Congestion Management Process. The Congestion Management Process is hereby incorporated into this Agreement and in the event there is a conflict between this Agreement and the Congestion Management Process, the Congestion Management Process prevails. The Congestion Management Process may be amended from time to time upon agreement of the Parties. Any disputes arising under the Congestion Management Process are subject to the dispute resolution provisions contained in Section 14.2 of this Agreement.
Congestion Management Process. FAMPO shall has developed and will maintain a Congestion Management Process (CMP) for the northern portion of Xxxxxxxx County that is included in the Washington DC UZA, and will coordinate with the TPB in accordance with applicable federal law and regulation, including 23 C.F.R. § 450.322, as amended., which provides a systematic process for identifying transportation system performance, usage, and efficiency, and proposed strategies to alleviate congestion, and for the effective management of new and existing transportation facilities through the use of travel demand reduction and operational management as well as other strategies. Such Aa separate CMP shall be developed and will be maintained for the northern portion of Xxxxxxxx County that is included in the Washington DC UZA, and will be coordinated with the TPB, including applicable coordination with the TPB’s federally-required Performance-Based Planning and Programming (PBPP) process. Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.31" Formatted: Highlight
Congestion Management Process. External Balancing Authority does not have a congestion management process with MISO in effect. External Balancing Authority agrees to follow applicable regulatory and other requirements, including NERC requirements and Attachment LL of the MISO Tariff, in addressing congestion management related to the Pseudo- Tie. External Balancing Authority will work with MISO to identify Coordinated Flowgates pursuant to Attachment LL of the MISO Tariff.
Congestion Management Process. FAMPO shall maintain a Congestion Management Process (CMP) for the northern portion of Xxxxxxxx County that is included in the Washington DC UZA, and will coordinate with the TPB in accordance with applicable federal law and regulation, including 23 C.F.R. § 450.322, as amended. A separate CMP shall be developed and maintained for the northern portion of Xxxxxxxx County that is included in the Washington DC UZA, and will be coordinated with the TPB, including applicable coordination with the TPB’s federally-required Performance-Based Planning and Programming (PBPP) process.
Congestion Management Process. The Congestion Management Process is herebywill be incorporated into this Agreement no later than 60 days prior to implementation of Phase 2 operations, as described in Section 3.2 of this Agreement, and in the event there is a conflict between this Agreement and the Congestion Management Process, the Congestion Management Process prevails. The Congestion Management Process may be amended from time to time upon agreement of the Parties. Any disputes arising under the Congestion Management Process are subject to the dispute resolution provisions contained in Section 14.2 of this Agreement.
Congestion Management Process. The Council, in cooperation with MnDOT and the TAB, will develop congestion management objectives and performance measures to assess the extent of congestion and support the evaluation of the effectiveness of congestion reduction and mobility enhancement strategies for the movement of goods and people. The transportation planning process will develop and maintain an ongoing congestion management process for monitoring, operating and maintaining the regional transportation system required by 23 CFR 450.320: Congestion Management Process in Transportation Management Areas.
Congestion Management Process. FAMPO shall has developed and will maintain a Congestion Management Process (CMP) for the northern portion of Xxxxxxxx County that is included in the Washington DC UZA, and will coordinate with the TPB in accordance with applicable federal law and regulation, including 23 C.F.R. § 450.322, as amended., which provides a systematic process for identifying transportation system performance, usage, and efficiency, and proposed strategies to alleviate congestion, and for the effective management of new and existing transportation facilities through the use of travel demand reduction and operational management as well as other strategies. Such a CMP will be maintained for the portion of Xxxxxxxx County that is included in the Washington DC UZA, and will be coordinated with the TPB, including applicable coordination with the TPB’s federally-required Performance-Based Planning and Programming (PBPP) process. Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.31"
Congestion Management Process. The JRCA includes the CMP to economically manage flows and congestion on the seams between PJM, TVA, and LG&E/KU. The CMP included in the JRCA is consistent with other CMPs that the Commission has accepted.77 The CMP allows the Parties to identify the transmission flowgates in each Party’s region that can be significantly impacted by the economic dispatch of generation serving load in the adjacent market, i.e., “Reciprocal Coordinated Flowgates.”78 The CMP details how flow impacts will be managed on an interregional basis and provides a process for establishing flow entitlements for network and native load transactions in one region on the Reciprocal Coordinated Flowgates in an adjacent region. Under these market (PJM)-to-non-market (TVA and LG&E/KU) protocols responsibility to redispatch or curtail transactions is shared pro rata in proportion to each Party’s firm flow entitlements, and each Party independently curtails 74 See ER19-1905 Order (accepting Duke Energy Progress-PJM JOA §§ 19.1 – 19.7); ER19-2282 Order (accepting NYISO-PJM JOA § 35.8); ER16-1304 Order (accepting MISO-PJM JOA § 18.1). 75 See JRCA §§ 15.1 – 15.13. 76 See ER19-1905 Order (Duke Energy Progress-PJM JOA §§ 12 –16); ER19-2282 Order (accepting NYISO-PJM JOA §§ 8, 14, 18 –19); ER16-1304 Order (accepting MISO-PJM JOA §§ 18.2 – 18.3, 18.6 – 18.8). 77 See, e.g., ER19-1905 Order (accepting Duke Energy Progress-PJM JOA). The Commission has relied on the CMP in the current JRCA in evaluating a pseudo-tie-related complaint. See Brookfield Energy Mktg. LP, 171 FERC ¶ 61,151, at P 53 (“PJM explains that coordination of flowgates between itself and TVA is governed by a Congestion Management Process (CMP) document contained in the Joint Reliability Coordination Agreement (JRCA) between PJM and TVA. PJM explains Section 6 of the CMP states that reciprocal coordination agreements can be executed on ‘a market-to-market basis, a market-to-non-market basis, and a non-market-to-non-market basis.’ According to PJM, the CMP further states that the agreement to allocate flowgate capability is not dependent on any entity operating a centralized energy market and only requires that a set of flowgates be defined upon which coordination shall occur and an agreement to perform such coordination.” (footnotes omitted)).
Congestion Management Process. The transportation planning process will develop and maintain an ongoing congestion management process for monitoring, operating and maintaining the regional transportation system required by 23 CFR 450.320 Congestion Management Process in Transportation Management Areas. The MPO, in cooperation with TxDOT, Transit Providers and local officials will develop congestion management objectives and performance measures to assess the extent of congestion and support the evaluation of the effectiveness of congestion reduction and mobility enhancement strategies for the movement of goods and people.
Congestion Management Process. A Case Study: Atlanta Regional Commission. FHWA & FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation. December, 2010. xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxx/planning/congestion_management_process/case_st udies/ 47. Congestion Management Process: A Case Study: Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. FHWA & FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation. December, 2010. xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxx/planning/congestion_management_process/case_st udies/ 48. Congestion Management Process: A Case Study: Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. FHWA & FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation. December, 2010. xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxx/planning/congestion_management_process/case_st udies/ 49. Congestion Management Process: A Case Study: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission. FHWA & FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation. December, 2010. xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxx/planning/congestion_management_process/case_st udies/ 50. Congestion Management Process: A Case Study: Puget Sound Regional Council. FHWA & FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation. December, 2010. xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxx/planning/congestion_management_process/case_st udies/ 51. Congestion Management Process: A Case Study: Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission. FHWA & FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation. December, 2010. xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxx/planning/congestion_management_process/case_st udies/ 52. Congestion Management Process: A Case Study: Wilmington Area Planning Council. FHWA & FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation. December, 2010. xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxx/planning/congestion_management_process/case_st udies/
