Issue Identification. Work collaboratively to identify issues and barriers to the achievement of the goals identified above and determine how to address aforementioned issues (i.e., at which internal/external forums or tables). Continue to provide reports to the Toronto HSJCC meetings Ensure Co-chair(s) participate at the T- HSJCC meetings To collaborate with the Toronto Service Resolution Project (TSRP) in addressing system barriers for people involved with the justice sector who face significant systemic barriers to service access due to systemic barriers. To provide feedback to the Video Adult Fitness Assessment Project. Strengthen coordination and collaboration between human services and justice sectors Strengthen the awareness of the Toronto Service Resolution Project Committee at the S-HSJCC meetings by providing regular reports. ☐ Pillar 1✓ ☐ Pillar 2✓ ☐ Pillar 3✓ ☐ Pillar 4✓ ☐ Pillar 5 April 2017- March 2018 Members are active participants identifying issues to determine meeting presentations and Lunch and Learn topics and committee’s goals and projects. Initiated discussion about complex clients service gaps in Scarborough Increase membership from the justice sector. Increased awareness of
Issue Identification. If Gogo identifies any issues, it may report them to ThinKom. Gogo shall assign a severity level to any such issue. ThinKom shall respond to Gogo’s reporting of any issue as promptly as possible, and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to diagnose and resolve all issues. Confidential and Proprietary 2 Gogo LLC
Issue Identification. The goal of this task is to work with County decision makers to identify and resolve key issues during the conduct of the business planning process. • Provide information and policy recommendations on issues and choices as they arise during the Work to County representatives and policy committee convened by the County. • Participate in working sessions with the County, committee and its agents to review financial models used in the development of the Business Plan and details of the model’s assumptions, provided that NCI shall not be obligated to consult with or provide draft deliverables, assumptions and/or methodological approaches to agents of the County that are direct competitors of the Contractor. • Identify issues that would impact the feasibility and effectiveness of CCA • Identification of issues and recommendations • Participation in four half-day working sessions with County decision makers to discuss policy issues and recommendations, located at the offices of one of the participating cities, selected by the cities. • Participation in a total of four half-day working sessions with an Advisory Group or a Stakeholders Group, organized by County staff, to discuss policy and/or technical issues and recommendations, located at the offices of one of the participating cities, selected by the County and participating cities. • One half-day meeting to review financial models individually with County Staff and Agents, or a full day meeting jointly with several cities, located at the NCI offices. NCI recognizes that this project is part of the decisional process that will inform a larger energy resource policy being developed by the County. NCI will provide information and otherwise cooperate with other contractors and staff working for the County as requested by the County Project Manager, subject to reasonable confidentiality provisions and protection of NCI’s proprietary information. Additional meetings or workshops requested by the County beyond those specified above will be provided on a time and materials basis at the rates contained in Exhibit B.
Issue Identification. When a designed feature or procedure is not generating the anticipated results in accordance with the Documentation; or - When error logs are present or the Mentis software window errors occur.
