Group Cooperation. Group shall cooperate and comply with the protocols of Plan which include, but are not limited to: (a) All protocols referenced in this Agreement; (b) Any provider manual and credentialing plan, as modified from time to time by Plan; and (c) Group agrees to arrange for the provision of assistance or advice to Plan's Members, in emergency situations, and arrange for on-call coverage, 24 hours per day, 7 days a week, 365 days per year. Group agrees to post the Consumer Assistance Notice prominently in the reception area, clearly noticeable by all patients pursuant to Florida Statute 641.511 (11). So long as such protocols, policies or procedures have been delivered and agreed to 30 days prior to implementation. Such agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld.
Group Cooperation. Group shall cooperate with the following: (1) all credentialing and recredentialing processes and all medical management, quality assessment and performance improvement, medical policy, peer review, on site review, advance directives, or other similar CMS, AHCA nr Plan poliries and programs; (2) Pian's Member grievance and appeaVexpedited appeal processes, including gathering and forwarding information to Plan on a timely basis, as required in Plan's policies and procedures, that will permit Plan to meet CMS and AHCA required timeframes for disposition of grievances and appeals; (3) the activities of any independent quality review and improvement organization approved by CMS or AHCA that is under contract with Plan; (4) as applicable, Plan's processes for identifying Plan Members with complex or serious medical conditions, assessment of those conditions, and establishment and implementation of a treatment plan appropriate to those conditions; and (5) Plan's processes for conducting an initial assessment of each Plan Member's health care needs within ninety (90) days of the effective date of their enrollment. From time to time, Plan shall consult with Group and its Physicians/Providers, as appropriate, regarding Plan's medical policy, quality assurance program and medical management procedures.
Group Cooperation. Group shall cooperate with the following: (1) all credentialing and recredentialing processes and all medical management, quality assessment and performance improvement, medical policy, peer review, on site review, advance directives, or other similar CMS, AHCA or Plan policies and programs; (2) Plan's Member grievance and appeal/expedited appeal processes, including gathering and forwarding information to Plan on a timely basis, as required in Plan's policies and procedures, that will permit Plan to meet CMS and AHCA required timeframes for disposition of grievances and appeals; (3) the activities of any independent quality review and improvement organization approved by CMS or AHCA that is under contract with Plan; (4) as applicable, Plan's processes for identifying Plan Members with complex or serious medical conditions, assessment of those conditions, and establishment and implementation of a treatment plan appropriate to those conditions; and (5) Plan's processes for conducting an initial assessment of each Plan Member's health care needs within ninety (90) days of the effective date of their enrollment. From time to time, Plan shall consult with Group and its Physicians/Providers, as appropriate, regarding Plan's medical policy, quality assurance program and medical management procedures. Plan may share non-confidential credentialing information with Group as it pertains to Group Physicians/Providers.
Group Cooperation. Group cooperation is quantified as the ratio of actual to maximum potential contri- butions to the public account.17 In PGGs, both surplus and profit are maximized when players put all tokens into the group ac- count. With an MCR of 0.5, a group of four and endowments of 50 tokens each, each player receives 0.5(4 ∗ 50) = 100 tokens, i.e., when others give more are classified as “no type” and ignored in further analysis. See Figure 5.2 for examples of subjects classified as cooperators and free-riders and Figure 5.3 for examples of reciprocators. Each panel shows all data for one player in one session; the fitted line matches regres- sion output, i.e., xˆi = αˆi + βˆixi. Note that each dot is a (x¯igt, xigt) pair that records the average contributions of others to the pub- lic account (independent variable on x-axis) and how much a subject put in the public account (dependent variable on y-axis). The OLS estimates and linear results from this classification scheme are easy double his endowment.18 Efficiency is 100 percent in this case and 0 percent if no play- ers contribute to the public account. Because sessions had between 13 and 20 players, and groups had four or five players, session efficiency is not a simple average of player or group efficiency but the efficiency of the average player in the average group.19 Note the connection between types and efficiency: If cooperators dominate, group contributions and efficiency are higher; if free-riders dominate, they are lower. (Re- ciprocators react to others.) The order of play by types (e.g., cooperator in round one, free-rider in round two, etc.) will not af- fect efficiency if there are enough rounds reject—leaving both with nothing—or accept the split), the modal offer is fifty/fifty. For a discussion of this result and the possible reasons behind it, see Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxx (1995). 17See Footnote 6 for a comparison of this efficiency to the more common definition of efficiency as the ratio of actual to maximum attainable surplus (Xxxxx, 1982). 18Players in group of five had the same MCR, which meant their maximum possible payoff was 125 tokens, and the calculation of efficiency takes that effect into account. 19For example, player 12 is in group three (five players) for run one, group two (four players) for run two, etc. and experiences an individual efficiency that averages efficiency across his five groups. Session efficiency is the average of players’ individual efficiencies. 20Say we have three reci...
Group Cooperation. Subject always to the provisions of Clause 5.2, any Shareholder (a “Proposed Transferor”) wishing to transfer its Securities directly or indirectly to a potential purchaser(s) (each a “Potential Bidder”) to the extent permitted by this Article V (a “Third Party Sale”) shall be entitled to reasonable assistance from each member of the Group and the other Shareholders in the provision of information to each Potential Bidder as part of the Third Party Sale process, whether to form part of a data room or otherwise and, in particular the other Shareholders shall use their reasonable endeavours to facilitate a Third Party Sale by the Proposed Transferor and (without prejudice to the foregoing) shall devote their best efforts to ensure that the relevant member of the Group provide:
(a) reasonable access to and copies of any relevant information on the Group which it has received from the Group and which may be in its possession or under its control;
(b) reasonable assistance in the preparation of an information memorandum, vendor due diligence report(s) and a data room (whether physical or electronic) containing all relevant information relating to the Group necessary to enable a Potential Bidder to make an informed assessment as to whether or not to invest and at what price; provided that access to the data room shall only be granted to Potential Bidders on a short-list compiled after receipt and consideration of indicative bids and compliance with Clause 11.1(a);
(c) all reasonable assistance from Management in the giving of due diligence presentations to and responding to queries from potential purchasers, investors, financiers and their advisers;
(d) all reasonable assistance, subject to appropriate confidentiality undertakings (including the use of ‘clean teams’ or ‘counsel only’ procedures) in making all mandatory and suspensory filings with any Governmental Authority; and
(e) all reasonable assistance by the Group in obtaining third party consents to any change of control restrictions that may be triggered.
