PRICING STRUCTURES Licenses and Support Services for the Licensed Programs to which this OST applies are granted according to the pricing structures mentioned in the related Transaction Document. Standard pricing structures are defined in the section “DEFINITIONS” of this OST, even though those pricing structures may not be applicable to the DS Offerings to which this OST applies. Other pricing structures may be made available on a case by case basis.
Master Feeder Structure If permitted by the 1940 Act, the Board of Trustees, by vote of a majority of the Trustees, and without a Shareholder vote, may cause the Trust or any one or more Series to convert to a master feeder structure (a structure in which a feeder fund invests all of its assets in a master fund, rather than making investments in securities directly) and thereby cause existing Series of the Trust to either become feeders in a master fund, or to become master funds in which other funds are feeders.
Grading systems of the institutions [It is recommended that receiving institutions provide the statistical distribution of grades according to the descriptions in the ECTS users’ guide7. A link to a webpage can be enough. The table will facilitate the interpretation of each grade awarded to students and will facilitate the credit transfer by the sending institution.]
Payment Structure You must pay the fees listed on the relevant Services Order. Subscription payments will be structured differently based on the term you select from the three options below and the payment structure will be set forth in the Services Order. The fees identified in the Services Order are exclusive of shipping fees, and you will pay the shipping fees (if applicable) identified in the invoice.
Fee Structure In consideration of Consultant providing services, Municipality shall pay Consultant for Services performed in accordance with Exhibit A – List of Services and Fee Schedule.
Credit Structure If the PTD Service Level Standard is not met, it is a Service Issue and is considered a Service Restoration Priority 2. If the PTD metric for a pair of Customer Connections or Customer Sites is not being met, Customer may be eligible for a credit. To obtain a credit, a trouble ticket must be opened with Verizon when a PTD Service Level Standard is not being met or if a Service Issue is identified. Verizon will work with Customer to confirm that a PTD issue exists and repair the problem(s), as applicable. Once Verizon confirms that the PTD Service Level Standard is not being met, Verizon will have 30 calendar days to repair the Service to meet the PTD Service Level Standard and close the applicable trouble ticket, and in such an event, Customer will not be eligible for a credit. If, after 30 calendar days of opening the trouble ticket, the PTD Service Level Standard continues to not be met, Customer will qualify for a credit. Customer’s measurement of PTD prior to opening a trouble ticket may be considered by Verizon in determining the need to repair the Service. Packet Transit Delay (PTD) 20%
5.4.4.1 Service Issues occur between pair Ports of the Private IP Network. Consequently, two Customer connections will be impacted by each Service Issue. For Service Issue Service Level Standard credit purposes, the MRC will be defined as the average of the MRCs for each of the two impacted Customer Connections.
Management Structure Describe the overall management approach toward planning and implementing the contract. Include an organization chart for the management of the contract, if awarded.
Unbundled Loop Modifications (Line Conditioning 2.5.1 Line Conditioning is defined as routine network modification that BellSouth regularly undertakes to provide xDSL services to its own customers. This may include the removal of any device, from a copper Loop or copper Subloop that may diminish the capability of the Loop or Subloop to deliver high-speed switched wireline telecommunications capability, including xDSL service. Such devices include, load coils, excessive bridged taps, low pass filters, and range extenders. Excessive bridged taps are bridged taps that serves no network design purpose and that are beyond the limits set according to industry standards and/or the BellSouth’s TR 73600 Unbundled Local Loop Technical Specification.
2.5.2 BellSouth will remove load coils only on copper Loops and Subloops that are less than eighteen thousand (18,000) feet in length.
2.5.3 For any copper loop being ordered by NewPhone which has over six thousand (6,000) feet of combined bridged tap will be modified, upon request from NewPhone, so that the loop will have a maximum of six thousand (6,000) feet of bridged tap. This modification will be performed at no additional charge to NewPhone. Loop conditioning orders that require the removal of bridged tap that serves no network design purpose on a copper Loop that will result in a combined total of bridged tap between two thousand five hundred (2,500) and six thousand (6,000) feet will be performed at the rates set forth in Exhibit A.
2.5.4 NewPhone may request removal of any unnecessary and non-excessive bridged tap (bridged tap between zero (0) and two thousand five hundred (2,500) feet which serves no network design purpose), at rates pursuant to BellSouth’s SC Process as mutually agreed to by the Parties.
2.5.5 Rates for ULM are as set forth in Exhibit A.
2.5.6 BellSouth will not modify a Loop in such a way that it no longer meets the technical parameters of the original Loop type (e.g., voice grade, ADSL, etc.) being ordered.
2.5.7 If NewPhone requests ULM on a reserved facility for a new Loop order, BellSouth may perform a pair change and provision a different Loop facility in lieu of the reserved facility with ULM if feasible. The Loop provisioned will meet or exceed specifications of the requested Loop facility as modified. NewPhone will not be charged for ULM if a different Loop is provisioned. For Loops that require a DLR or its equivalent, BellSouth will provide LMU detail of the Loop provisioned.
