Xxxxxxx and Associates. Without limiting Landlord’s approval rights, Landlord may withhold its approval of any examiner of Tenant who is representing, or in the case of an examiner other than a Major CPA Firm has within the last two (2) years prior to Xxxxxx’s request represented, any other tenant in the Building. In no event shall Tenant use any examiner who is being paid by Xxxxxx on a contingent fee basis.
Xxxxxxx and Associates. P. O. Box 8563 Woodland, CA 95776 Phone: ( 000) 000-0000 Fax: (000) 000-0000 xxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx December 29, 2014 To: Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx CaCCA Executive Committee From: Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Re: Report of Marketing Consultant/California Certified Crop Adviser FREP Educational Project for the Period of October - December 2014. Below is a list of California Certified Crop Advisers (CaCCA) accomplishments and programs regarding marketing and promotion completed or in progress during the fourth quarter. None of these tasks would be able to be completed without the involvement of CaCCA Board of Directors, CaCCA program administrator and members. These tasks are outlined in the Scope of Work/Budget memo to Xxx Xxxxxx dated January 5, 2012. This report completes that Scope of Work within the FREP Project. Thank you for the opportunity to be part of the FREP Project. • The current number of CaCCAs is 975. This is a dynamic number as information on new credentialed CCA candidates is received on a regular basis. • The following actions were taken to promote the February 6, 2015 CCA exam. o Prepared and distributed, with follow up, emails to over 100 individuals. o Prepared and distributed news release on February 7, 2014 exam. News release was distributed to Ag Alert, Western Farm Press, Capital Farm Press, Xxxxxxx Media, AgNetWest, California Ag Today, The Grower, local newspapers and other print/electronic media. o Promoted February 6, 2015 exam via social media including Twitter, Linkedln and Facebook. o Phone conversations and personal contacts regarding the exam. The number of participants taking the February 6, 2015 exam is as follows. o Visalia - 58 (International), 75 (State) o Ventura - 12 (International), 13 (State) o Yuma - 12 (International), 11 (State) x Xxxxxxx - 20 (International), 27 (State) o Sacramento - 60 (International), 66 (state) • The California CCA program this quarter exhibited at the following events:
Xxxxxxx and Associates. Engineering Consultant
Xxxxxxx and Associates. I understand I may be charged the full fee for services if a scheduled appointment is not kept or is canceled with less then a 48 hour notice. I certify that I understand the above information and have had the opportunity to ask questions for clarification as needed.
Xxxxxxx and Associates. XXXXXXX AND ASSOCIATES Issue 1 – Overstated Direct and Indirect Costs 1a - WSP should reimburse the Authority for $164,646 in over reimbursed overhead costs. WSP will reimburse the Authority $164,646. 09/30/22 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Please provide status. Per agreement between WSP and the Authority on September 28, 2022, WSP will submit payment within 14 days of the issuance of the Final Contract Compliance Audit Report, which is expected on October 7, 2022. XXXXXXX AND ASSOCIATES 1b - The Subconsultant should ensure future indirect cost rates are adequately supported and comply with agreement and federal requirements. Subcontractor is no longer on the Project. WSP trained Xxxxxxx staff on the importance of having adequate documentation to support indirect costs. Due to changes in personnel, Xxxxxxx'x new staff needed additional training, which was also completed. 01/20/21 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Please provide documentation. Please refer to Exhibit F and F1 through F3: Consultant ICR Policy, Process and Procedures, Certification and Assessment Forms. CORDOBA CORPORATION CORDOBA CORPORATION Issue 1 – Over- Reimbursed Direct Labor Costs 1a -The Subconsultant should ensure billed labor costs are incurred and paid prior to seeking reimbursement. Please see Cordoba response to audit findings. (Exhibit 1) Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Where is Exhibit 1? Please provide documentation. Please refer to Exhibit K for Xxxxxxx’s response to audit. This letter will be revised after the Final Audit report has been issued and Cordoba has official notification of the SUB CONSULTANT AUTHORITY ISSUE RECOMMENDATION CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLETION DATE PERSON ACCOUNTABLE Authority Comments to WSP WSP RESPONSE exact amount owed. Cordoba paid its employees the actual amounts billed, but the payments were made outside of the audit period. The HSR Audit Team took this into account. WSP is now waiting for official notification of the new amount owed. CORDOBA CORPORATION 1b - WSP should verify all billing rates to the approved amounts on the agreement compensation schedule or the rates listed in the Master Resource Pool. WSP has also made a significant effort to vet subconsultant rates by implementing the following: • The Master Resource Pool (MRP). The MRP is a SharePoint database specifically designed to maintain current and historical rates for individuals working for the RDP on the Project. • Labor payroll verification is done by the WSP MRP Administrator when subconsultants submit payroll registers. In additio...
