Good Scientific Practice. The parties to this agreement undertake to comply with the Rules of Good Scientific Practice as defined in the TUM Code of Conduct / Ehrenkodex (see xxx.xxx.xx). The doctoral candidate is aware that according to § 6 (7) of the TUM Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees scholarly work already submitted for examination purposes may not be re- submitted as part of the doctoral project.
Good Scientific Practice. The parties involved are committed to observing the guidelines that secure good scientific practice and deal with academic misconduct at the TUM (see xxx.xxx.xx). The doctoral candidate is aware that, according to § 6 section 7 of the TUM Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees, his/her own work, having already been used for examination purposes, must not be submitted as a doctoral thesis. Attending a seminar on good scientific practice is recommended.
Good Scientific Practice. Scientific Writing ‣ Presentation Skills ‣ Data visualization 0.2 per day 1 Outreach activities Presentations at international conferences 1 CP/ talk; ½ CP/ poster 1 first author publications in international peer-reviewed journal 1 CP/ submitted 2 CP/ accepted 1 Non-first-author publication in international peer-reviewed journal 1 CP/ publication 0
Good Scientific Practice. The parties hereto undertake to comply with the Code of Conduct for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice and Procedures in Cases of Academic Misconduct (see xxx.xxx.xx). The notice of this code and procedures is confirmed with the signature below. The doctoral candidate is aware that according to § 6 (7) of the Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees of TUM her/his scholarly work already submitted for examination purposes elsewhere must not be re-submitted as doctoral thesis or part of it.
Good Scientific Practice. The parties to this agreement undertake to adhere to the rules concerning good scientific practice and the handling of scientific misconduct (Code of Conduct for Safeguarding Good Academic Practice and Procedures in Cases of Academic Misconduct at Technische Universität München, available at xxx.xxx.xx). The doctoral candidates are aware that according to § 6 (7) of the Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees any scholarly work that has already been submitted for examination purposes may not be resubmitted as part of the doctoral project.
Good Scientific Practice. All parties involved undertake to comply with the principles and guidelines laid down in the statutes of TU Munich for safeguarding good scientific practice and for dealing with scientific misconduct (see xxx.xxx.xx). The acknowledgement of these statutes is confirmed with the signature below. The doctoral candidate is aware that, in accordance with § 7 para. 7 of the TUM Regulations for the Award of Doctoral Degrees, his/her own work that has already served examination purposes may not be submitted as a doctoral thesis/dissertation or as part of a doctoral thesis/dissertation.
Good Scientific Practice. Both IBA and Boehringer Turkey undertake with regard to publications of the Results of the Project to adhere to the rules of Good Scientific Practice and the guidelines for publications of Project data as outlined e.g. by editors of the major medical journals as well as all ethical standards concerning publications and authorship.
Good Scientific Practice. The doctoral candidate and the doctoral committee agree to observe the code `Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice` issued by the German Research Foundation (DFG). In case of LIfBi employees, all parties agree to additionally observe the rules for good scientific practice issued by LIfBi and members of the University of Bamberg additionally observe the respective rules of the university. In alleged cases of scientific misconduct, the parties concerned shall turn to the respective ombudsperson or his/her deputy.
Good Scientific Practice. The PhD candidate agrees to comply with the regulations concerning good scientific practice, in particular the Integrity Ordinance (Ordinance on Dealing with Scientific Misconduct at the University of Zurich, LS 415.27). The PhD candidate must follow the recommendations of the University of Zurich’s Open Science Policy in their work. The use of artificial intelligence is to be indicated in a transparent manner in the source citations. The following information is mandatory: “[Name of generative AI]. (DD/MM/YYYY of the prompt). “Text of prompt”. Created by using [Name of generative AI.] website of generative AI.”
Good Scientific Practice. The doctoral researcher and supervisor agree to com- ply with the principles of good scientific practice at their university/institution and the iDiv code of conduct (xxx.xxxx.xx/xxxxx-xxxx/xxxxxxxx#x00000).
