Enforcement Measures Clause Samples

Enforcement Measures. (a) The Government of Japan confirms its commitment to strictly enforce the AMA, in all industries including the insurance sector, against practices that, in light of market structure and other factors as appropriate, constitute violations of the AMA, such as private monopolization, unreasonable restraints of trade, or unfair trade practices. (b) The Government of Japan, while noting the Report by the Insurance Council, will review, by Fiscal Year 1995, AMA exemptions stipulated in the Insurance Business Law.

Enforcement Measures. DOE/PS is responsible for enforcing the Restrictions and Obligations in the Planning Agreement. Where there is a clear or threatened breach of the Agreement DOE/PS can take enforcement action by injunction. This, by its very nature, is a protracted process and one which there is an understandable reticence to pursue.

Enforcement Measures. International agreements often leave the power to enforce their requirements to the states that join the regimes they operate. IGOs are, however, sometimes assigned authority to collect evidence, hold hearings, make determinations, or impose and enforce remedies against offending states for violations of commitments. The very first, modern, multilateral arrangements, adopted to regularize the collection of tariffs, encourage commerce, and reduce pollution in the Rhine River authorized officials to determine whether violations of commitments were taking place, and ultimately to collect and distribute tariffs to the parties in accordance with an agreed formula.64 A more recent example is ICAO’s power to make and issue findings that an airport is insufficiently secure, where “the practical effect of such a declara- tion would be to close the airport to international use.”65 A variety of enforcement powers could conceivably be given to entities assigned cyber-security tasks. Among the most common types of enforcement measures would be the usual powers to estab- lish a budget, to allocate financial obligations to parties, and to suspend the voting rights (or right to participate) of parties that fail to pay their shares of the financial burden of the agency’s operations. Authority could also be created for determining responsibility for cyberattacks or exploitation and imposing penalties on non-state actors, including monetary damages and the suspension of licenses. 62An example of a controversial disclosure is discussed in a Wall Street Journal article published on June 14, 2010, “Compute Experts Face Backlash,” B6, col. 1, describes how a group collectively called Goatse Security disclosed a flaw in AT&T’s website that made iPad owners’ email addresses public. Other experts condemned the disclosure, and the FBI reportedly opened an investigation of the incident. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, founder of the Black Hat security conference said: “We’ve been having this conversation for 15 years,” and still not everyone agrees what is “responsible” disclosure. 63Experts appear to regard Windows to be relatively insecure, for example, creating widespread vulnerability. Google, Inc., is reported to have recently instructed its personnel that they may not use Windows on the company’s non-portable computers. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, “Google ditches Windows on security concerns,” Financial Times, May 31, 2010, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇. ▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇/▇/▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇. ...

Enforcement Measures. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Agreement, the Company, without any liability and/or notice (to a Client) shall be entitled to the following enforcement measures: AG(i) refuse Rto completeEor executEe a transMaction, block, caEncel (voidN) or T suspend any executed or processed transaction on the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ Online Trading Platform despite the fact they have been confirmed by the Company. The Company reserves the right to return the Parties of the Agreement (the situation) to the position that they were in before the Transaction was made, and/or

Enforcement Measures. In light of the above, the Respondents undertake upon themselves the following enforcement measures and undertake to carry out the actions imposed on them by virtue of the same means of enforcement:

Enforcement Measures. 31 16.6 Indemnification................................................ 32 16.7

Enforcement Measures. Any Enforcement Measure that has been approved pursuant to Section 4.2 above, clause I, subclause (c), may be taken by the Lenders that approved such Enforcement Measure (any such Lender, an “Enforcing Lender”), provided that: I. the Enforcing Lenders shall grant to the remaining Lenders (any such Lender, a “Non-Enforcing Lender”) the term of 10 (ten) Business Days from the date such Enforcement Measure has been approved for the Non-Enforcing Lenders inform their interest to become a party to such Enforcement Measure, by providing all necessary documents to the law firm selected by the Enforcing Lenders, when such Non-Enforcing Lenders that chose to do so will also become Enforcing Lenders; II. for each jurisdiction where a judicial Enforcement Measure is taken, such judicial Enforcement Measure will be initiated by the Enforcing Lenders in one single lawsuit, by a single law firm, which will represent the Enforcing Lenders; III. each of the Enforcing Lenders shall provide the selected law firm of the relevant jurisdiction(s) with all necessary documents, including the respective ad judicia power of attorney, within 10 (ten) Business Days from the date the law firm has been selected; IV. notwithstanding the reimbursement right for all fees, costs and expenses incurred by the Lenders pursuant to the Loan Documents, the Enforcing Lenders shall share on a pro rata basis all fees, costs and expenses related to any Enforcement Measures, including the fees and expenses of the selected law firm in each jurisdiction, provided, further, that, in case any Enforcing Lender fails to make any such payment, the amounts due by such defaulting Enforcing Lender shall be offset with any pro rata share of the Enforcement Net Proceeds that are due to such defaulting Enforcing Lender; V. any Enforcement Net Proceeds received by any Enforcing Lender shall be shared on a pro rata basis exclusively among the Enforcing Lenders; and VI. any Enforcement Net Proceeds received by any Non-Enforcing Lender as a result of any individual or joint Enforcement Measure taken by one or more Non-Enforcing Lenders shall be shared on a pro rata basis among the Enforcing Lenders and such Non-Enforcing Lenders.

Enforcement Measures. If the violation has not been corrected pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Notice of Violation, or, in the event of an appeal to the Board of Appeals, within 45 days of a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming or modifying the Enforcement Authority's decision, then the Enforcement Authority may recommend to the municipal officers that the Town's attorney file an enforcement action in a Maine court of competent jurisdiction under Rule 80K of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure.