Copyleft definition
Copyleft means a licensing model that permits anyone to use, modify or redistribute software, subject to a condition of use, modification, and/or distribution of such software, whereby such software and/or any other software incorporated into such software, derived from or distributed with such software be (i) disclosed or distributed in source code form to the public, (ii) licensed to the public for the purpose of making derivative works or (iii) re-distributed to anyone at no charge.
Copyleft means a form of licensing that grants to any person the rights to freely use, modify, copy and distribute copies and/or modified versions of a particular program (open source software), provided that the same rights are preserved in any derivative works of such program. GNU General Public License is an example of copyleft licensing.
Copyleft means materials subject to any license that requires as a condition of use, modification, or distribution thereof, that such materials, or materials combined or distributed with such materials, be (1) disclosed or distributed in source code or similar form, (2) licensed for the purpose of making derivative works, or (3) redistributable at no charge.
Examples of Copyleft in a sentence
Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has used any Open Source Materials in a manner that requires any material software or Intellectual Property owned by the Company or any of the Company’s Subsidiaries to be subject to Copyleft Licenses.
Even in the case of work licensed as public domain or Copyleft, (See: http://creativecommons.org/) the student must provide attribution of that work in order to uphold the standards of intent and authorship.
Except as would not reasonably be expected to, individually or in the aggregate, have a Company Material Adverse Effect, no Open Source Software is or has been included, incorporated or embedded in, linked to, combined or distributed with or used in the delivery or provision of any Company Software, in a manner that subjects any Company Software to any Copyleft License.
Universal Reciprocity and Copyleft In many ways, universal reciprocity resembles the “copyleft” requirement of OSS licenses such as the GPL.33 These requirements provide that, subject to a few exceptions, a licensee that incorporates OSS code into another software program must redistribute the entire combined program under the same OSS terms.34 The result is an OSS ecosystem in which no participant may turn the OSS code developed by others into proprietary software.
The Company has not used any Open Source Materials subject to a Copyleft License in an OSS Triggering Manner.
More Definitions of Copyleft
Copyleft. “freeware”, or “general public” license; (b) any license that is substantially similar to those listed at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/licenses/; and (c) any license that (i) requires (including as a condition to the license grants therein) the licensor to permit reverse-engineering of the licensed technology (such as software) or other technology incorporated into, derived from, or distributed with such licensed technology or (ii) requires (including as a condition to the license grants therein) that the licensed technology or other technology incorporated into, derived from, or distributed with such licensed technology (A) be distributed in source code form, (B) be licensed for the purpose of making modifications or derivative works, (C) be distributed at no charge, or (D) be distributed with certain notices or licenses (e.g., copyright notices or warranty disclaimers).
Copyleft refers to licenses that allow derivative works but require them to use the same license as the original work. For example, if a software is written and release under the GNU General Public License (a widely-used copyleft license), and then someone else modifies that software and distributes their modified version, the modified version must be licensed under the GNU GPL too — including any new code written specifically to go into the modified version. Both the original and the new work are open source; the copyleft license simply ensures that property is perpetuated to all downstream derivatives. Most copyleft licenses are open source, but not all open source licenses are copyleft. When an open source license is not copyleft, that means software released under that license can be used as part of programs distributed under other licenses, including proprietary (non-open-source) licenses. Copyleft provisions apply only to actual derivatives, that is, cases where an existing copylefted work was modified. Xxxxxx distributing a copyleft work alongside a non-copyleft work does not cause the latter to fall under the copyleft terms. In the end, it is necessary to understand if it is possible to write proprietary code that links to a shared library that is open source. Sometimes it is possible; it depends on the open source license. Authors often permit users to do this, so most shared libraries are licensed under a permissive license or one that allows linking under certain circumstances (e.g., the LGPL1). A 1 GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE available at xxxx://xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/licenses/LGPL-3.0. very small number of libraries use the GPL2, which only allows linking with proprietary works if the licensor grants an explicit exception. Thus, it is advisable to check the licenses that the program links to. The community expects that all code linked to GPL code will be licensed under the GPL, even if the link is made at runtime using a shared library. With particular regard to the open source software deployed by partners, these can be identified in the following licenses:
