Awarding the contract. The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who has submitted the most economically advantageous tender. It is to be noted that in accordance with Art. 85 of the Law of 17 June 2016, there is no obligation for the contracting authority to award the procurement contract. The contracting authority may either decide not to award the procurement contract; either redo the procedure, if necessary through another award procedure. The contracting authority maintains the right to award only a certain lot or certain lots.
Awarding the contract. The lots of the procurement contract will be awarded to the tenderer who has submitted the most economically advantageous tender for the lot. The contracting authority limits the number of lots that may be awarded to a single tenderer to 1 lot per tenderer. Therefore, the contracting authority shall select the most favourable overall solution and award the 2 lots accordingly. Most favourable overall solution means awarding the 2 lots to tenderers whose total contract value is the most economically advantageous to the contracting Authority. Notice though that in accordance with Art. 85 of the Law of 17 June 2016, there is no obligation for the contracting authority to award the procurement contract. The contracting authority may either decide not to award the procurement contract; either redo the procedure, if necessary through another award procedure. The contracting authority maintains the right to award only a certain lot or certain lots.
Awarding the contract. The procurement contract will be awarded to the tenderer who has submitted the least expensive tender. It is to be noted that in accordance with Art. 85 of the Law of 17 June 2016, there is no obligation for the contracting authority to award the procurement contract. The contracting authority may either decide not to award the procurement contract; either redo the procedure, if necessary, through another award procedure.
Awarding the contract. The procurement contract shall be awarded to a maximum of three framework contractors in cascade. If the first ranked framework contractor is unable to provide the requested services under a given order form, the second best ranked framework contractor shall be requested to provide the services. If the second best ranked framework contractor is unable to provide the services, the third best ranked framework contractor shall be contacted. Notice though that in accordance with Art. 85 of the Law of 17 June 2016, there is no obligation for the contracting authority to award the procurement contract. The contracting authority may either decide not to award the procurement contract; either redo the procedure, if necessary through another award procedure. The contracting authority maintains the right to award only a certain lot or certain lots.
Awarding the contract. The SCWA reserves the right not to award a contract.
Awarding the contract. The contract shall be awarded to the proposer whose proposal is deemed by the department head or selection committee to best provide the services desired, taking into account the requirements, terms and conditions contained in the request for proposals and the criteria for evaluating proposals
Awarding the contract. The contract will be awarded to the tenderer who has submitted the most economically advantageous tender. It is to be noted that in accordance with Art. 85 of the Law of 17 June 2016, there is no obligation for the contracting authority to award the procurement contract. The contracting authority may either decide not to award the procurement contract; either redo the procedure, if necessary through another award procedure. The contracting authority maintains the right to award only a certain lot or certain lots. The contracting authority restricts the number of lots that can be awarded to a single tenderer to 1 lot per tenderer. Contracts will be awarded lot by lot, but the contracting authority must choose the most favourable overall solution (for each lot) on the basis of the criteria mentioned above. The method for choosing the most favourable overall solution is as follows. Firstly, for each lot, the difference between the most advantageous bid (ranked “1”) and the second most advantageous bid (ranked “2”) is calculated. Secondly, for the lot with the biggest difference, the bid ranked “1” is chosen. Thirdly, for the lot with the second biggest difference, the bid ranked “1” is chosen, unless that tenderer has already been awarded 1 lot, in which case the bid ranked “2” is chosen. Fourthly, for the lot with the third biggest difference, the bid ranked “1” is chosen, unless the tenderer has already been awarded 1 lot, in which case the bid ranked “2” is chosen; unless that tenderer has also already been awarded 1 lot, in which case the bid ranked “3” is chosen.
Awarding the contract. The evaluation process shall be based upon the criteria identified in Section 1 of this Request for Proposals. Waynesboro Public School shall engage in individual discussions with two or more bidders deemed fully qualified, responsible and suitable on the basis of initial responses and with emphasis on professional competence, to provide the required services. Repetitive informal interviews shall be permissible. The bidders shall be encouraged to elaborate on their qualifications and performance data or staff expertise pertinent to the proposed project, as well as alternative concepts. The Request for Proposal shall not, however, request that bidders furnish estimates of man-hours or cost for services. At the discussion stage, Waynesboro Public Schools may discuss nonbinding estimates of total project costs, including, but not limited to, life-cycle costing, and where appropriate, nonbinding estimates of price for services. Proprietary information from competing bidders shall not be disclosed to the public or to competitors. At the conclusion of discussion, outlined herein, on the basis of evaluation factors published in the Request for Proposal and all information developed in the selection process to this point, Waynesboro Public Schools shall select in the order of preference two or more bidders whose professional qualifications and proposed services are deemed most meritorious. Negotiations shall then be conducted, beginning with the bidder ranked first. If a contract satisfactory and advantageous to Waynesboro Public Schools can be negotiated at a price considered fair and reasonable, the award shall be made to that bidder. Otherwise, negotiations with the bidder ranked first shall be formally terminated and negotiations conducted with the bidder ranked second, and so on until such a contract can be negotiated at a fair and reasonable price. Should Waynesboro Public Schools determine in writing and in its sole discretion that only one bidder is fully qualified, or that one bidder is clearly more highly qualified and suitable than the others under consideration, a contract may be negotiated and awarded to that bidder.
Awarding the contract. The parties agree that Kincardine is authorized to award the contract to the low qualified bidder if the total tender price is not more than fifteen (15%) per cent of the Current Cost Estimate as described in Schedule D, failing which Kincardine shall not award the contract for the Works without the prior written consent of the parties.
