Description of DIP Preparation Process Sample Clauses

Description of DIP Preparation Process. Since the start of the project, SAWSO and Chikankata Health Services (CHS) have worked with the other Chikankata Child Survival Project (CCSP) partners to complete several of the first-year activities. After being hired, CCSP and CHS staff have conducted orientations with all project partners and with communities. SAWSO facilitated the baseline knowledge, practice, and coverage (KPC) training, and project partners participated in training, data collection, and data analysis. CCSP field staff, in coordination with health center staff, are currently conducting a census and mapping exercises of all villages in the project area. Two Task Force meetings have been held, the second being a part of the DIP preparation process. Participants at this workshop included members of Chikankata Health Services, SAWSO, the Churches Health Association of Zambia (CHAZ), District Health Management Team (DHMT) members from Mazabuka and Siavonga, World Vision Zambia, Plan Zambia, and Harvest Help Zambia. The workshop lasted two days and included a review of the CCSP objectives, review and discussion of baseline survey results, presentation and discussion of new methodologies (Care Group and Hearth Models), revisions to planned intervention activities and analysis of opportunities and potential problems, discussion of methods for optimal coordination between partners, and review of roles and responsibilities of project partners. This workshop was followed up with further meetings between SAWSO and the CCSP and CHS outreach staff. Data from the workshop and these discussions were integrated into the original proposal plan to develop this DIP. Although all partners participated in the design of the DIP, the SAWSO Health Program Officer wrote the final document. XXXXX and TSA/Zambia are grateful to the many reviewers of the first version of the DIP and have incorporated many of their comments and suggestions into this second version.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Description of DIP Preparation Process. The steps taken to prepare this DIP included several key activities. A comprehensive Knowledge, Practice, and Coverage (KPC) Survey was conducted targeting women with children under the age of 2 years, women in reproductive age, men, and youth. A sample of 300 from each group was obtained. In addition to this, a Health Facility Assessment (HFA) including twenty instruments was also conducted in a total of 14 health facilities; 2 in the Oblast and 6 across the two project rayons. Subsequent to this month-long quantitative data collection activity, Project HOPE staff and consultant undertook a four-day qualitative study in the program project rayons. Six Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were held in both the Asky and the Bazakorgon Rayons. In this forum program staff and consultant talked to a total of 28 health facility service providers, 33 mothers of young children, 22 men, 8 grandmothers, 25 youth and 14 community leaders. To culminate this work, a two-day planning workshop was held that included the participation of 32 individuals coming from the central Ministry of Health, the oblast and rayon health services, program partners and staff. The Baseline Assessment report is included in Appendix 1; and the list of DIP workshop participants, along with the agenda and working groups is included in Appendix 2. Program activities undertaken since the award began with the recruitment and hiring of a Program Director, Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx and 5 technical and 2 administrative staff, plus 2 drivers and a guard. See Appendix 3 for CVs pf all key staff. Project HOPE subsequently located and renovated office space office in an unused wing of the Children’s Hospital. Also achieved during this start-up period was the procurement of necessary office and program supplies and equipment, as well as vehicles. Program staff received orientation on program priorities and strategies as outlined in the proposal, and participated in some training activities. Meetings with partners were held and discussions around the issue of partnership, responsibilities and contributions of each partner.
Sample 1

Related to Description of DIP Preparation Process

  • Preparation of Presentence Report The defendant understands the United States will provide to the Court and the United States Probation Office a government version of the offense conduct. This may include information concerning the background, character, and conduct of the defendant, including the entirety of his criminal activities. The defendant understands these disclosures are not limited to the count to which he has pleaded guilty. The United States may respond to comments made or positions taken by the defendant or the defendant’s counsel and to correct any misstatements or inaccuracies. The United States further reserves its right to make any recommendations it deems appropriate regarding the disposition of this case, subject only to any limitations set forth in this plea agreement. The United States and the defendant expressly reserve the right to speak to the Court at the time of sentencing pursuant to Rule 32(i)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Negotiation Process (a) If either the Chief Executive Officer of ICANN (“CEO”) or the Chairperson of the Registry Stakeholder Group (“Chair”) desires to discuss any revision(s) to this Agreement, the CEO or Chair, as applicable, shall provide written notice to the other person, which shall set forth in reasonable detail the proposed revisions to this Agreement (a “Negotiation Notice”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the CEO nor the Chair may

  • Joint Preparation The preparation of this Agreement has been a joint effort of the parties and the resulting documents shall not, solely as a matter of judicial construction, be construed more severely against one of the parties than the other.

  • Application Process The employees wishing to enter into a job share arrangement will apply in writing to the Employer and forward a copy to the Union outlining the proposed commencement date of the job share, how the hours and days of work will be shared and how communication and continuity of work will be maintained. The Employer shall communicate a decision on a job share request in writing to the applicants. Applications to Job Sharing shall not be unreasonably denied.

  • OBJECTIVE AND PREPARATION Offer, acceptance and performance (Clause 2). 2 F: ……….… V: ….……… T: ….……... Item Documents (Clause 3). Clause 3.1 is deleted and substituted with: 'This tender is for a Government Contract. No Payment Guarantee will be provided.' Clause 3.3 is deleted and substituted with: The principal agent shall complete the schedule and arrange for formal signing of the agreement once the priced bill of quantities/lump sum document, security, insurances and waiver of lien, where acceptable, have been provided and effected'. 3 F: ……….… V: ….……… T: ….……... Item Design responsibility (Clause 4). 4 F: ……….… V: ….……… T: ….……... Item Employer's agents (Clause 5). 5 F: ……….… V: ….……… T: ….……... Item Site representative (Clause 6). 6 F: ……….… V: ….……… T: ….……... Item Compliance with regulations (Clause 7). 7 F: ……….… V: ….……… T: ….……... Item

  • Surface Preparation Clean the surface to be treated of all dust, dirt, clay, grass, sod and any other deleterious matter before application of the asphalt surface treatment.

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

  • Escalation Process 9.1. There will be times when the pharmacist will need additional advice or will need to escalate the patient to a higher acuity care location (e.g. back to their GP or an Urgent Treatment Centre or A&E).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.