2.5.8 NewPhone shall request Loop make up information pursuant to this Attachment prior to submitting a service inquiry and/or a LSR for the Loop type that NewPhone desires BellSouth to condition.
2.5.9 When requesting ULM for a Loop that BellSouth has previously provisioned for NewPhone, NewPhone will submit a SI to BellSouth. If a spare Loop facility that meets the Loop modification specifications requested by NewPhone is available at the location for which the ULM was requested, NewPhone will have the option to change the Loop facility to the qualifying spare facility rather than to provide ULM. In the event that BellSouth changes the Loop facility in lieu of providing ULM, NewPhone will not be charged for ULM but will only be charged the service order charges for submitting an order.
Project Changes 1.8.1. All changes shall be administered per the UGC.
1.8.2. Upon authorization by the Owner, the Owner or Architect/Engineer will prepare and issue all changes to the Contract affecting cost, scope and/or time as a formal Change Order to the Contract on the standard University of Texas MD Xxxxxxxx Cancer Center Change Order form. The Change Order may include separate change issues, identified as Change Proposals and field orders.
1.8.3. Upon authorization by the Owner, Change Proposals may be issued to the Architect/Engineer for pricing by the Contractor. Contractor shall submit pricing to the Owner within twenty-one (21) days and pricing shall be indicated on the standard Owner "Change in Work Cost Analysis" ("Cost Analysis") form provided in the Pre-Construction Conference Brochure. Contractor may not include a Change Proposal within a Change Order unless the Owner has accepted the Change Proposal.
1.8.3.1. The Contractor shall summarize all costs for each change at each level of subcontractor and supplier by preparing the "Cost Analysis" form, and shall provide each subcontractor's cost summary on separate "Cost Analysis" forms as backup. Additional support documentation from both the Contractor and Contractor’s subcontractors is encouraged, but such will not replace use of the standard form.
1.8.3.2. When the Contractor believes it is entitled to a time extension, Contractor shall so state as part of Contractor’s response to the Change Proposal, including a justifica- tion for a time extension. Owner may grant time extensions only if a Change Proposal affects the activities on the Longest Path of an Owner approved Work Progress Schedule; i.e., when the Work impacts the "Contract Substantial Completion Date".
1.8.3.3. If the Owner’s Project Manager and Contractor cannot mutually agree upon a fair and reasonable cost and time settlement, the Owner’s Project Manager may: 1) Reject the quotation and void the Change Proposal, 2) Issue instructions to the Contractor to proceed on a time and material basis for a price to be determined later not to exceed a fixed maximum dollar and time, or 3) Issue a Unilateral Change Order.
1.8.3.4. The Owner’s Construction Inspector and/or Owner’s Project Manager may issue field orders directly to the Contractor for minor changes to the Contract, which can be negotiated in the field. Pricing backup is at the discretion of the Owner’s Construction Inspector, but pricing backup is required for any field order, the pricing backup is to be outlined on the "Cost Analysis" form. When the Owner and Contractor have signed the field order, the Work is authorized and the field order may be included in the next Change Order.
1.8.4. Request for payment for Change Order work may be submitted only after the Change Order has been fully executed.
Alternative Structure If following the date of this Agreement all of the conditions set forth in Article VI have been satisfied or waived (except that the tax representation letters in the forms as set forth in Exhibit B-1 and called for in Section 5.14 cannot be delivered and the condition set forth in Section 6.1(e) has not been waived), but the Closing could occur if the tax representation letters in the forms set forth in Exhibit B-2 could be executed and delivered (assuming Parent alters the structure as hereafter provided in this Section 1.1(b)), Parent shall alter the structure of the business combination between Merger Sub and the Company contemplated by this Agreement, , by consummating a second-step merger of the Surviving Corporation into a limited liability company wholly-owned by Parent that is disregarded as an entity for federal tax purposes, in accordance with Delaware Law, immediately following the Merger (such second-step merger, the “Second Merger”); provided, however, that (i) such wholly-owned disregarded limited liability company shall become a party to, and shall become bound by, the terms of this Agreement and (ii) the tax representation letters in the forms set forth in Exhibit B-2 shall be executed and delivered, and (iii) any action taken pursuant to this Section 1.1(b) shall not (unless consented to in writing by the Company prior to the Closing) (x) alter or change the kind or amount of consideration to be issued to the holders of the Company’s capital stock or other securities as provided for in this Agreement or (y) otherwise cause any closing condition set forth in Article VI not to be capable of being satisfied (unless duly waived by the party entitled to the benefits thereof). If such second-step merger occurs, references to the Merger in Recital I, Section 1.10, Section 2.6(b)(xiii), Section 4.1(b)(xviii), Section 5.14 and Section 6.1(e) shall be to the Merger and the second-step merger described in this Section 1.1(b), taken together as one integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
