CITY OF CHICAGO Sample Clauses

CITY OF CHICAGO. YEAR 3 Child-Parent Center Expansion Prospective Cohort Size: 782 October 6, 2014 PROJECT SUPPLEMENT CLOSING August 15, 2016 09/01/16 FUNDING GSSIF (44%) $1,051,802 Northern Trust (32%) $764,947 XX Xxxxxxxx Foundation (24%) $573,710 01/01/17 FUNDING GSSIF (44%) $999,552 Northern Trust (32%) $726,947 XX Xxxxxxxx Foundation (24%) $545,210 TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS GSSIF (44%) $2,051,355 Northern Trust (32%) $1,491,894 XX Xxxxxxxx Foundation (24%) $1,118,921 TOTAL Year 3 Sources $4,662,170 USES OF FUNDS Disbursement to CPS (09/01/16) $2,271,710 Disbursement to CPS (01/01/17) $5,810 * 782 slots $2,271,710 Audit fees $10,000 Project Coordinator: IFF Year 3 $108,750 TOTAL Year 3 Uses $4,662,170 EVALUATOR RESERVE At closing, there will be an unfunded Evaluator Reserve of $319,000
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CITY OF CHICAGO. YEAR 3 Child-Parent Center Expansion Prospective Cohort Size: 782 October 6, 2014 PROJECT SUPPLEMENT CLOSING August 15, 2016 09/01/16 FUNDING GSSIF (44%) $1,051,802 Northern Trust (32%) $764,947 XX Xxxxxxxx Foundation (24%) $573,710 01/01/17 FUNDING GSSIF (44%) $999,552 Northern Trust (32%) $726,947 XX Xxxxxxxx Foundation (24%) $545,210 TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS GSSIF (44%) $2,051,355 Northern Trust (32%) $1,491,894 XX Xxxxxxxx Foundation (24%) $1,118,921 TOTAL Year 3 Sources $4,662,170 USES OF FUNDS Disbursement to CPS (09/01/16) $2,271,710 Disbursement to CPS (01/01/17) $5,810 * 782 slots $2,271,710 Audit fees $10,000 Project Coordinator: IFF Year 3 $108,750 TOTAL Year 3 Uses $4,662,170 EVALUATOR RESERVE At closing, there will be an unfunded Evaluator Reserve of $319,000 established funding of which can be requested by IFF if philanthropic funding for the Evaluator Fees to be funded in the Third and Fourth Subsequent Project Years is not identified, and in such event (subject to the satisfaction of the applicable funding conditions) the Evaluator Reserve amount will be advanced Pro Rata by each GSSIF, Northern Trust and X.X. Xxxxxxxx Foundation in the above percentages. CITY ESCROW By August 15, 2016, the City will wire $1,305,256 to Bank to escrow the City Pay-For-Success Payments the City may pay for the Subsequent Project Year Cohort for Project Year 2016 – 2017. CITY OF CHICAGO – YEAR 4 Child-Parent Center Expansion Prospective Cohort Size: 680 October 6, 2014 PROJECT SUPPLEMENT CLOSING August 15, 2017 09/01/17 FUNDING GSSIF (44%) $1,007,050 Northern Trust (32%) $732,400 XX Xxxxxxxx Foundation (24%) $549,300 01/01/18 FUNDING GSSIF (44%) $897,600 Northern Trust (32%) $652,800 XX Xxxxxxxx Foundation (24%) $489,600 TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS GSSIF (44%) $1,904,650 Northern Trust (32%) $1,385,200 XX Xxxxxxxx Foundation (24%) $1,038,900 Total Year 4 Sources $4,328,750 USES OF FUNDS Disbursement to CPS (09/01/17) $2,040,000 Disbursement to CPS (01/01/18) $6,000 * 680 slots $2,040,000 Audit fees $140,000 Project Coordinator: IFF Year 4 $108,750 TOTAL Year 4 Uses $4,328,750 EVALUATOR RESERVE At closing, there will be an unfunded Evaluator Reserve of $319,000 established funding of which can be requested by IFF if philanthropic funding for the Evaluator Fees to be funded in the Third and Fourth Subsequent Project Years is not identified, and in such event (subject to the satisfaction of the applicable funding conditions) the Evaluator Reserve amount will be advanced...
Sample 1
CITY OF CHICAGO. By ------------------------------------ Chief Financial Officer [SEAL] ATTEST: ----------------------------- City Clerk TRUSTEE'S CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION Date of Authentication: ___________________, ________. AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CHICAGO, Trustee, certifies that this is one of the Bonds referred to in the Indenture. By ------------------------------------ Authorized Signatory
Sample 1
