Comity. 1. The Parties agree that, whenever the Commission or the South African Competition Authority has reason to believe that anti-competitive practices, defined under Article 35, are taking place within the territory of the other authority and are substantially affecting important interests of the Parties, it may request the other Party's competition authority to take appropriate remedial action in terms of that authority's rules governing competition.
2. Such a request shall not prejudice any action under the requesting authority's competition laws that may be deemed necessary and shall not in any way encumber the addressed authority's decision-making powers or its independence.
3. Without prejudice to its respective functions, rights, obligations or independence, the competition authority so addressed shall consider and give careful attention to the views expressed and documentation provided by the requesting authority and, in particular, pay heed to the nature of the anti-competitive activities in question, the firm or firms involved, and the alleged harmful effect on the important interests of the aggrieved Party.
4. When the Commission or the Competition Authority of South Africa decides to conduct an investigation or intends to take any action that may have important implications for the interests of the other Party, the Parties must consult, at the request of either Party and both shall endeavour to find a mutually acceptable solution in the light of their respective important interests, giving due regard to each other's laws, sovereignty, the independence of the respective competition authorities and to considerations of comity.
Comity. State agencies should design and incorporate best management practices for surface water quality and stormwater quantity management for new impervious surfaces. The runoff management techniques should be the same as flood abatement plans and techniques utilized by local governments in the watershed. The lead agency preparing an environmental assessment for a federal or state project shall identify the mitigating runoff management techniques to prevent increases in peak flood flows from new impervious areas. (Ord. dated 3/24/05 (part))
Comity. 1. The Parties agree that, whenever the Commission or the South African Competition Authority has reason to believe that anti-competitive practices, defined under Article 35, are taking place within the territory of the other authority and are substantially af- fecting important interests of the Parties, it may request the other Party’s competition authority to take appropriate remedial action in terms of that authority’s rules governing competition.
2. Such a request shall not prejudice any action under the requesting authority’s compe- tition laws that may be deemed necessary and shall not in any way encumber the ad- dressed authority’s decision-making powers or its independence.
3. Without prejudice to its respective functions, rights, obligations or independence, the competition authority so addressed shall consider and give careful attention to the views expressed and documentation provided by the requesting authority and, in particular, pay heed to the nature of the anti-competitive activities in question, the firm or firms involved, and the alleged harmful effect on the important interests of the aggrieved Par- ty.
4. When the Commission or the Competition Authority of South Africa decides to con- duct an investigation or intends to take any action that may have important implications for the interests of the other Party, the Parties must consult, at the request of either Party and both shall endeavour to find a mutually acceptable solution in the light of their respective important interests, giving due regard to each other’s laws, sovereignty, the independence of the respective competition authorities and to considerations of comity.
Comity. 13.1.1. The parties hereto agree that each Court is an independent, sovereign Court, entitled to pre- serve its independent jurisdiction and authority with respect to matters before it and the conduct of the RP and the Dutch Trustee.
13.1.2. Each Court shall have sole jurisdiction and power over the conduct of the Proceeding in that forum; the appointment of the RP and the Dutch Trustee and their professionals, their retention, tenure in office, and compensation; and the hearing and determination of matters arising in that forum.
13.1.3. Nothing in this Protocol is intended to in- terfere with the exercise of jurisdiction by each of the Courts in the Proceedings, or to interfere with the natural rules or ethical principles by which the RP of the Dutch Trustee is bound according to applicable national law and professional rules.”
Comity. During the Term of Employment, if the Company shall enter into any employment agreement with any other person with provisions more beneficial to such other person than those contained in this Agreement, then Executive shall be entitled to receive such beneficial provisions to the same extent as granted in such employment agreement, provided that, if the Company enters into an employment agreement with a person who is not employed by the Company as of the Effective Date and such employment agreement contains a provision relating to severance which is more beneficial to such person than the severance provision of this Agreement, Executive shall be entitled to receive such beneficial severance provision only with the consent of the Board of Directors.
Comity. The Parties agree that, whenever the Commission or the South African Competition Authority has reason to believe that anti-competitive practices, defined under Article 35, are taking place within the territory of the other authority and are substantially affecting important interests of the Parties, it may request the other Party's competition authority to take appropriate remedial action in terms of that authority's rules governing competition.
Comity. The courts of this State shall recognize and enforce liabilities for taxes lawfully imposed by another state to the same extent that the laws of that other state permit the enforcement in its courts of tax liabilities arising under this Title. The duly authorized officer of any such state may sue for the collection of such a tax in the courts of this State. A certificate by the Secretary of State of such other state that an officer suing for the collection of such a tax is duly authorized to collect the tax shall be conclusive proof of that authority. [ 1981, c. 364, §12 (NEW) .] Generated §174. Collection by civil action | 23
