APPEAL OF RATING CONTENT AND PROCEDURE Sample Clauses

APPEAL OF RATING CONTENT AND PROCEDURE. It is agreed that a rating 29 consists of both the letter rating (S, N, U) and the evaluator’s comments, if any. An employee 30 may, within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the rating, request a conference with the reviewer 31 of the rating to discuss the content of the rating. The reviewer of the rating will have ten (10) 32 days to determine if the rating content is accurate or inaccurate after the conference. If the 33 reviewer does not respond in the prescribed time period the grievant may appeal to the next 34 level. 36 Upon receipt of a written appeal it will be the responsibility of the recipient to forward a 37 copy to Employee Relations Services. 38 39 If still dissatisfied with the rating content, the employee may, within fifteen (15) days from 40 receiving the reviewer’s response, file with the next higher supervisor a written appeal of the 41 rating. The employee may request a conference. The next higher supervisor will have ten 42 (10) days from receipt of a written appeal to determine if the rating content is accurate or 43 inaccurate. If the next higher supervisor determines that the rating content is inaccurate, 44 he/she shall order that within ten (10) days a new rating be written. If the reviewer does not 45 respond in the prescribed time period, the grievant may appeal to the next level. The 46 employee shall be given a copy of a new rating which shall be placed in the employee's 47 personnel file. If the appeal is denied and the employee fails to proceed to the next level 1 within the timelines outlined herein, the original rating, together with the written appeal, shall 2 be placed in the employee's personnel file. 3 4 If the above appeal is denied and the employee is still dissatisfied with the rating content, the 5 employee within fifteen (15) days from the conference with the reviewer may file with the 6 appropriate Assistant/Deputy Superintendent or Chief Business and Financial Officer a 7 written appeal of the rating. The employee may request a conference. The Assistant/ Deputy 8 Superintendent or Chief Business and Financial Officer will have ten (10) days from the 9 receipt of a written appeal to determine if the rating content is accurate or inaccurate. If the 10 Assistant/Deputy Superintendent or Chief Business and Financial Officer determines the 11 rating content is inaccurate, he/she shall direct the immediate supervisor/manager to rewrite 12 the rating. The immediate supervisor/manager shall give a copy of the revised rati...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
APPEAL OF RATING CONTENT AND PROCEDURE. It is agreed that a rating 22 consists of both the letter rating (S, N, U) and the evaluator’s comments, if any. An employee 23 may, within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the rating, request a conference with the reviewer 24 of the rating to discuss the content of the rating. The reviewer of the rating will have ten (10) 25 days to determine if the rating content is accurate or inaccurate after the conference. If the 26 reviewer does not respond in the prescribed time period, the grievant may appeal to the next 27 level. 29 Upon receipt of a written appeal, it will be the responsibility of the recipient to 30 forward a copy to Employee Relations Services. 31 32 If still dissatisfied with the rating content, the employee may, within fifteen (15) days from 33 receiving the reviewer’s response, file with the next higher supervisor a written appeal of the
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3

Related to APPEAL OF RATING CONTENT AND PROCEDURE

  • Audit of Existing Content and Functionality By May 1, 2017, the District will propose for OCR’s review and approval the identity and bona fides of an Auditor (corporation or individual) to audit all content and functionality on its website, including, but not limited to, the home page, all subordinate pages, and intranet pages and sites, to identify any online content or functionality that is inaccessible to persons with disabilities, including online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third party vendor or an open source. The Auditor will have sufficient knowledge and experience in website accessibility for people with disabilities to carry out all related tasks, including developing a Proposed Corrective Action Plan. The Audit will use the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set out above, unless the District receives prior permission from OCR to use a different standard as a benchmark. During the Audit, the District will also seek input from members of the public with disabilities, including parents, students, employees, and others associated with the District, and other persons knowledgeable about website accessibility, regarding the accessibility of its online content and functionality.

  • Complaints Procedure 18.1 If the Client has any cause for complaint in relation to the services provided by the Company, he should file a complaint as per the Company’s Complaint Handling policy which is available on the Company’s website.

  • Nonpayment and Procedures for Disconnection 12.1 If a Party is furnished Interconnection Services under the terms of this Agreement in more than one (1) state, Section 12.2 below through Section 12.19 below, inclusive, shall be applied separately for each such state.

  • Complaints by Bidders and Handling of Complaints (ix) The Recipient shall implement an effective and independent protest mechanism allowing bidders to protest and to have their protests handled in a timely manner. Fraud and Corruption

  • MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCEDURE 1. Where a person considers that the actions of one or both of the Contracting States result or will result for him in taxation not in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, he may, irrespective of the remedies provided by the domestic law of those States, present his case to the competent authority of the Contracting State of which he is a resident or, if his case comes under paragraph 1 of Article 24, to that of the Contracting State of which he is a national. The case must be presented within three years from the first notification of the action resulting in taxation not in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement.

  • Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement The PI agrees that information about themselves and the approved research use will be posted publicly on the dbGaP website. The information includes the PI’s name and Requester, project name, Research Use Statement, and a Non-Technical Summary of the Research Use Statement. In addition, and if applicable, this information may include the Cloud Computing Use Statement and name of the CSP or PCS. Citations of publications resulting from the use of controlled-access datasets obtained through this DAR may also be posted on the dbGaP website.

  • Complaint Procedure If an employee has a complaint, which is not a proper subject for a grievance under the grievance procedure, the employee may discuss it with their immediate supervisor. The employee may submit the complaint in writing. If necessary, the employee may also discuss the complaint with the Director of Staff Relations. The employee may have the assistance of their Alliance representative in presenting the complaint. Complaints shall be answered as soon as reasonably possible, but in no event shall an answer be delayed more than seven (7) business days, unless the time for an answer is extended by mutual agreement. If the employee and the Alliance are dissatisfied with the answer they may request a Special Conference.

  • GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE 8.01 The parties to this agreement believe it is important to adjust complaints and grievances as quickly as possible as provided for herein. The employee or Union shall first discuss any individual complaint informally with the Director of Care or designate at the first opportunity.

  • Hearing Procedure Prior to initiating the hearing procedure, the school official, the parent(s) or the guardian may request a conference to provide an opportunity for the parent(s)/guardian(s) and school official(s) to discuss the situation, present information, obtain an explanation of data submitted in the application and the decisions rendered. Such a conference shall not in any way prejudice nor diminish the right to a fair hearing. The designated hearing official shall ensure that the hearing procedure provides the following for both the household and the LEA:

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Interconnection Customer's data is materially different from what was originally provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies, then the Participating TO and the CAISO will conduct appropriate studies pursuant to the LGIP to determine the impact on the Participating TO’s Transmission System and affected portions of the CAISO Controlled Grid based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. The Interconnection Customer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed and all other requirements of this LGIA are satisfied.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.