CITY OF CHICAGO. Base Case Impact and Mobility Assumptions Child-Parent Center Expansion October 6, 2014 Grade Base Case Kindergarten Readiness Attainment Base Case Third Grade Literacy At Grade Level Base Case Control Group % Special Education Usage Base Case % Decrease in Special Education Usage Cumulative Mobility K 50.0% 0.0% 10.6% 44.5% 7.0% 1 0.0% 0.0% 12.4% 45.3% 9.5% 2 0.0% 0.0% 15.8% 48.6% 12.0% 3 0.0% 50.0% 20.2% 48.6% 14.5% 4 0.0% 0.0% 21.7% 41.0% 17.0% 5 0.0% 0.0% 20.3% 31.8% 19.5% 6 0.0% 0.0% 25.4% 45.4% 22.0% 7 0.0% 0.0% 22.5% 39.9% 24.5% 8 0.0% 0.0% 22.5% 39.9% 27.0% 9 0.0% 0.0% 22.5% 39.9% 29.5% 10 0.0% 0.0% 22.5% 39.9% 32.0% 11 0.0% 0.0% 22.5% 39.9% 34.5% 12 0.0% 0.0% 22.5% 39.9% 37.0% City of Chicago – Pay-for-Success Payments Per Slot Child-Parent Center Expansion October 6, 2014 City of Chicago – BASE Case PFS Payments Project Year Cohort 1 374 Students Child-Parent Center Expansion October 6, 2014 School Year Beginning September: Grade Board Pay for Success Payment at Base Case Level for School Year: City Pay for Success Payment at Base Case Level for School Year: 2014 CPC $0 $0 2015 K $149,438 $504,339 2016 1 $174,842 $0 2017 2 $234,690 $0 2018 3 $294,078 $119,914 2019 4 $261,542 $0 2020 5 $185,979 $0 2021 6 $325,172 $0 2022 7 $246,983 $0 2023 8 $241,193 $0 2024 9 $235,262 $0 2025 10 $229,188 $0 2026 11 $222,970 $0 2027 12 $216,604 $0 City of Chicago – BASE Case PFS Payments Project Year Cohort 2 782 Students Child-Parent Center Expansion October 6, 2014 School Year Beginning September: Grade Board Pay for Success Payment at Base Case Level for School Year: City Pay for Success Payment at Base Case Level for School Year: City of Chicago – BASE Case PFS Payments Project Year Cohort 3 782 Students Child-Parent Center Expansion October 6, 2014 School Year Beginning September: Grade Board Pay for Success Payment at Base Case Level for School Year: City Pay for Success Payment at Base Case Level for School Year: City of Chicago – BASE Case PFS Payments Project Year Cohort 4 680 Students Child-Parent Center Expansion October 6, 2014 School Year Beginning September: Grade Board Pay for Success Payment at Base Case Level for School Year: City Pay for Success Payment at Base Case Level for School Year: City of Chicago – Projected Board Budgeted Pay-For-Success Funds Child-Parent Center Expansion October 6, 2014 City of Chicago –City Escrowed Pay-For-Success Funds Child-Parent Center Expansion October 6, 2014 2014 $624,253 2015 $1,305,256 2016 $1,305,256 2017 $...
Sample 1
CITY OF CHICAGO. Base Case Impact and Mobility Assumptions
Sample 1
CITY OF CHICAGO. Case Xx. 00 XX 00000; (b) the full name, address and telephone number of the Class Member electing exclusion; and (c) a statement that the Class Member elects to be excluded from the Lawsuits and elects not to participate in the settlement. Opt-out elections must be postmarked no later than fifty-six (56) days after the deadline for Notice to be sent pursuant to Paragraph 12 above.
Sample 1
CITY OF CHICAGO. Case Xx. 00 XX 00000;
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CITY OF CHICAGO. Solely for purposes of the City of Chicago's Personal Property Lease/Rental Transaction Tax, rental payments in the amount of $132,739,678.56 shall be apportioned to the lease of all Components located in the City of Chicago. Payment of such rent shall be deemed to commence on October 15, 2006 and termination on July 15, 2010.
Sample 1

Related to CITY OF CHICAGO

  • THE CITY OF LINCOLN, NEBRASKA ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF LINCOLN, NEBRASKA Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Mayor Approved by Executive Order No. dated

  • City CITY’s DIRECTOR, or his or her designee, shall be the CITY official responsible for the Program and shall render overall supervision of the progress and performance of this AGREEMENT by CITY. All services agreed to be performed by CITY shall be under the overall direction of the DIRECTOR.

