Cost Responsibilities. Attached as Exhibit “C” to this Lease is a Work Letter Agreement for Tenant Improvements, and Exhibit “D,” Cost Responsibilities of Lessor and Lessee, which together with this Section 2.04, describe the planning and payment responsibilities of the Lessor and Lessee with respect to the construction of the Shell Building and Tenant Improvements at the Premises. All approved Tenant Improvements shall be constructed in accordance with a construction schedule approved by Lessor and no portion of the Building interior shall remain unimproved.
Cost Responsibilities. (a) Landlord: Landlord will pay up to the amount of the Tenant Improvement Allowance for the cost of the Tenant Improvements.
Cost Responsibilities. (a) Landlord: Landlord will pay up to the amount of the Tenant allowance for the cost of the improvements.
Cost Responsibilities. Each Developer will be responsible for its respective Invoice Share of the monthly costs incurred by Affected Transmission Owner in performing the EPC Services; provided, however, that the Developer will not be responsible for any cost above the Developer Common SUF Cost Cap, except as set forth in Article 6.1.3. On a periodic basis as set forth in the Milestones in Appendix A, Affected Transmission Owner shall provide to the other Parties in writing an updated estimate of its cost for performing the EPC Services. The updated cost estimate shall fully specify any additional services and equipment required for the Affected Transmission Owner to perform the EPC Services and explain why these additional services and equipment are required. If the Affected Transmission Owner’s updated cost estimate as provided under Article 6.1.2 is greater than the estimated cost for such services as determined by the Interconnection Facilities Study for Class Year 2017, each Developer’s responsibility for any costs above its Developer Common SUF Cost Cap shall be determined in accordance with Section 25.8.6 of Attachment S of the ISO OATT. The Parties shall amend this Agreement if there are any changes to the Developer Common SUF Cost Cap required by Section 25.8.6 of Attachment S of the ISO OATT. If the final cost incurred by the Affected Transmission Owner in performing the EPC Services is less than the estimated cost for such services as determined by the Interconnection Facilities Study for Class Year 2017 and set forth in Appendix A, then the Affected Transmission Owner shall make a true-up payment to each Developer pursuant to Article 7.2 to refund to the Developer any costs that the Developer has paid to the Affected Transmission Owner under Article 6.1.1 that are greater than its Invoice Share of the actual costs. Affected Transmission Owner shall be solely responsible for its costs in performing the EPC Services that are not recoverable from Developers under this Article 6.1.
Cost Responsibilities. Interconnection Customer and/or System Owner, as specified in Appendix A, shall perform the Construction Services at Interconnection Customer’s sole expense up to the Upgrades Estimated Total Cost Amount. Interconnection Customer’s and System Owner’s respective responsibilities for the cost of the Construction Services greater than the Upgrades Estimated Total Costs Amount shall be determined in accordance with, as applicable, Section 25.8.6 of Attachment S or Section 40.16.3 of Attachment HH to the OATT.
Cost Responsibilities. Each Developer will be responsible for its respective Invoice Share of the monthly costs incurred by Affected Transmission Owner in performing the EPC Services;
Cost Responsibilities. In this Agreement, the phrases “at Concessionaire’s sole cost and expense”, “at Concessionaire’s cost and expense”, “the Concessionaire shall be responsible for providing”, “the Concessionaire shall pay” and similar phrases and provisions that require the Concessionaire to take certain actions or perform certain services, shall not mean that such costs or expenses, or the costs and expenses associated with such actions or activities, are necessarily subject to recovery as part of the Utility Fee or otherwise in accordance with this Agreement. The inclusion of such costs and expenses in the Utility Fee shall be determined in accordance with Schedule 5.
Cost Responsibilities. Developer shall perform the EPC Services described in Appendix A, and as otherwise set forth by the terms of this Agreement, at Developer’s sole expense up to the ASO Estimated Total Costs amount. The Developer’s and Affected System Operator’s respective responsibilities for the cost of Developer’s performance of the EPC Services above the ASO Estimated Total Costs SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 2794 amount shall be determined in accordance with Section 25.8.6 of Attachment S to the NYISO OATT. Provision and Application of Security Developer has provided Affected System Operator with Security in the amount of the ASO Estimated Total Costs for the Affected System Upgrade Facilities in accordance with Attachment S to the ISO OATT. If the Developer: (i) does not pay an invoice issued by Affected System Operator pursuant to Article 8.1 within the timeframe set forth in Article 8.3 or (ii) does not pay any disputed amount into an independent escrow account pursuant to Article 8.4, the Affected System Operator may draw upon Developer’s Security to recover such payment. The Developer’s Security shall be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis for Developer’s payments made to the Affected System Operator for its performance of the EPC Services.
Cost Responsibilities. With respect to costs, NPS agrees to pay for the following: a) title policy for property it will receive; and b) the cost of constructing a kiosk as specified in Section 5 above. KBS agrees to pay for the following: a) land surveys and the development of final legal descriptions; b) costs described in Section 3 and Section 6 above; and c) the cost of constructing the Tufa Trail, trail extension on the Finger Parcel, and the Monument Trailhead Access Improvements as to the extent specified in Section 5 and Section 7 above. CNLV agrees to pay for all costs related to CNLV's own processes that are not to be covered by KBS as specifically set forth in this Agreement. CNLV and NPS agree to equally share the costs of any escrow used to close the Exchange. Each party shall also be responsible for its respective cost responsibilities as more particularly set forth in the NPS Deed and CNLV Deed. The provisions of this Section 8 shall survive the Closing of the Exchange.
Cost Responsibilities. With respect to costs, NPS agrees to pay for the following: a) title report for property it will receive; b) costs associated with the requisite public notice requirements; c) the cost of deed preparation; and d) the cost of constructing a kiosk as specified in Section 8 above. KBS agrees to pay for the following: a) land surveys and the development of legal descriptions; b) Environmental Site Assessments;
