ 2699, et seq.) and Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) (29 U.S. Code §§ 201 et. seq.) Defendants in the Action dispute and deny any The United States District Court for the Central District of California has not ruled on the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. The Scientific proposal from the grant application. Includes Activity plan.
DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION. It is suggested that this be drafted in very wide terms so that it encompasses all possible causes of action and remedies. Note, the Conditions include an appeal and so if it is not intended for the CFA to apply to any appeal this should be stated expressly in the definition of the Action.