Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xx known to me who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he/she is the Vice President of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., a New York corporation, one of the parties that executed the foregoing instrument; and that he/she signed his/her name thereto by order of the Board of Directors. ----------------------- Notary Public [Notarial Seal]
Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xx. Xxxxx and Xx. Xxxxxxx are licensed to practice social work in Ontario. Unless they are licensed in that jurisdiction, it is illegal for a social worker or psychologist to practice in a location you may be in at the time the service is delivered, even if you are a resident of Ontario, unless the therapist obtains permission from that state or province or the required form of licensure in advance of the delivery of service. In many cases, it is possible for permission or a temporary license to be obtained. By signing this agreement you agree to advise the therapist for each telephone or video contact if you are no longer in Ontario.
Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xx. In his personal capacity and as sole equity owner of Millennium Financial Group, Inc.
Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xx. Xxxxx, and the University of Florida will undertake certain molecular, cellular and isolated tissue pharmacology studies on [ ] in collaboration with CVT. CVT will provide the material for these studies and the University of Florida Scientists will investigate [ ].
Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xx. Xxxx and the Dead Sea Scrolls (New York: Crossroad, 1991).
Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xx. XX-00000, Xxxxxxx 1.1.4. Telephone: (+370 5) 268 7001 1.1.5. E-mail: xxxxx@xx.xx.xx 1.
Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xx. Four factor index of social status. 1975 Author Manuscript Xxxxxxxxx et al. Page 18 Isolan L, Salum GA, Xxxxxxx AT, Xxxxx E, Xxxxxx XX. Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) in Brazilian children and adolescents. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2011; 25(5):741–748. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.03.015 [PubMed: 21514788] Xxxxxxx J, Xxxxxxxx B, Xxxxx X, Xxx X, Xxxxx C, Xxxxxx P, Xxxxxxxxxx D, Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxx for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children – Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data [Article]. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1997; 36:980–988. [PubMed: 9204677] Xxxxxx XX, Xxxxxx A, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx G, Xxxxx XX. Neural reactivity to monetary rewards and losses differentiates social from generalized anxiety in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2015; 56(7):792–800. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12355 [PubMed: 25363803] Xxxxx XX. Parent-child agreement in clinical-assessment of anxiety and other psychopathology-a review. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 1991; 5(2):187–198. DOI: 10.1016/0887-6185(91)90028-r Author Manuscript Xxxxxxx K, Xxxxxxx XX, Xxxxxxxx JBW, Xxxxxxx PO, Xxxx B. Anxiety disorders in primary care: Prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007; 146(5): 317–325. [PubMed: 17339617] Xxxxxxxxx XX, Xxxx RE, Xxxxxxxx X, Xxxxxxx DA, Xxxx XX. Increased error-related negativity (ERN) in childhood anxiety disorders: ERP and source localization. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2006; 47(10):1073–1082. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01654.x [PubMed: 17073986]
Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xx et al. On May 13, 1998, a toxic tort complaint, Austin, et al. v. X. X. Xxxxxxxxxxxx, Xx. et al., Case No. 312339 was filed in Superior Court of Riverside County. The plaintiffs are all neighbors of the Xxxxxxxxxxxx superfund site and seek compensation for damages for alleged personal injuries and property damages related to exposure to groundwater contamination allegedly emanating from the site. Aerojet is one of hundreds of defendants served which were allegedly generators of waste to the site. Aerojet has joined a common defense group comprised of 30 de minimis generators. Aerojet has notified its insurers and will vigorously defend this action. In re: Proposition 65 Notices Aerojet was served in November and December 1997 with notices from a private group alleging that it had released chemicals into air and groundwater near its Sacramento facility above state limits in violation of California's Proposition 65 and/or without filing sufficiently detailed public notifications as required by Proposition 65. Following collection and review of all of its Proposition 65 records, air release reports and groundwater reports, Aerojet believes it is in compliance with Proposition 65 and has so advised the California Attorney General's office. On June 4, 1998, Aerojet was served with a Proposition 65 lawsuit filed by the Communities For A Better Environment (CBE) in Sacramento Superior Court. The complaint alleges past and present violations of Proposition 65. Aerojet's insurance carriers have been notified of these claims. Aerojet plans a vigorous defense. On July 6, 1998, the case was removed to U.S. District Court based on that court's jurisdiction over the CERCLA Partial Consent Decree for the Sacramento site. Plaintiffs then moved to remand the case to the Sacramento Superior Court. The remand motion was denied by U.S. District Court in November 1998. The federal court in early 1999 transferred the case to Sacramento Superior Court due to its finding of lack of jurisdiction and discovery in the case began. Aerojet and CBE reached a settlement agreement in principal in late December 1999, which if ultimately agreed to and approved by the State and court, will lead to dismissal of the action with prejudice. American States Water Company, et al. v. Aerojet, et al. On October 25, 1999, plaintiffs sued Aerojet in Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 99AS05949, alleging, among other things, that historical releases of chemicals at the Aerojet Sacramento plant damage...
Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xx. Title: Chairman of the Board ---------------------------
