Ascertained Merit Criteria Sample Clauses

Ascertained Merit Criteria. 100 points possible for 5% portion of total score Ascertained Merit points shall be awarded in the two categories listed below. Each category is valued as follows: Category 1 equals up to 30% (Thirty) percent; Category 2 equals up to 70% (Seventy) percent. Category 1: Special Team Participation = Current team members having completed all training requirements shall receive (6) six points per team association. Former team members having completed the required training associated with their tenure shall receive (3) three points for each prior team affiliation. Total possible points = (30) Thirty which will weigh as 30 percent of the whole. TRS Team Criteria HAZMAT Team Criteria Dive Team Criteria Investigation Team Criteria County Mechanics Team Wildland Team The above noted teams are the only teams for which points may be earned. Any “teams” added under different authorities or structures would need to be specifically negotiated into the labor contract.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Ascertained Merit Criteria. 15% portion of the total score. Ascertained Merit points will be awarded based upon the “Ascertained Merit Worksheet.”
Sample 1
Ascertained Merit Criteria. ‌ 100 points possible for 5% portion of total score Ascertained Merit points shall be awarded in the two categories listed below. Each category is valued as follows: Category 1 equals up to 30% (Thirty) percent; Category 2 equals up to 70% (Seventy) percent. Category 1: Special Team Participation = Current team members having completed all training requirements shall receive (6) six points per team association. Former team members having completed the required training associated with their tenure shall receive (3) three points for each prior team affiliation. Total possible points = (30) Thirty which xxxx xxxxx as 30 percent of the whole. TRS Team Criteria HAZMAT Team Criteria Dive Team Criteria Investigation Team Criteria County Mechanics Team Wildland Team The above noted teams are the only teams for which points may be earned. Any “teams” added under different authorities or structures would need to be specifically negotiated into the labor contract. Category 2: Highest Applicable Formal Education. Applicants will receive merit for the highest degree obtained at an accredited institution (up to 70 points maximum) which will weigh as 70 percent of the whole. Points are awarded for only one degree occurring at the highest level listed. As an example, a person has two Associate Degrees; they receive points for 1 of those degrees. Associates Degree: 11 points Bachelor Degree: 23 points Master’s Degree: 46 points Doctorate Degree: 70 points ARTICLE XXVI - SAVINGS CLAUSE‌ In the event any Article, section or portion of this Agreement should be held invalid and unenforceable by a Board, Agency or Court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall apply only to the specific Article, section or portion thereof specified in the Board, Agency or Court decision; and upon the issuance of such a decision, the Village and the union agree to immediately begin negotiations on a substitute for the invalidated Article, section or portion thereof.
Sample 1

Related to Ascertained Merit Criteria

  • Desirable Selection Criteria Post registration qualification in the area of specialty or evidence of significant progression towards one.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of: a. Teaching effectiveness, including effectiveness in presenting knowledge, information, and ideas by means or methods such as lecture, discussion, assignment and recitation, demonstration, laboratory exercise, practical experience, supervision of interns, theses, professional projects and/or dissertations, and direct consultation with students. The evaluation shall include consideration of effectiveness in imparting knowledge and skills, and effectiveness in stimulating students' critical thinking and/or creative abilities, the development or revision of curriculum and course structure, and adherence to accepted standards of professional behavior in meeting responsibilities to students. The evaluator may take into account class notes, syllabi, student exams and assignments, and any other materials relevant to the employee's teaching assignment. The teaching evaluation must take into account any relevant materials submitted by the employee, including the results of peer evaluations of teaching, and may not be based solely on student evaluations when this additional information has been made available to the evaluator. b. Contribution to the discovery of new knowledge, development of new educational techniques, and other forms of creative activity. Evidence of research and other creative activity shall include, but not be limited to, published books; articles and papers in professional journals; musical compositions, paintings, sculpture; works of performing art; papers presented at meetings of professional societies; funded grant activities; and research and creative accomplishments that have not yet resulted in publication, display, or performance. The evaluation shall include consideration of the employee's productivity, including the quality and quantity of the employee's research and other creative programs and contributions during the year, as well as recognition by the academic or professional community of what has been done. c. Public service that extends professional or discipline-related contributions to the community, the State, public schools, and/or the national and international community. This public service includes contributions to scholarly and professional organizations, governmental boards, agencies, and commissions that are beneficial to such groups and individuals. d. Participation in the governance processes of the University through significant service on committees, councils, and senates, beyond that associated with the expected responsibility to participate in the governance of the University through participation in regular departmental or college meetings. e. Other assigned University duties, such as attending University events, advising, counseling, and academic administration, or as described in a Position Description, if any, of the position held by the employee. Other assigned duties may include entrepreneurial activities that contribute to the further development of the University with an end result of creating a new venture. Evidence of entrepreneurial contributions shall include, but not be limited to, creation of self- supporting centers or institutes, development of multi- disciplinary research partnerships, and applications of research to implementations in society. To provide guidelines for the establishment, maintenance and use of employee evaluation files within the employee’s respective academic unit.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • General Criteria (a) If general criteria are required as part of the Application, only one (1) set shall be completed. General criteria measure the quality of the Land Manager’s overall OHV program. The Applicants shall answer these questions with respect to the entirety of the OHV operation, including all trails and areas available for OHV Recreation, not just specific Projects or Project Areas. (b) General criteria include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) OHV Opportunity and services provided, (2) Agency contribution to the overall cost of managing and delivering the OHV Opportunity, (3) Management of natural and Cultural Resources, (4) Effective education of rules/regulations, and (5) Past performance in completing and administering Xxxxx funded Projects. (c) Non-land manager Applicants required to complete the general criteria shall cooperate with the Land Manager(s) to obtain the information necessary to complete the general criteria section of the Application. Note: Authority cited: Sections 5001.5 and 5003, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sections 5024.1, 5090.32 and 5090.50, Public Resources Code.

  • Performance Adjustment One-twelfth of the annual Performance Adjustment Rate will be applied to the average of the net assets of the Portfolio (computed in the manner set forth in the Fund's Declaration of Trust or other organizational document) determined as of the close of business on each business day throughout the month and the performance period.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!