Copyleft. “freeware” or “general public” license (including the GNU General Public License (GPL), GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), the GNU Affero General Public License, Mozilla Public License (MPL), BSD licenses, the Artistic License (e.g., PERL), the Netscape Public License, the Sun Community Source License (SCSL), the Sun Industry Standards License (SISL), QT Free Edition License, IBM Public License, Bitkeeper and the Apache License); and (ii) any license that is substantially similar to those listed at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/licenses/ or that meets the Open Source Definition (as promulgated by the Open Source Initiative) or the Free Software Definition (as promulgated by the Free Software Foundation). “Orders” shall mean any order, writ, injunction, decision, judgment, ruling, plan or decree of any Governmental Entity. “Parent” shall have the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement. “Party” or “Parties” shall mean Parent, Vectron and/or Buyer, as the case may be. “Patents” shall mean issued U.S. and foreign patents and pending patent applications, patent disclosures, and any and all divisions, continuations, continuations-in-part, reissues, reexaminations, and extensions thereof, certificates of invention and similar statutory rights, including in each case all inventions and improvements described therein. “Periodic Taxes” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.1(a)(ii). “Permitted Liens” shall mean (a) Liens for Taxes not yet due and payable or being contested in good faith by appropriate Proceedings and for which appropriate reserves have been made, (b) Liens as reflected in title records relating to Acquired Real Property that do not materially impair the use or value of the Acquired Real Property to which they relate, (c) Liens arising from products purchased from third parties under a retention of title or similar reservation, (d) Liens of landlords or mechanic’s, material men’s, repairman’s or similar Liens arising in the ordinary course of business with respect to obligations that are not more than one
Copyleft means Open Source license terms that require that the same conditions set forth in such license be included in any derivative works of such Open Source. "Share-Alike Database" means Open Source license conditions that require that the same conditions set forth in such license be included in adapted versions of this database.
Copyleft or similar license or terms of use for Software that (a) has been approved by the Open Source Initiative for open source software (as listed at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/licenses) in effect as of the date of this Agreement, including the GNU General Public License, GNU Lesser General Public License, Mozilla License, Common Public License, Apache License, BSD License, Artistic License, or Sun Community Source License or (b) provides as a condition or covenant of use, modification or distribution of the licensed, distributed, or conveyed Software, that such Software, Exhibit B - Page 126 of 134 xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/Archives/xxxxx/data/1002638/000100263816000084/exhibit21.htm 127/134 or other Software derived from, or linked to, such Software or into or with which such Software is incorporated or distributed (i) be disclosed in source code form to Third Parties, (ii) be licensed to Third Parties for the purpose of making derivate works or (iii) be redistributable to Third Parties at no charge.
Copyleft as used in these conditions means that software which is subject to certain OSS Licensing Conditions may be passed on only under the same or compatible OSS Licensing Conditions as the case may be.
Copyleft means that modifications of the licensed work must also be distributed under the same license terms. Copyleft licenses are different from the more permissive open-source licenses that allow derivative works to be sublicensed, or released under a different license, including in some cases proprietary ones. The warranty feature grants distributors the right to place some type of warranty, or a time limit, on either the software or services related to the software. A patent clause is either a patent grant or a patent retaliation clause. A patent grant requires that distributors give rights to use contributor's patents for all functionality of the software so that, when someone contributes to a software package, he or she cannot later sue others for using the software. A retaliation clause essentially seeks to protect the holder from any patent aggression. A trademark clause states that distributors do not have the right to use the licensor’s name or symbol that represents the author or the product. Finally, a no-promotion feature means that distributors cannot use the name of the software or the author(s) for promotion purposes.