Benchmark Review Sample Clauses

Benchmark Review. Upon completion of the Benchmark Process, Customer and Administrator shall review the Benchmark Results during the thirty (30) day period following delivery to Customer and Administrator of the Benchmark Results, and shall in good faith discuss any appropriate adjustments to the Service Levels or Charges under this Agreement, and identify and resolve any disagreements or variances from the Benchmark Results. The Benchmarker shall disclose: (i) if the Benchmark Results show that the relevant Charges are less than three percent (3%) higher than the normalized charges paid by the average of the Comparators in the first quartile of the Comparators that were the subject of such Benchmarking Process of the relevant sample; (ii) if the results show that the relevant Charges are between three percent (3%) and twenty percent (20%) greater than the normalized charges paid by the average of the Comparators in the first quartile of Comparators; or (iii) if the results show that the relevant Charges are more than twenty percent (20%) greater than the normalized charges paid by the average of the Comparators in the first quartile of Comparators. Based on such results, Administrator may elect to offer a proposal for Customer’s consideration for adjustments to the scope of Services, Service Levels and the relevant Charges. Any adjustments shall be made on a prospective basis only, beginning thirty (30) days after the Benchmark Process is completed.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Benchmark Review. Review conducted by SCDHHS and its EQRO to determine a CICO’s readiness to proceed to the next transition phase of HCBS authority.
Benchmark Review. Upon completion of the Benchmark Process, Customer and Supplier shall review the Benchmark Results during the thirty (30) day period following delivery to Customer and Supplier of the Benchmark Results, and shall in good faith discuss any appropriate adjustments to the applicable Service Level Agreement or Charges under this Agreement, and identify and resolve any disagreements or variances from the Benchmark Results. If the Benchmark Results show that the relevant Charges are less than five percent (5%) higher than the normalized charges paid by the average of the Comparators that were the subject of such Benchmarking Process of the relevant sample, then there will be no change in the Charges. If the results show that the relevant Charges are more than five percent (5%) greater than the normalized charges paid by the average of the Comparators, then the Parties shall meet and negotiate in good faith a plan to reduce the Charges so as to eliminate any such unfavorable variance (i.e., such that the relevant Charges for the Services are not more than five percent (5%) higher than the normalized charges paid by the average of the Comparators), with any such agreed-upon adjustment to the Charges to be made on a prospective basis only beginning thirty (30) days after the Benchmark Process is completed. The plan shall not call for changes to the Services included within the factors for which the Benchmarker adjusted Supplier’s Charges downward in making its comparison (e.g., Service Levels that were lower than those of the Comparators). If the Parties fail to agree upon a plan to reduce the Charges, or if Supplier fails to implement the agreed plan, in addition to any other rights and remedies available to Customer, Customer will have the right to terminate the Agreement, in whole or of the benchmarked Statement of Work, upon payment of the applicable Termination Charges described in the applicable Statements(s) of Work.
Benchmark Review. The Supply Chain Business Operations (SCBO) will send out the request, receive the information back from the supplier and review the information and follow up with department representative within five (5) business days XxxxxxXxxxxXxxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx
Benchmark Review. 2.1. The Authority may, by written notice, require a Benchmark Review of the Services in accordance with the provisions of this Schedule 8. The first Benchmark Review may not take place until at least {18} months after the Commencement Date and each subsequent Benchmark Review must be at least {12} months after the previous one.

Related to Benchmark Review

  • Benchmarking 19.1 The Parties shall comply with the provisions of Framework Schedule 12 (Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking) in relation to the benchmarking of any or all of the Goods and/or Services.

  • Benchmark Replacement Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein or in any other Loan Document, if a Benchmark Transition Event and its related Benchmark Replacement Date have occurred prior any setting of the then-current Benchmark, then (x) if a Benchmark Replacement is determined in accordance with clause (a) of the definition of “Benchmark Replacement” for such Benchmark Replacement Date, such Benchmark Replacement will replace such Benchmark for all purposes hereunder and under any Loan Document in respect of such Benchmark setting and subsequent Benchmark settings without any amendment to, or further action or consent of any other party to, this Agreement or any other Loan Document and (y) if a Benchmark Replacement is determined in accordance with clause (b) of the definition of “Benchmark Replacement” for such Benchmark Replacement Date, such Benchmark Replacement will replace such Benchmark for all purposes hereunder and under any Loan Document in respect of any Benchmark setting at or after 5:00 p.m. (New York City time) on the fifth (5th) Business Day after the date notice of such Benchmark Replacement is provided to the Lenders without any amendment to, or further action or consent of any other party to, this Agreement or any other Loan Document so long as the Administrative Agent has not received, by such time, written notice of objection to such Benchmark Replacement from Lenders comprising the Required Lenders. If the Benchmark Replacement is Daily Simple SOFR, all interest payments will be payable on a quarterly basis.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Performance of Reviews The RIRs shall send a request for review to the Operator per email, where they shall specify the areas they request a review for. The Operator must comply with the request by providing the requested information within working days. The review may include an onsite inspection. In this case the RIRs and the Operator must agree on a specific date for the inspection to take place, which may not be later than sixty calendar days from the date of the request.

  • Performance and Salary Review Company will periodically review Executive’s performance on no less than an annual basis. Adjustments to salary or other compensation, if any, will be made by Company in its sole and absolute discretion.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!