Cost/Benefit engineering reviews — Construction Manager shall review cost to include not only the aspects of pricing but also will focus on the aspect that “time equal’s money” in construction projects.
Cost/Benefit. Revenue to be invoiced or Estimated cost savings (provide detail how derived) $ Cost (number of hours to complete at $55/hour) $............................... Estimated profit generated $ APPROVALS:Change Approved: ______ Change Not Approved: ______ Hold (Future Enhancement): ______ 1. Signature ____________________________________________Date: ____/____/____ 2. Signature ____________________________________________Date: ____/____/____ 3. Signature ____________________________________________Date: ____/____/____ Exhibit 6 Additional services Change Control Form
Cost/Benefit. Using specific and measurable data, what is the benefit of doing the project? What are the costs associated with the current situation that would change? Target Dates: List at least 4-5 dates that may include when the project would begin, end and crucial milestones.
Cost/Benefit. Approach MAVF Principle 6 5 – Risk-Adjusted LevelsScaled Units Apply a Risk Attitude Function to the Monetized Levels of an Attribute or Attributes (from Row 6)
Cost/Benefit. The Seattle/LWC UPA evaluation excludes two of the 12 analyses included in the National Evaluation Framework, “Goods Movement” and “Business Impacts,” because the local partners do not expect significant impacts in those areas and wish to focus limited evaluation resources on other, more critical, evaluation areas. For each of the 10 Seattle/LWC UPA evaluation analyses, key hypotheses and questions to be addressed are presented. The hypotheses describe the results that the UPA projects are expected to produce, including benefits such as throughput improvements, congestion reduction, expanded traveler choices, improved mobility, and related outcomes. In a few cases, unwanted side-effects of the UPA investments are hypothesized. For each hypothesis and question, measures of effectiveness (XXXx) are presented. These are measurable aspects of the Seattle/LWC deployment effects that speak to the evaluation hypotheses and questions. Each analysis discussion includes a table which summarizes the hypotheses/questions being asked, relevant XXXx, and the data required to compute those XXXx. Accompanying text discusses key aspects of the planned analytic approach and related matters. The latest Term Sheet between the local partners and U.S. DOT (September 30, 2009), shows that vehicles with 3 or more passengers will pay discounted tolls or no tolls on SR 520. However, that issue in general as well as any specific approaches to high occupancy vehicles are still being considered by the local partners and U.S. DOT. Although this evaluation plan includes vehicle occupancy and other data collection relevant to HOV-related inquiries, it does not necessarily contain all of the HOV-related evaluation activities that may be needed, depending on the final approach taken by the local partners. When the local partners and U.S. DOT have resolved this issue the evaluation approach will be adjusted as necessary and reflected in the test plans.
Cost/Benefit. (1) The Contractor’s Post Payment Recovery processes will not require the Contractor to spend more on an individual claim basis than the threshold limits established by the State Plan. (2) The Contractor will use Cost Avoidance procedures to avoid payment on any claim where TPL is on file, other than those in subsection 18.10 below.
Cost/Benefit. The total GFA proposed in Task 2 of the Study had been reduced significantly compared to the development restrictions set out in OZPs. The refined MLP has further reduced the GFA in Site 1 and 2. It is reasonable to assume that a reduction in GFA would reduce the Cost Benefit performance of the Study Area. However, proper CB analysis is not possible at this stage due to unavailability of some important data as the study is still at a design conceptual stage. NCH development shall however bring a significant amount of commercial/ business opportunities creating a significant number of new jobs. These economic benefits may be emerged in various forms: through provision of commercial spaces (office, retail etc), and other recreational facilities. Besides, proposed leisure and entertainment developments with variety of tourist-oriented activities along the harbourfront will also attract tourists and hence benefit the tourism sector. The proposed waterfront promenade and other leisure facilities in the development are expected to enhance the attractiveness to locals and visitors. Development of ferry piers, leisure hub centers and hotels/retail/entertainment centers would help boost the tourism industry.
Cost/Benefit. The Xxxxxx One copier/printer fleet will be renewed for a 5-year term at a slight monthly cost savings to the District for the 21/22 school year. The purchase is covered under national and state cooperative pricing. The total proposed expenditure is $8,019.27 per month ($96,231.24 annual) and will be paid from the District Printer/Copier Fleet Lease budget.
Cost/Benefit. Approach MAVF Principle 3 – Comparison Use a measurable proxy for an Attribute that is logically necessary but not directly measurable. This principle only applies when a necessary Attribute is not directly measurable. For example, a measure of the number of complaints about service received can be used as a proxy for customer satisfaction.
Cost/Benefit. For each of these analyses, key hypotheses and questions to be addressed are presented. The hypotheses describe the results that the UPA projects are expected to produce, including benefits such as throughput improvements, congestion reduction, expanded traveler choices, improved mobility, and related outcomes. In a few cases, unwanted side-effects of the UPA investments are hypothesized. For each hypothesis and question, measures of effectiveness (XXXx) are presented. These are measurable aspects of the San Francisco deployment effects that relate to the evaluation hypotheses and questions. Each analysis discussion includes a table which summarizes the hypotheses/questions being asked, relevant XXXx, and the data required to compute those XXXx. Accompanying text discusses key aspects of the planned analytic approach and related matters.