  • District The public agency or the school district for which the Work is performed. The governing board of the District or its designees will act for the District in all matters pertaining to the Contract. The District may, at any time: 1.1.23.1 Direct Developer to communicate with or provide notice to the Construction Manager or the Architect on matters for which the Contract Documents indicate Developer will communicate with or provide notice to the District; and/or 1.1.23.2 Direct the Construction Manager or the Architect to communicate with or direct Developer on matters for which the Contract Documents indicate the District will communicate with or direct Developer.

  • Massachusetts Business Trust With respect to any Fund which is a party to this Agreement and which is organized as a Massachusetts business trust, the term “Fund” means and refers to the trustees from time to time serving under the applicable trust agreement of such trust, as the same may be amended from time to time (the ‘Declaration of Trust”). It is expressly agreed that the obligations of any such Fund hereunder shall not be binding upon any of the trustees, shareholders, nominees, officers, agents or employees of the Fund personally, but bind only the trust property of the Fund as set forth in the applicable Declaration of Trust. In the case of each Fund which is a Massachusetts business trust (in each case, a “Trust”), the execution and delivery of this Agreement on behalf of the Trust has been authorized by the trustees, and signed by an authorized officer, of the Trust, in each case acting in such capacity and not individually, and neither such authorization by the trustees nor such execution and delivery by such officer shall be deemed to have been made by any of them individually, but shall bind only the trust property of the Trust as provided in its Declaration of Trust.

  • Illinois The following counties in the State of Illinois: Cook, Lake, McHenry, Kane, DuPage, Will as well as any other counties in the State of Illinois in which the Employee regularly (a) makes contact with customers of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (b) conducts the business of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or (c) supervises the activities of other employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries as of the Date of Termination.

  • Missouri CANCELLATION section is amended as follows: A ten percent (10%) penalty per month shall be applied to refunds not paid or credited within forty-five (45) days of receipt of returned Service Agreement.

  • Georgia Coverage is effective upon the expiration of the shortest portion of the manufacturer’s warranty. In the “WHAT IS NOT COVERED” section of this Agreement, exclusion (E) is removed and replaced with: Any and all pre-existing conditions known by You that occur prior to the effective date of this Agreement and/or any sold “AS- IS” including but not limited to floor models, demonstration models, etc. CANCELLATION section is amended as follows: If You cancel after thirty (30) days of receipt of Your Agreement, You will receive a pro rata refund of the Agreement price. In the event of cancellation by US, notice of such cancellation will be in writing and given at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation. Cancellation will comply with Section 33-24-44 of the Code of Georgia. Claims paid and cancellation fees shall not be deducted from any refund owed as a result of cancellation. Any refund owed and not paid as required is subject to a penalty equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the refund owed and interest of eighteen percent (18%) per year until paid; however, such penalty shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the amount of the refund. We may not cancel this Agreement except for fraud, material misrepresentation, or non-payment by You. ARBITRATION section of this Agreement is removed.

  • Massachusetts CANCELLATION section is amended as follows: The provider shall mail a written notice to the Service Agreement Holder, including the effective date of the cancellation and the reason for the cancellation at the last known address of the Service Agreement Holder contained in the records of the provider at least five (5) days prior to cancellation by the provider unless the reason for cancellation is nonpayment of the provider fee, material misrepresentation or a substantial breach of duties by the Service Agreement Holder relating to the Covered Product or its use. A ten percent (10%) penalty per month shall be applied to refunds not paid or credited within thirty (30) days of receipt of returned Service Agreement.

  • Michigan If performance under this Agreement is interrupted because of a strike or work stoppage at Our place of business, the effective period of the Agreement shall be extended for the period of the strike or work stoppage.

  • County The term COUNTY refers to the Board of County Commissioners of Lee County, a charter County and political subdivision of the State of Florida, and any official or employee duly authorized to act on the COUNTY'S behalf relative to this Agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!