Decisions and Voting Sample Clauses

Decisions and Voting. 11.9.1 Decisions of the MCC shall be by consensus. The union in the JIB and Building Services Engineering Section 5: Industrial Agreements Representing the interests of all Electrical and Mechanical contracting and Engineering Construction workers The Union for all skilled, professional & technical workers Benefits Include: • Representation by specialist officials for all employment related matters • Specialist Legal advice, aid and representation • A comprehensive range of individual union benefits If you have a problem at work our team of dedicated officers and workplace representatives provide professional support, advice and representation on a wide range of issues such as: • Disciplinary matters • Grievances and Disputes • Redundancy • Health & Safety • Apprenticeships, Skills and Training Unite is the only union recognised to represent and negotiate on behalf of employees in the Electrical Contracting industry through the JIB and it's procedures. For information about joining please ring 0800 709 007 or join online at xxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx 159 (JN2421)(4) 011119 s und ation, advance your velopment Fund is here o promote a higher standard Go further with the JIB Skill Development F TRAINING If you want to further your educ craft, or upskill, the JIB Skills De for you. It has been established t of technical knowledge and craftsmanship across the electrotechnical industry.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Decisions and Voting.  All decisions of the Executive Board will, wherever possible, be by unanimous decision. Where a unanimous decision is not expressly required the decision will be made by majority vote. If there is a voting deadlock of the voting members of the Executive Board, the SMS-IC Chair will have the casting vote except where the SMS-IC Chair has declared he/she has a Conflict in respect of that vote.  The Executive Board will not be entitled to make any decision to: o change the funding contributions of an Industrial Partner; o select Exemplar Projects o select an SMS-IC Chair or an SMS-IC Director until such times as it has consulted each of the Industrial Partners  The Executive Board will not be entitled to make any decision to: o change the location of the SMS-IC o adopt or, once adopted, amend the Strategic Plan o amend the selection criteria for Exemplar Projects; and/ or o adopt or, once adopted, amend the procedure by which Core Partners and Affiliate Partners join the SMS-IC until such times as it has consulted each of the Core Partners and taken reasonable account of any representations which they make in respect of such decision.  The Executive Board may delegate any of its powers to a committee consisting of one or more of its members. It may also delegate to the SMS-IC Director such of its powers as it considers desirable to be exercised by the SMS-IC Director. Any such delegation may be made subject to such conditions as the Executive Board deems appropriate and may be revoked and altered as the Executive Board may determine.  At each meeting of the Executive Board, the following standing items will be included in the agenda: o approving the minutes of the previous meeting o reviewing SMS-IC's financial performance, including performance against financial plan and the approved annual budget o reviewing progress against the key performance indicators set out in the business plan for SMS-IC o reviewing the SMS-IC risk register.  Except as set out in terms of reference, the Executive Board may regulate its proceedings as it deems fit.
Sample 1
Decisions and Voting. 11.9.1 Decisions of the MCC shall be by consensus.
Sample 1

