Xxxxxx St. Xxxxx Xxx L.L.C.
Xxxxxx St. Xxxx Beach, California 90808 Attention: Chief Financial Officer; Chief Legal Officer Email: with a copy to: Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx LLP 000 Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx, 00xx Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxx, XX 00000 Attention: Email: All such notices, requests and other communications hereunder shall be deemed duly given on the date of receipt by the recipient thereof if received before 5:00 p.m. local time on a business day in the place of receipt. Otherwise, any such notice, request or communication shall be deemed to have been received on the next succeeding business day in the place of receipt.
Xxxxxx St. Xxxxxxxx, MI 48170
Xxxxxx St. Makati City. It was formerly known and registered under the name ALG Renewable Energy Holdings, Incorporated. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Filinvest Development Corporation (FDC).
Xxxxxx St. 0 B: 4801, L: 4 6 (Project Approved, Deed Restrictions Pending) +6 28 Xxxxxxxx Xx. 0 B: 5906, L: 10-12 4 (Project Approved, Deed Restrictions Pending) +4 5 So. Park / 2 and 00 Xxxxx Xx. 0 B: 4802, L: 17-19 B: 6001, L: 12 2 Deed-Restricted (one off-site and one on-site) +2
Xxxxxx St. San Xxxx City (hereinafter called “the Supplier”) of the other part;
Xxxxxx St. Xxxxxxxx - (Kingston)
Xxxxxx St. Joseph’s Square is an example of a development that has gone through the planning process and subsequently sold to another developer. The new developer was able to increase the number of units by way of a non-substantial amendment which did not involve a public hearing. Can this happen here? Mr. Agar – He doesn’t have a lot of familiarity with St. Joseph’s Square but development agreements, in general, typically include a section in the agreement that identifies the matters that are non-substantive. The approval of a non-substantive amendment is still subject to the standard appeal process. Xx. Xxxxxx – Basically, some of tonight’s issues might be non-substantive as well. It makes a mockery of the process. Councillor Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx – The building code requires accessible units after a certain number. Xx. Xxxxxx - the building code of Nova Scotia requires one barrier free unit for every 20 units; therefore, this building will have two barrier free units. There are two barrier free parking spaces provided in the parkade to accommodate those two units. Councillor Xxxxx – She encouraged people to write to her and Mr. Agar regarding specific things they would like to see as a result of the project. PAC members would be informed as well. The St. Joseph’s Square amendments were non-substantive. The revisions affected the unit configuration not overall density. She has struggled for a number of years with how to bring families to the area and believes there needs to be a combination of things in the neighbourhood (schools, playgrounds, parks). It is important for people to engage in the public process for the Centre Plan to provide suggestions and comments on issues like the ones mentioned tonight. Xx. Xxxxxxx – Was a wind study at ground level done? Xx. Xxxxxx – The streetwall has a mitigating effect on the wind that will come over the top of the building. The entrances were placed in areas that will be less affected by wind. Normally, the planner will determine if further research is required. Xxxxx XxxXxxxxx, Xxxxx Street – What will be between the two buildings? Xx. Xxxxxx – The streetwalls and the podium will join together. Xx. XxxXxxxxx – She likes the building but is not fussy about the other proposed buildings in the area. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx – Is this a condo or rental building? Mr. Agar – The Municipality doesn’t regulate one or the other. Xx. Xxxxxx – How much parking is there? Mr. Agar – There are 35 units and 27 underground parking spaces proposed. Xx. Xxx...
Xxxxxx St. Buffalo, NY 14021 (a Member of the Advisor/Protector) Xxx X. Xxxxxxx 000 X. Xxxxxx St. Buffalo, NY 14201 (a Member of the Advisor/Protector) and Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Xx. 000 X.
Xxxxxx St. Xxxxxxx, NY 14201 (a Member and the Manager of the Advisor/Protector) The Trustee is the trustee of the Company’s Stock Employee Compensation Trust under an Agreement dated May 3,1994 The Advisor/Protector is a Special-Purpose Entity serving as Investment Advisor, Distribution Protector, and Trust Protector of the Trust. Xxxx X. Xxxxxx, Xxx X. Xxxxxxx, and Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Xx., are Members of the Advisor/Protector (collectively referred to as the “Members”) and Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Xx., is also the Manager of the Advisor/Protector. The Company expressly recognizes that the Trustee, Advisor/Protector, Members, and/or Manager could become exposed (with possible personal liability to the individuals) as a result of performing duties under the Trust or by reason of the various offices discussed above to potential legal risks and liabilities, The Company, Trustee, Advisor/Protector, Members and Manager recognize that the legal risks and potential liabilities associated with lawsuits filed against the Trustee, Advisor/Protector, Members, and Manager could result in substantial expenditure of time, money and energy in defending against such lawsuits. The Company recognizes that the cost of defending against such lawsuits, whether or not meritorious, is beyond the financial resources of the Trustee, Advisor/Protector, Members and Manager. By its FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLETE RESTATEMENT OF COMPUTER TASK GROUP, INCORPORATED STOCK EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION TRUST AND TERMINATION OF TRUST, dated May 20, 2016 (the “Termination”), and incorporated herein by reference, the Trust Protector amended and terminated the Trust. The Trustee is willing to continue to serve as Trustee of the Trust and the Advisor/Protector, Members and Manager are willing to continue to serve in their various capacities with respect to the Trust only in consideration of the protection of this agreement and only as long as necessary to carry out the terms of the Termination (the “Wrapping- Up Period”).
