Adequacy of Insurance Coverage. Neither Company nor Project Owner warrant the adequacy of the types of insurance or the limits required. The insurance requirements, including the limits required for Additional Insured coverage, do not limit Your legal responsibilities and liabilities. If the insurance requirements specified by Project Owner in the Prime Contract are greater than what is required in this Exhibit A, You are bound by those greater requirements and shall immediately obtain the required coverage and limits. Company has no duty to You or to any of Your insurers or their insurance agents to review any Certificates of Insurance or copies of other insurance documents furnished to Company to determine whether Your insurance complies with the insurance requirements of the Contract/Agreement. Failure of Company to detect that You have not submitted Certificates of Insurance or proper Certificates of Insurance, or are otherwise not in compliance with the insurance-related provisions of the Contract/Agreement shall not be considered a waiver or other impairment of any of Company's rights, and shall not in any way limit or relieve You of Your obligations to maintain the insurance required in the Contract/Agreement. You bear the sole responsibility for ensuring Your insurance meets the requirements of the Contract/Agreement.
Adequacy of Insurance Coverage. (a) The adequacy of the insurance coverage required by this Article IX may be reviewed periodically by the City. The City may request a change in the insurance coverage if it is commercially reasonable, customary and commonly available regarding properties similar in type, size, use and location to the Leased Property and Lessee Improvements provided that such coverage is available at commercially reasonable rates (including without limitation, fiduciary liability and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance);
(b) SAMP has the right to contest the request for a change in insurance, but must be commercially reasonable; and
(c) XXXX agrees that City may, if it so elects, have the Lessee Improvements appraised, at the City's sole cost and expense, for purposes of obtaining the proper amount of insurance hereunder. Any review by the City shall not constitute an approval or acceptance of the amount of insurance coverage.
Adequacy of Insurance Coverage. All property of Tenant kept or stored on the Demised Premises shall be so kept or stored at the sole risk of Tenant. Tenant expressly acknowledges and agrees that it is solely responsible for insuring its personal property, improvements, betterments, and the other contents of the Demised Premises at its sole cost and expense. Landlord makes no representation or warranty that the limits of insurance coverage required to be carried by Tenant pursuant to this Lease are adequate to protect Tenant. If Tenant believes that additional insurance coverage is required, Tenant shall be solely responsible for obtaining such coverage as it deems necessary or sufficient.
Adequacy of Insurance Coverage. City May Procure Insurance if SAMP Fails To Do So. ...............................
Adequacy of Insurance Coverage. (a) The adequacy of the insurance coverage required by this Article IX may be reviewed periodically by the City in its sole discretion. The City may request a change in the insurance coverage if it is commercially reasonable, customary and commonly available regarding properties similar in type, size, use and location to the Leased Property and Developer Improvements provided that such coverage is available at commercially reasonable rates (including without limitation, environmental liability insurance, fiduciary liability and directors and officers liability insurance);
(b) Developer has the right to contest the request for a change in insurance, but must be commercially reasonable;
(c) Developer agrees that City may, if it so elects, have the Developer Improvements appraised for purposes of obtaining the proper amount of insurance hereunder. Any review by the City shall not constitute an approval or acceptance of the amount of insurance coverage; and
(d) In the event that insurance proceeds are not adequate to rebuild and restore the damaged Developer Improvements to their previous condition before an insurable loss occurred, and the cause of the deficiency in insurance proceeds is the Developer’s failure to adequately insure Developer Improvements as required by this Lease, Developer shall rebuild and restore such Developer Improvements pursuant to the terms hereof and shall pay any such deficiency notwithstanding the fact that such insurance proceeds are not adequate.
Adequacy of Insurance Coverage. COUNTY makes no representation that the limits of liability specified in this Paragraph 7 are adequate to protect TENANT’s interests. In the event TENANT believes that such insurance coverage is insufficient, TENANT shall provide, at TENANT’s sole cost and expense, such additional insurance as TENANT deems adequate. In no event shall the limits of any coverage maintained by TENANT pursuant to this Lease limit TENANT’s liability under this Lease.
Adequacy of Insurance Coverage. 1. The adequacy of the insurance coverage required by this section 16. may be reviewed periodically by the TPA in its reasonable discretion. The TPA may request a change in the insurance coverage, if it is commercially reasonable; provided, that such coverage is available at commercially reasonable rates.
2. The CONSULTANT has the right to contest the request for a change in insurance but must be commercially reasonable.
Adequacy of Insurance Coverage. The CRA has the unilateral right to periodically review the adequacy of the insurance coverage required by this Agreement. The CRA may request a change in the insurance coverage if the requested change is commercially reasonable, and the coverage requested is customary and commonly available for properties similar in type, size, use and location to the CRA Property and improvements (including without limitation, environmental liability insurance, fiduciary liability, and directors and officers liability insurance). Developer has the right to contest the request for a change in insurance, but such contest must be commercially reasonable.
Adequacy of Insurance Coverage. The City has the unilateral right to periodically review the adequacy of the insurance coverage required by this Agreement. The City may request a change in the insurance coverage if the requested change is commercially reasonable, and the coverage requested is customary and commonly available for properties similar in type, size, use and location to the Property and Improvements (including without limitation, environmental liability insurance, fiduciary liability, and directors and officers liability insurance). Operator has the right to contest the request for a change in insurance, but must be commercially reasonable. Inadequacy of Insurance Proceeds. In the event that insurance proceeds are not adequate to rebuild and restore damaged Improvements to their previous condition before an insurable loss occurs, and the cause of the deficiency in insurance proceeds is the Operator’s failure to adequately insure the Improvements as required by this Agreement, Operator must rebuild and restore the Improvements as required by this Agreement and will be responsible for payment of any costs of the rebuilding and restoration not covered by the insurance proceeds.
Adequacy of Insurance Coverage. The City has the unilateral right to periodically review the adequacy of the insurance coverage required by this Agreement. The City may require a change in the insurance coverage if the coverage requested is customary and commonly available for properties similar in type, size, use and location to the Premises
