Authority Review - Approval Standard Sample Clauses

Authority Review - Approval Standard. All Major Phase Applications shall be reviewed and considered by the Authority Board, and shall be Approved by the Authority Board, in its reasonable discretion, if and to the extent the Major Phase Application (i) conforms to and is consistent with the applicable Development Requirements and, if applicable, the Land Acquisition Agreements, and (ii) as to matters or details that are beyond the scope of the foregoing, is reasonably acceptable to the Authority Board consistent with the requirements of Section 1.1.10 above and 4.2.6
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Authority Review - Approval Standard. All Sub-Phase Applications shall be reviewed and considered by the Executive Director, and shall be Approved if and to the extent the Sub-Phase Application (i) conforms to and is consistent with the Development Requirements, and (ii) as to matters or details that are beyond the scope of the foregoing, is reasonably acceptable to the Executive Director consistent with the requirements of Sections 1.1.10 and 5.2.6 below. Without limiting any Approvals required (or the standards for such Approvals) under the ICA or under Section 1.1.7 above, the Approval of the Authority Board shall be required for Sub-Phase Applications that include changes to the Development Requirements that (i) materially amend the Infrastructure Plan; (ii) materially extend the Outside Dates for Sub-Phase Applications for one or more Sub- Phases within the Major Phase; (iii) increase the number of Sub-Phases with the Major Phase; (iv) materially delay the Completion of or otherwise reduce the Associated Public Benefits applicable to one (1) or more Sub-Phases; (v) materially extend the time for delivery of Authority Housing Lots within the Major Phase; or (vi) materially amend the Phasing Plan. If a Sub-Phase Application is disapproved by the Executive Director, then the Executive Director shall send a notice to Developer stating the basis for the disapproval by the end of the thirty (30) day review period cited above. Following any disapproval of a Sub-Phase Application, Developer may within ninety (90) days following receipt by Developer of such notice (subject to such extensions as may be Approved by the Executive Director) make changes to and resubmit the Sub-Phase Application. Promptly following the Executive Director’s receipt of a revised Complete Sub-Phase Application, the Executive Director shall review and consider the Sub-Phase Application in accordance with the procedure set forth in this Section 5.2.4. The Schedule of Performance shall be automatically extended, if necessary, to allow for the foregoing procedure so long as Developer is making diligent good faith efforts to make changes to the Sub-Phase Application that are responsive to the matters that the Executive Director cited as the basis for disapproval of the Sub-Phase Application.
Sample 1
Authority Review - Approval Standard. All Schematic Design Documents Applications shall be reviewed and considered by the Authority Board, and shall be Approved by the Authority Board if and to the extent the Schematic Design Documents Application (i) conforms to and is consistent with the applicable Redevelopment Requirements and (ii) as to matters or details that are beyond the scope of the foregoing, is reasonably acceptable to the Authority Board consistent with the requirements of Sections 1.1.10. For Schematic Design Document Applications for Historic Resources, the Authority shall not Approve the Schematic Design Documents without first consulting with a qualified professional preservation architect, planner, architectural historian or other professional experienced in the application of Secretary’s Standards for Rehabilitation to adaptive reuse projects (the "Preservation Specialist") as to whether or not the Schematic Design Documents meet the standards of the Design for Development for historic rehabilitation. If a Schematic Design Documents Application is disapproved by the Authority Board, then the Authority Board of Directors shall, at the public hearing during which the Schematic Design Documents Application is being considered, state the basis for the disapproval, which basis shall be summarized in writing by the Executive Director after the hearing and delivered to Vertical Developer within ten (10) days of the hearing date. Following any disapproval of a Schematic Design Documents Application, Vertical Developer may make changes to and resubmit the Schematic Design Documents Application at any time. Promptly following the Executive Director’s receipt of a revised Complete Schematic Design Documents Application, the Executive Director shall submit such revised Complete Schematic Design Documents Application in accordance with the procedure set forth in this Section 7.2.
Sample 1
Authority Review - Approval Standard. All Design Development Applications shall be reviewed and considered by the Executive Director, and shall be Approved or Conditionally Approved, if and to the extent the Design Development Application (i) conforms to and is consistent with the applicable Redevelopment Requirements, and (ii) as to matters or details that are beyond the scope of the foregoing, is reasonably acceptable to the Executive Director consistent with the requirements of Section 1.1.10 above. For Design Development Applications for Vertical Improvements to Historic Resources, the Authority shall not Approve the Design Development Application without first consulting with a Preservation Specialist as to whether or not the Design Development Application meets the standards of the Design for Development for historic rehabilitation. If the applicant disagrees with the Conditional Approval and the Design Development Application is disapproved by the Executive Director, then the Executive Director shall send a notice to the applicant stating the basis for the disapproval by the end of the thirty (30) day review period cited above. The applicant shall have the opportunity to make changes to and resubmit the Design Development Application from time to time. Promptly following the Executive Director’s receipt of a revised Complete Design Development Application, the Executive Director shall review and consider such Application in accordance with the procedure set forth in this Section 7.3.
Sample 1

