Analysis Considerations Sample Clauses

Analysis Considerations. Under the ESA Sec. 3(19) “take” is defined as “to harass, harm, pursue, xxxx, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct”. The Interior Secretary further defined “harm” as that “which actually injures or kills wildlife, including acts which annoy it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt essential behavioral patterns, which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or sheltering; significant environmental modification or degradation which has such effects.” (50 CFR 17.3). If the Service lists the monarch under the ESA, a variety of management and development actions will have the potential to result in take of the species. For example, direct mortality of monarchs from covered activities may occur from mowing vegetation that contains monarch eggs, larvae, or pupae, or collisions with vehicles. Off-road access, vegetation management, and construction activities may harm monarchs if they result in major disturbance to breeding and foraging. Similarly, management activities for monarch conservation purposes, such as common vegetation management practices, prescribed burning, and seeding of native seed mixes, all have the potential to result in take depending on whether or not suitable monarch habitat exists at the management site, the timing of the management actions, and other factors. This section is intended to summarize potential impacts or take of monarchs that is reasonably certain to occur as a result of the covered activities. There are several challenges related to estimating the amount of take of monarchs that covered activities will cause. First, the Agreement covers all of the monarch’s breeding, migratory, and overwintering range across the lower 48 United States. Second, the species’ presence on covered lands and their exposure to covered activities will be influenced by the time of year, variations in weather patterns among years, and on the extent and quality of habitat affected. Likely impacts on monarchs will also depend on the location and timing of the covered activities. Last, participation in the Agreement may vary over its duration, causing overall impacts to fluctuate over time. The extent of take that will occur will likely depend partly on the number of acres that Partners enroll under the Agreement and we do not know what that number will be at this time. Preliminary indications are that Partners may enroll up to 26 million acres, but the amount may be greater. Covered...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Analysis Considerations

  • Financial Considerations 5.1 In the event aggregate funding provided to SCDDO from county, state and/or federal sources is reduced or in any way becomes insufficient to fund this Agreement, the obligations of both SCDDO and the CSP must thereupon be: (1) reduced on a pro rata basis, or (2) renegotiated or terminated, provided that any termination of this Agreement must be without prejudice to any obligations or liabilities of the parties accrued prior to the termination.

  • General Considerations a. All reports, drawings, designs, specifications, notebooks, computations, details, and calculation documents prepared by Vendor and presented to the Board pursuant to this Agreement are and remain the property of the Board as instruments of service.

  • Ethical Considerations The study will be conducted in accordance with ethical principles founded in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) will review all appropriate study documentation in order to safeguard the rights, safety and well-being of the subjects. The study can only be conducted at study sites where IRB/IEC approval has been obtained. The protocol, informed consent form, Investigator’s Brochure, advertisements (if applicable), and all other forms of information given to subjects will be provided to the IRB/IEC by the Investigator. In addition, reports on the progress of the study will be submitted to the IRB/IEC by the Investigator at the appropriate intervals.

  • Special Considerations Special considerations in determining allowability of compensation will be given to any change in a non-Federal entity's compensation policy resulting in a substantial increase in its employees' level of compensation (particularly when the change was concurrent with an increase in the ratio of Federal awards to other activities) or any change in the treatment of allowability of specific types of compensation due to changes in Federal policy.

  • FINANCIAL CONSIDERATION A. The College/University and the Facility shall each bear their own costs associated with this Agreement and no payment is required by either the College/University or the Facility to the other party, except that, where applicable, the Facility shall pay the tuition and other educational fees of students it places in the clinical experience program.

  • RISK CONSIDERATION There are no significant risks associated with the recommendations contained within this report. This application may be considered under existing MPS policies. Community Council has the discretion to make decisions that are consistent with the MPS, and such decisions may be appealed to the N.S. Utility and Review Board. Information concerning risks and other implications of adopting the proposed development agreement are contained within the Discussion section of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS No environmental implications are identified.

  • Tax Considerations The Company has advised Recipient to seek Recipient’s own tax and financial advice with regard to the federal and state tax considerations resulting from Recipient’s receipt of the Award and Recipient’s receipt of the Shares upon Settlement of the vested portion of the Award. Recipient understands that the Company, to the extent required by law, will report to appropriate taxing authorities the payment to Recipient of compensation income upon the Settlement of RSUs under the Award and Recipient shall be solely responsible for the payment of all federal and state taxes resulting from such Settlement.

  • Additional Considerations For each mediation or arbitration:

  • Other Considerations A. Changes to an Approved Scope of Work: The Recipient shall notify FEMA and shall require a sub-recipient to notify it immediately when a sub-recipient proposes changes to an approved scope of work for an Undertaking.

  • Environmental Considerations A. Company, its officers, agents, servants, employees, invitees, independent contractors, successors, and assigns will not discharge or spill any Hazardous Substance, as defined herein, into any component of the storm drainage system or onto any paved or unpaved area within the boundaries of the Premises. In addition, Company will not discharge or spill any Hazardous Substance into any component of the sanitary sewer system without first neutralizing or treating same as required by applicable anti-pollution laws or ordinances, in a manner satisfactory to Authority and other public bodies, federal, state, or local, having jurisdiction over or responsibility for the prevention of pollution of canals, streams, rivers, and other bodies of water. Company’s discharge, spill or introduction of any Hazardous Substance onto the Premises or into any component of Authority’s sanitary or storm drainage systems will, if not remedied by Company with all due dispatch, at the sole discretion of Authority, be deemed a default and cause for termination of this Agreement by Authority, subject to notice and cure. Such termination will not relieve Company of or from liability for such discharge or spill.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.