Discussions with Offerors. In the initial phase of the evaluation process, the Lead State will review all proposals timely received. Unacceptable proposals (non-responsive proposals not conforming to RFP requirements) will be eliminated from further consideration. The Lead State reserves the right to award on receipt of initial proposals without an opportunity for discussion or proposal revision, so Offerors are encouraged to submit their most favorable proposal at the time established for receipt of proposals. Offerors shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and/or written revisions of proposals. In conducting discussions, there shall be no disclosure of any information derived from proposals submitted by competing Offerors.
Discussions with Offerors. The Lead State may conduct discussions with Offerors in accordance with Alaska Statute AS 36.30.240 and Alaska Administrative Code 2 AAC 12.
Discussions with Offerors. The Lead State reserves the right to award on receipt of initial Proposals without an opportunity for discussion or Proposal revision, so Offerors are encouraged to submit their most favorable Proposal at the time established for receipt of Proposals. Offerors shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and/or written revisions of Proposals. In conducting discussions, there shall be no disclosure of any information derived from Proposals submitted by competing Offerors. In accordance with Oklahoma Statutes, 74 O.S. § 85.5, the State of Oklahoma reserves the right to negotiate with one, selected, all or none of the Offerors responding to this solicitation to obtain the best value for the Lead State. Negotiations could entail discussions on products, services, pricing, contract terminology or any other issues that mitigate the Lead State’s risks. The Lead State will consider all issues negotiable and not artificially constrained by internal corporate policies. Negotiation may be with one or more Offerors, for any and all items in the Offeror’s Proposal. Firms that contend that they lack flexibility because of their corporate policy on a particular negotiation item may face a significant disadvantage and may not be considered. If such negotiations are conducted, the following conditions shall apply: Negotiations may be conducted in person, in writing, or by telephone. Negotiations will only be conducted with Offerors’ that submitted potentially acceptable Proposals. The State reserves the right to limit negotiations to those Proposals that received the highest rankings during the initial evaluation phase. Terms, conditions, prices, methodology, or other features of the Offeror’s Proposal may be subject to negotiations and subsequent revision. As part of the negotiations, the Offeror may be required to submit supporting financial, pricing, and other data in order to allow a detailed evaluation of the feasibility, reasonableness, and acceptability of the Proposal. The mandatory requirements of the RFP shall not be negotiable and shall remain unchanged unless the Lead State determines that a change in such requirements is in the best interest of the Lead State. BEST and FINAL – The state may request best and final offers if deemed necessary, and will determine the scope and subject of any best and final request; however, the Offeror should not expect that the state will ask for best and finals to give the Offeror an ...
Discussions with Offerors. The Lead State may conduct discussions with Offerors in accordance with AS 36.30.240 and 2 AAC 12.
Discussions with Offerors. In the initial phase of the evaluation process, the Lead State will review all proposals timely received. Unacceptable proposals (non-responsive proposals not conforming to RFP requirements) will be eliminated from further consideration. The Lead State reserves the right to award on receipt of initial proposals without an opportunity for discussion or proposal revision, so Offerors are encouraged to submit their most favorable proposal at the time established for receipt of proposals. Offerors shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and/or written revisions of proposals. In conducting discussions, there shall be no disclosure of any information derived from proposals submitted by competing Offerors. Questions, including those about Terms and Conditions, must be submitted, in writing, to the Lead State Contract Administrator, by the date and time noted above, in order to be considered. Written questions must be submitted, using Attachment (Enter Attachment Number), “Offeror Questions”, and sent via email to the Lead State Contract Administrator. Official answers to all written questions should be posted on the State’s website as an addendum to the RFP.
Discussions with Offerors. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to conduct written or oral discussions with all, some or none of the Offerors. Offerors will be notified of the date, time, and place for any such oral discussions. Any such discussions will be conducted in accordance with FAA acquisition policies and procedures.
Discussions with Offerors. Ogden City may conduct discussions with offeror’s who submit Bids determined to have a reasonable chance of being selected for award. However, Bids may be accepted without such discussions, at Ogden City’s option. Any supplemental information provided to an offeror that was not included in the RFP will be made available to all offeror’s if a primary contact person and e-mail address has been provided.
Discussions with Offerors. If discussions with offerors are required to make a selection, the discussions will be conducted in accordance with HAR § 3-122-53. Pursuant to HAR § 3-122-53, a priority list will be established consisting of up to three Offerors. If more than three acceptable or potentially acceptable proposals have been submitted, the priority list will be limited through evaluation and ranking to the Offerors who submitted the highest-ranked proposals.
