Grading systems of the institutions Sample Clauses

Grading systems of the institutions. [It is recommended that receiving institutions provide the statistical distribution of grades according to the descriptions in the ECTS users’ guide7. A link to a webpage can be enough. The table will facilitate the interpretation of each grade awarded to students and will facilitate the credit transfer by the sending institution.]
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Grading systems of the institutions. It is recommended that receiving institutions provide the statistical distribution of grades or make the information available through EGRACONS according to the descriptions in the ECTS users’ guide10. The table will facilitate the interpretation of each grade awarded to students and will facilitate the credit transfer by the sending institution. CZ BRNO05 N/A xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xx/images/files/Incoming/Student/practicalities/_ Grading_system_at_MU-new.pdf Minsk N/A xxxx://xxx.xxx.xx/en/main.aspx?guid=131301
Grading systems of the institutions. Each institution shall award grades and academic credit based on the academic performance of each individual student, according to the host institutions own established procedures and grading scales. Information about grading system and credits at University of Gothenburg: xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx/english/graduation-and-degrees/degrees/grading-system/ Information about grading system and credits at University of XXX
Grading systems of the institutions. [It is recommended that receiving institutions provide the statistical distribution of grades according to the descriptions in the ECTS users’ guide7. A link to a webpage can be enough. The table will facilitate the interpretation of each grade awarded to students and will facilitate the credit transfer by the sending institution.] AA 4.00 Outstanding AB 3.70 Excellent BA 3.30 Good BB 3.00 Above Average BC 2.70 Center CB 2.30 Below Average
Grading systems of the institutions. SK BRATISL 01 (STU): The grading scheme in Slovakia usually comprises six levels: A - Distinguished (outstanding results) = 1 B - Excellent (above average results) = 1.5 C - Good (average results) = 2 D - Satisfactory (acceptable results) = 2.5 E - Passing (results meet only min. criteria) = 3 FX - Fail (results do not meet min. criteria) = 4 Percentage expression of grading scale: A: 100 - 92%; B: 91 - 83%; C: 82 - 74%; D: 73 - 65%; E: 64 - 56%, FX: 55 - 0%
Grading systems of the institutions. The ECTS users’ guide of University of Maribor is published at the following web page: xxxx://xxx.xx.xx/en/international/erasmus/Pages/ECTS-users-guide.aspx NUPS Faculty of Law Enforcement grading system: In accordance with the Act on Higher Education that can be found in the Study and Examination Code of the University. The student's performance may have assessment: Five scale: illustrious(5), good(4), medium(3), sufficient(2), insufficient(1) classification.
Grading systems of the institutions. The grading system used by Spanish universities is based on specific attainment levels, rather than on a numerical scale or statistical basis. It should be noted that the mark, ‘Matrícula de Honor’, which is the highest grade, is rarely given. Spanish denomination English denomination Local Scale (0-10) ECTS Grade Matrícula de Honor First Class with Distinction 10 Matrícula de Honor A Sobresaliente First Class 9-10 A Notable Second Class 7-8’9 B, C Aprobado Pass Mark 5-6’9 D, E Suspenso Fail 0-4’9 FX, F No presentado Fail 0 F Description of the Institution’s grading system The result achieved in a course unit whether through continuous assessment or in an examination, is generally expressed in a 0 to 20 grading scale. The lowest passing grade is 10. ECTS credits: 1 full academic year = 60 credits 1 semester = 30 credits 1 trimester = 20 credits ECTS grading scale: ECTS scale % of the successful students normally achieving the grade Definition A 10 EXCELLENT - outstanding performance with only minor errors B 25 VERY GOOD - above the average standard but with some errors C 30 GOOD - generally sound work with a number of errors D 25 SATISFACTORY - fair but with significant shortcomings E 10 SUFFICIENT - performance meets the minimum criteria FX - FAIL - some work required before the criteria can be awarded F - FAIL - considerable further work is required
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Grading systems of the institutions. Institution: NL DELFT01
Grading systems of the institutions. EGE UNIVERSITY
Grading systems of the institutions. TR KIRKLAR01; the following scale is used for all types of evaluations/examinations: Official website for the scale is:
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!