Related to Authority Review - Approval Standard

  • Review and Approval Documents specified above must be submitted for review and approval by CITY Purchasing and Contracts prior to the commencement of work by CONTRACTOR. Neither approval by CITY nor failure to disapprove the insurance furnished by CONTRACTOR shall relieve CONTRACTOR of CONTRACTOR’S full responsibility to provide the insurance required by this Contract. Compliance with the insurance requirements of this Contract shall not limit the liability of CONTRACTOR or its sub-contractors, employees or agents to CITY or others, and shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any other remedy available to CITY under this Contract or otherwise. CITY reserves the right to request and review a copy of any required insurance policy or endorsement to assure compliance with these requirements.

  • FAA APPROVAL This Agreement may be subject to approval of the FAA. If the FAA disapproves this Agreement, it will become null and void, and both Parties will bear their own expenses relative to this Agreement, up to the date of disapproval.

  • Regulatory Compliance a. Monitor compliance with the 1940 Act requirements, including:

  • Application Approval Our representative will notify you (or one of you, if there are co-applicants) of the Application approval, execute the Lease agreements for signature prior to occupancy, and, once complete, credit the application deposit of all applicants toward the required security deposit.

  • County Review and Approval of Insurance Requirements The County reserves the right to review and adjust the Required Insurance provisions, conditioned upon County’s determination of changes in risk exposures.

  • Commission Approval The Parties understand and agree that this Agreement will be filed with the Commission for approval by such Commission (or the FCC if the Commission fails to act) pursuant to Section 252 of the Act. Each Party specifically reserves its right to judicial review of this Agreement under Section 252(e)(6) of the Act, or any other available remedy at law or equity. If the Commission, the FCC or any court rejects any portion of this Agreement, the Parties agree to meet and negotiate in good faith to arrive at a mutually acceptable modification of the rejected portion and any provisions that would be materially affected by deletion of the rejected portion; provided that such rejected portion shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge that nothing in this Agreement shall limit a Party's ability, independent of such Party's agreement to support and participate in the approval of this Agreement, to assert public policy issues relating to the Act, including challenging the validity of any portion of the Act or an FCC or Commission rule, order, Guideline or other determination made pursuant to the Act, or the application by CBT for suspension or modification of portions of the Act or rules pursuant to Section 251(f)(2) of the Act. In the event CBT obtains a suspension or modification of any portion of the Act or rules thereunder pursuant to Section 252(f)(2) of the Act, the Parties shall negotiate as necessary to incorporate the applicable terms and conditions of such suspension or modification and the Parties agree to negotiate as necessary in order to clarify the application of such suspension or modification to the terms of into this Agreement.

  • Approval/Non-Approval We will notify you whether your Application has been approved or denied within 14 days after the date we receive a completed Application. Notification may be in person or by mail or telephone unless you have requested that notification be by mail. You must not assume approval until you receive actual notice of approval. The 14-day time period may be changed only by separate written agreement.

  • REGULATORY FILINGS AND CAISO TARIFF COMPLIANCE 3.1 Filing

  • Department Review If a mutually acceptable solution has not been reached during Step 1, and the employee intends to pursue the grievance formally, the employee shall submit the grievance in writing on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form to the Department Head with a copy to the Labor Relations Division not later than ten (10) working days after the supervisor’s written response. The Department Head shall consider the grievance and render a written decision within ten (10) working days of receipt of the formal grievance. The written decision shall include a clear and concise statement including the reason(s) for the decision. The Department Head may hold a meeting with the employee to achieve any of the following purposes: 1) to identify why the employee feels there is a grievance and facilitate communication and resolution; 2) to clearly identify issues and areas of agreement/disagreement; and 3) to have the parties present whatever available information/ documentation necessary to fully attempt to resolve the grievance. The employee may be accompanied by his/her shop xxxxxxx during the Department Review, provided that the xxxxxxx is in the same department as the employee, and has been identified by the employee on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form. If the department, in consultation with the Labor Relations Division, determines that the grievance is outside of the Department Head’s authority, or the grievance involves employees working in separate departments, then such grievance shall be submitted to Step 3.

  • ROAD WORK PHASE APPROVAL Purchaser shall obtain written approval from the Contract Administrator upon completion of each of the following phases of road work:  Drainage installation  Subgrade compaction  Rock compaction SUBSECTION RESTRICTIONS

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.