Related to Decisions and Voting

  • Conclusions and Recommendations The demonstration and evaluation process provided an opportunity to test community specific tools with a range of end users from the memory institution domain and to gain greater insight into both the current and future evolution of the SHAMAN prototypes for preservation, access and re-use. Xxxx et al. (2000) in their user evaluation study of the Alexandria Digital Library which incorporated the evaluation of a Web prototype by earth scientists, information specialists and educators raised four key questions in relation to their findings that SHAMAN may be well advised to consider, they are paraphrased here with our conclusions from the investigations. What have we learned about our target organizations and potential users?  Memory institutions are most definitely not a homogenised group; their needs and requirements differ greatly across the domain.  Representatives of the archives community are agreed on the benefits of SHAMAN‟s authenticity validation function.  The representatives of government information services remained unconvinced as to the need or benefit of grid technologies or distributed ingest while librarians saw the value of grid access as an asset of the framework. What have we learned about the evaluation approach for digital preservation?  Within the limits of the exercise, in terms of time-frame and resources, the approach adopted has generated useful information for the further development of demonstrators and for the development of the SHAMAN framework overall. What have we learned about the SHAMAN ISP1 demonstrator?  Respondents to the evaluation questionnaires and the focus groups indicate that, overall, the presentation of the demonstrator worked effectively and that, in general, participants in the demonstration and evaluation events were able to understand the intentions of the demonstration and to apply the ideas presented to their own context. What have we learned about the applicability of the SHAMAN framework to memory institutions?  Respondents to the questionnaires and participants in the focus groups readily identified the value of the SHAMAN framework to their own operations. The majority had not yet established a long-term digital preservation policy, but recognized the need. Generally, the concepts of distributed ingest and grid operations found favour.  Virtually all practitioners in the focus groups, however, drew attention to need of a lower level demonstration that would be closer to their everyday preservation troubles, especially for digital preservation to be applied to non-textual materials, such as film, photographs and sound archives. In addition to the criteria suggested by Xxxx et al., we can add a further project-related question: What have we learned that has implications for the training and dissemination phase of the Project?  It was not part of the remit of the demonstration and evaluation specifically to discover information of relevance to the training and dissemination function. However, a number of factors will affect the efficacy of any training programme in particular. o First, no common understanding of digital preservation can be assumed of the potential target audiences for training. Consequently, it is likely that self-paced learning materials will be most effective in presenting the SHAMAN framework. o Secondly, the aims of SHAMAN as a project must be conveyed clearly: specifically, that it is a kind of „proof-of-concept‟ project and is not intended to deliver a package of programs capable of being implemented by institutions. o Thirdly, it needs to be emphasised that the SHAMAN framework is not limited to text documents; it can be applied to materials of all kinds. However, the demonstrations relate to bodies of material that were actually available for use. o Fourthly, the existing presentation materials are capable of being adapted for use in training activities. o Finally, the target audiences will appreciate the possibility of online access to the demonstrator, which will need to have very great ease of access in order that people with diverse backgrounds are able to use it with equal facility. We believe that, overall, WP14 has met its aims and objectives in this demonstration and evaluation of ISP1. Valuable lessons have been learnt by all parties involved, which will be transferred to the evaluation of ISP2 in the coming months.

  • GENERAL PROVISIONS AND RECITALS 12 1. The parties agree that the terms used, but not otherwise defined in the Common Terms and

  • Decisions of the Board The decision of the majority shall be the decision of the Board. Where there is no majority decision, the decision of the Chairperson shall be the decision of the Board. The decision of the Board of Arbitration shall be final and binding and enforceable on all parties, but in no event shall the Board of Arbitration have the power to change this Agreement or to alter, modify or amend any of its provisions. However, the Board shall have the power to dispose of any discharge or a discipline grievance by any arrangement which in its opinion it deems just and equitable.

  • Representations and Recommendations Unless otherwise stated in writing, neither Xxxxxxxx Realty Inc, nor its brokers or licensees have made, on their own behalf, any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to any element of the Property including but not limited to, the legal sufficiency, legal effect, or tax consequences of this transaction. Any information furnished by either party should be independently verified before that party relies on such information. Xxxxxxxx Realty Inc. recommends that Buyer consult its attorneys and accountants before signing this Agreement regarding the terms and conditions herein and that Seller satisfy itself as to the financial ability of Buyer to perform.

  • Exclusions and Limitations The aforementioned “Limited Warranty” does not apply to any Products which have been subjected to

  • Decisions by Members Whenever in this Agreement reference is made to the decision, consent, approval, judgment, or action of the Members, unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, such decision, consent, approval, judgment, or action shall mean a Majority of the Members.

  • REVISIONS AND AMENDMENTS Any revisions or amendments to this Agreement must be made in writing and signed by both parties.

  • Submissions on Behalf of Others Should You wish to submit work that is not Your original creation, You may submit it to OIDF separately from any Contribution, identifying the complete details of its source and of any license or other restriction (including, but not limited to, related patents, trademarks, and license agreements) of which you are personally aware, and conspicuously marking the work as "Submitted on behalf of a third-party: [named here]".

  • EXCLUSIONS AND EXCEPTIONS 12.1 DBS shall not be responsible or liable to the Cardmember or any Cardholder for any loss or damage incurred or suffered as a consequence of:

  • Conclusion and Recommendations D. Evaluations for Offenders without a sex offense conviction shall answer the following additional referral questions in the evaluations:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!